Dual criteria decisions

Journal of Economic Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue , 2014, Pages 101-113

  Andersen, Steffen ^a   Harrison, Glenn W ^b   Lau, Morten Igel ^a,c   Rutström, Elisabet E ^b  

^a Department of Economics Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Individual decision making; Multiple criteria; Natural experiment; Risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897963697     PISSN: 01674870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2013.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allais M. The foundations of positive theory of choice involving risk and a criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American school. Expected utility hypotheses and the Allais paradox 1979, Reidel, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. M. Allais, O. Hagen (Eds.).
2. Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., Rutström, E. E. (2011). Multiattribute utility, intertemporal utility and correlation aversion, working paper 2011-04. Center for the Economic Analysis of Risk, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, January 2011.
3. Andersen S., Harrison G.W., Lau M.I., Rutström E.E. Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences. Econometrica 2008, 76(3):583-619.
4. Andersen S., Harrison G.W., Lau M.I., Rutström E.E. Risk aversion in game shows. Risk aversion in experiments. Research in experimental economics 2008, Vol. 12. Emerald, Bingley, UK.
5. Baumol W.J. An expected gain-confidence limit criterion for portfolio selection. Management Science 1963, 10:174-182.
6. Bell D.E. Risk, return, and utility. Management Science 1995, 41(1):23-30.
7. Benhabib J., Bisin A. Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption-saving decisions. Games and Economic Behavior 2005, 52:460-492.
8. Bombardini M., Trebbi F. Risk aversion and expected utility theory: A field experiment with large and small stakes. Journal of the European Economic Association 2012, 10(6):1348-1399.
9. Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G., Hertwig R. The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review 2006, 113(2):409-432.
10. Byrne R., Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Kotakek K. A chance-constrained approach to capital budgeting with Portfolio type payback and liquidity constraints and horizon posture controls. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1967, 2(4):339-364.
11. Byrne R., Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Kotakek K. Some new approaches to risk. The Accounting Review 1968, 43(1):18-37.
12. Camerer C., Babcock L., Loewenstein G., Thaler R. Labor supply of New York city cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1997, 112(May):407-441.
13. Campbell J.Y., Lo A.W., MacKinlay A.C. The econometrics of financial markets 1997, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
14. Dual process theories in social psychology 1999, Guilford Press, New York, NY. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
15. Cubitt R.P., Sugden R. Dynamic decision-making under uncertainty: An experimental investigation of choices between accumulator gambles. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 2001, 22(2):103-128.
16. El-Gamal M.A., Grether D.M. Are people Bayesian? Uncovering behavioral strategies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995, 90:1137-1145.
17. Farber H.S. Is tomorrow another day? The labor supply of New York City cabdrivers. Journal of Political Economy 2005, 113(1):46-82.
18. Farber H.S. Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The case of New York City taxi drivers. American Economic Review 2008, 98(3):1069-1082.
19. Fishburn P.C. Additive utilities with incomplete product sets: Application to priorities and assignments. Operations Research 1967, 15(3):537-542.
20. Fudenberg D., Levine D.K. A dual-self model of impulse control. American Economic Review 2006, 96(5):1449-1476.
21. Gonzalez R., Wu G. On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology 1999, 38:129-166.
22. Harrison G.W. Neuroeconomics: A critical reconsideration. Economics & Philosophy 2008, 24(3):303-344.
23. Harrison G.W. Neuroeconomics: Rejoinder. Economics & Philosophy 2008, 24(3):433-444.
24. Harrison G.W., Lau M.I., Rutström E.E. Estimating risk attitudes in denmark: A field experiment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2007, 109(2):341-368.
25. Harrison G.W., Lau M.I., Rutström E.E. Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2009, 70:498-507.
26. Harrison G.W., Rutström E.E. Representative agents in lottery choice experiments: One wedding and a decent funeral. Experimental Economics 2009, 12:133-158.
27. Hogarth R.M. Educating intuition 2001, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
28. Holt C.A., Laury S.K. Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 2002, 92(5):1644-1655.
29. Hsee C.K., Rottenstreich Y. Music, pandas, and muggers: On the affective psychology of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:23-30.
30. Johnson N.L., Kotz S., Balakrishnan N. Continuous univariate distributions 1995, Vol. 2. Wiley, New York. 2nd ed.
31. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291.
32. Keeney R.L., Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs 1976, Wiley, New York.
33. Kirkwood C.W. Strategic decision making: Multiobjective decision analysis with spreadsheets 1997, Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
34. Kleinmutz B. Why we still use our heads instead of formulas: Toward an integrative approach. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 107:296-310. [reprinted In T. Connolly, H.R. Arkes, & K.R. Hammond (Eds.) (2000). Judgement and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader. New York: Cambridge University Press].
35. Leland W.J. Generalized similarity judgements: An alternative explanation for choice anomalies. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 1994, 9:151-172.
36. Liberatore M., Nydick R. Decision technology: Modeling, software, and applications 2002, Wiley, New York.
37. Lopes L.L. Risk and distributional inequality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10(4):465-484.
38. Lopes L.L. Algebra and process in the modeling of risky choice. Decision making from a cognitive perspective 1995, Academic Press, San Diego. J.R. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, D.L. Medin (Eds.).
39. Lopes L.L., Oden G.C. The role of aspiration level in risky choice: A comparison of cumulative prospect theory and SP/A theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1999, 43:286-313.
40. Luce R.D. Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica 1956, 24:178-191.
41. Luce R.D., Fishburn P.C. Rank and sign-dependent linear utility Models for finite first-order gambles. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 1991, 4:29-59.
42. Mukherjee K. A dual system model of preferences under risk. Psychological Review 2010, 177(1):243-255.
43. Oden G.C., Lopes L.L. Risky choice with fuzzy criteria. Psychologische Beiträge 1997, 39:56-82.
44. Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1982, 3(4):323-343.
45. Roy A.D. Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica 1952, 20(3):431-449.
46. Roy A.D. Risk and rank or safety first generalised. Economica 1995, 23(August):214-228.
47. Rubinstein A. Similarity and decision-making under risk (Is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox?). Journal of Economic Theory 1988, 46:145-153.
48. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process 1980, McGraw Hill, New York.
49. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:645-726.
50. Starmer C. Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature 2000, 38(June):332-382.
51. Starmer C., Sugden R. Violations of the independence axiom in common ratio problems: An experimental test of some competing hypotheses. Annals of Operational Research 1989, 19:79-102.
52. Thaler R.H., Johnson E.J. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science 1990, 36(6):643-660.
53. Tversky A. Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review 1969, 76:31-48.
54. Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychological Review 1977, 84:327-352.
55. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representations of uncertainty. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty 1992, 5:297-323. [references to reprint In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.) (2000). Choices, values, and frames. New York: Cambridge University Press].
56. von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W. Decision analysis and behavioral research 1986, Cambridge University Press, New York.
57. Yaari M.E. The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 1987, 55(1):95-115.