Effect of 2H and 18O water isotopes in kinesin-1 gliding assay

PeerJ

Volumn 2014, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Maloney, Andy ^a   Herskowitz, Lawrence J ^b   Koch, Steven J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Fann Instrument Company   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Gliding motility assay; Heavy water; Kinesin 1; Microtubules

Indexed keywords

BUFFER; DEUTERIUM; KINESIN 1; OXYGEN 18; WATER;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GLIDING MOTILITY ASSAY; KINETICS; MICROSCOPY; MICROTUBULE; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY;

EID: 84897932314     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21678359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.284     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Asbury CL, Fehr AN, Block SM. 2003. Kinesin moves by an asymmetric hand-over-hand mechanism. Science 302:2130-2134 DOI 10.1126/science.1092985.
2. Bachand GD, Rivera SB, Boal AK, Gaudioso J, Liu J, Bunker BC. 2004. Assembly and transport of nanocrystal CdSe quantum dot nanocomposites using microtubules and kinesin motor proteins. Nano Letters 4:817-821 DOI 10.1021/nl049811h.
3. Benner SA. 1989. Enzyme kinetics and molecular evolution. Chemical Reviews 89:789-806 DOI 10.1021/cr00094a004.
4. Berliner E, Young EC, Anderson K,Mahtani HK, Gelles J. 1995. Failure of a single-headed kinesin to track parallel to microtubule protofilaments. Nature 373:718-721 DOI 10.1038/373718a0.
5. Blacklow SC, Raines RT, LimWA, Zamore PD, Knowles JR. 1988. Triosephosphate isomerase catalysis is diffusion controlled. Biochemistry 27:1158-1165 DOI 10.1021/bi00404a013.
6. Böohm KJ, Stracke R, Baum M, Zieren M, Unger E. 2000. Effect of temperature on kinesin-driven microtubule gliding and kinesin ATPase activity. FEBS Letters 466:59-62 DOI 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01757-3.
7. Böohm KJ, Stracke R, Unger E. 2000. Speeding up kinesin-driven microtubule gliding in vitro by variation of cofactor composition and physicochemical parameters. Cell Biology International 24:335-341 DOI 10.1006/cbir.1999.0515.
8. Böohm KJ, Stracke R, Vater W, Unger E. 2004. Inhibition of Kinesin-driven microtubule motility by polyhydroxy compounds. In: Hein H-J, Bischoff G, eds. Micro- and nanostructures of biological systems. Aachen: Shaker Verlag GmbH, Germany, 153-165. Available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2007440241.
9. Castro JS, Deymier PA, Trzaskowski B, Bucay J. 2010. Heterogeneous and homogeneous nucleation of Taxol crystals in aqueous solutions and gels: effect of tubulin proteins. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 76:199-206 DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.10.033.
10. Castro JS, Trzaskowski B, Deymier PA, Bucay J, Adamowicz L, Hoying JB. 2009. Binding affinity of fluorochromes and fluorescent proteins to Taxol crystals. Materials Science and Engineering: C 29:1609-1615 DOI 10.1016/j.msec.2008.12.026.
11. Chaen S, Yamamoto N, Shirakawa I, Sugi H. 2001. Effect of deuterium oxide on actomyosin motility in vitro. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1506:218-223 DOI 10.1016/S0005-2728(01)00216-X.
12. Chaen S, Yamamoto N, Shirakawa I, Sugi H. 2003. In vitro actomyosin motility in deuterium oxide. Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Muscle Contraction 538:183-192 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9029-7 17.
13. Chakrabarti G, Kim S, Gupta ML, Barton JS, Himes RH. 1999. Stabilization of tubulin by deuterium oxide. Biochemistry 38:3067-3072 DOI 10.1021/bi982461r.
14. Cho C, Singh S, Robinson GW. 1996. Liquid water and biological systems: the most important problem in science that hardly anyone wants to see solved. Faraday Discussions 103:19-27 DOI 10.1039/fd9960300019.
