Erratum: Editorial. Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature (Journal of Neurosurgery (2014) DOI: 10.3171/2013.10.JNS13724);Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature

Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 120, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 791-794

  Sampson, John H ^a   Barker II, Fred G ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHECKLIST; CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA; CRANIOTOMY; EDITORIAL; FUNDING; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; NEUROSURGEON; NEUROSURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; NEUROSURGERY; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84897951831     PISSN: 00223085     EISSN: 19330693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.JNS13724a     Document Type: Erratum

References (23)

1. Anyanwu AC, Treasure T: Unrealistic expectations arising from mortality data reported in the cardiothoracic journals. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:16-20, 2002
2. Bader J, Ismail A: Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 135:464-473, 2004 (Pubitemid 38591865)
3. Barker FG II, Carter BS: Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Neurosurg Focus 19(4): E5, 2005
4. Bhandari M, Morrow F, Kulkarni AV, Tornetta P III: Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. A systematic review of their methodologies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:15-24, 2001 (Pubitemid 32116103)
5. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR: Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2009
6. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI: Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 342:1887-1892, 2000 (Pubitemid 30419054)
7. Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (eds): The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, ed 2. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2009
8. Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, et al (eds): A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, ed 3. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1999
9. Findlen P (ed): Athanasius Kircher: The Last Man Who Knew Everything. New York: Routledge, 2004
10. Fleming PS, Seehra J, Polychronopoulou A, Fedorowicz Z, Pandis N: A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics. Angle Orthodont 83: 158-163, 2013
11. Gagnier JJ, Kellam PJ: Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e771-e777, 2013
12. Gnanalingham KK, Tysome J, Martinez-Canca J, Barazi SA: Quality of clinical studies in neurosurgical journals: signs of improvement over three decades. J Neurosurg 103:439-443, 2005 (Pubitemid 43186634)
13. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds): Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2008
14. Killeen S, Sourallous P, Hunter IA, Hartley JE, Grady HL: Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals. Ann Surg [epub ahead of print], 2013
15. Klimo P, Thompson CJ, Ragel BT, Boop FA: Methodology and reporting of meta-analysis in the neurosurgical literature. A review. J Neurosurg [epub ahead of print January 24, 2014. DOI: 10.3171/2013.11.JNS13195]
16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535, 2009
17. Momeni A, Lee GK, Talley JR: The quality of systematic reviews in hand surgery: an analysis using AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:831-837, 2013
18. Mrkobrada M, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Haynes RB, Iansavichus AV, Rehman F, Garg AX: Need for quality improvement in renal systematic reviews. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3: 1102-1114, 2008
19. Schmidt LM, Gotzsche PC: Of mites and men: reference bias in narrative review articles: a systematic review. J Fam Pract 54:334-338, 2005 (Pubitemid 40489426)
20. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al: Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:10, 2007
21. Strauss SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB (eds): Evidence Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, ed 3. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2005
22. United States Senate Finance Committee: Staff report on Medtronic's influence on INFUSE clinical studies. Int J Occup Environ Health 19:67-76, 2013
23. Wang AT, McCoy CP, Murad MH, Montori VM: Association between industry affiliation and position on cardiovascular risk with rosiglitazone: cross sectional systematic review. BMJ 340:c1344, 2010