15. Covington AK, Paabo M, Robinson RA, Bates RG. 1968. Use of the glass electrode in deuterium oxide and the relation between the standardized pD (paD) scale and the operational pH in heavy water. Analytical Chemistry 40:700-706 DOI 10.1021/ac60260a013.
16. Desai A,Mitchison TJ. 1997. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 13:83-117 DOI 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.83.
17. Foss M,Wilcox BWL, Alsop GB, Zhang D. 2008. Taxol crystals can masquerade as stabilized microtubules. PLoS ONE 3:e1476 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001476.
18. Gagliano J,Walb M, Blaker B,Macosko JC, Holzwarth G. 2010. Kinesin velocity increases with the number of motors pulling against viscoelastic drag. European Biophysics Journal 39:801-813 DOI 10.1007/s00249-009-0560-8.
19. Guydosh NR, Block SM. 2009. Direct observation of the binding state of the kinesin head to the microtubule. Nature 461:125-128 DOI 10.1038/nature08259.
20. Hackney DD, Stempel KE, Boyer PD. 1980. Oxygen-18 probes of enzymic reactions of phosphate compounds. Methods in Enzymology 64:60-83 DOI 10.1016/S0076.-68798064005-1.
21. Hardy RC, Cottington RL. 1949. Viscosity of deuterium oxide and water from 5{ring operator}to 125 {ring operator}C. The Journal of Chemical Physics 17:509-510 DOI 10.1063/1.1747310.
22. Hess H, Clemmens J, Brunner C, Doot R, Luna S, Ernst K-H, Vogel V. 2005. Molecular self-assembly of nanowires and "nanospools" using active transport. Nano Letters 5:629-633 DOI 10.1021/nl0478427.
23. Highsmith S. 1977. The effects of temperature and salts on myosin subfragment-1 and F-actin association. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 180:404-408 DOI 10.1016/0003-9861(77)90054-6.
24. Highsmith S, Duignan K, Cooke R, Cohen J. 1996. Osmotic pressure probe of actin-myosin hydration changes during ATP hydrolysis. Biophysical Journal 70:2830-2837 DOI 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79852-1.
25. Hotta K,Morales MF. 1960. Myosin B nucleoside triphosphatase in deuterium oxide. Journal of Biological Chemistry 235:PC61-PC63.
26. Houston LL, Odell J, Lee YC, Himes RH. 1974. Solvent isotope effects on microtubule and depolymerization polymerization. Journal of Molecular Biology 87:141-146 DOI 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90566-X.
27. Inoue A, Fukushima Y, Tonomura Y. 1975. Effects of deuterium oxide on elementary steps in the ATPase reactions evidence for the similarity of key intermediates in contractile and transport ATPase. The Journal of Biochemistry 78:1113-1121.
28. Israelachvili J,Wennerström H. 1996. Role of hydration and water structure in biological and colloidal interactions. Nature 379:219-225 DOI 10.1038/379219a0.
29. Kim E, Byun K-E, Choi DS, Lee DJ, Cho DH, Lee BY, Yang H, Heo J, Chung H-J, Seo S, Hong S. 2013. Electrical control of kinesin-microtubule motility using a transparent functionalizedgraphene substrate. Nanotechnology 24:195102 DOI 10.1088/0957-4484/24/19/195102.
30. Kudish AI,Wolf D, Steckel F. 1972. Physical properties of heavy-oxygen water. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1 68:2041-2046 DOI 10.1039/f19726802041.
31. Kushner DJ, Baker A, Dunstall TG. 1999. Pharmacological uses and perspectives of heavy water and deuterated compounds. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 77:79-88 DOI 10.1139/y99-005.
32. Lewis GN. 1933. The biochemistry of water containing hydrogen isotope. Journal of the American Chemical Society 55:3503-3504 DOI 10.1021/ja01335a509.
33. Lewis GN. 1934. The biology of heavy water. Science 79:151-153 DOI 10.1126/science.79.2042.151.
34. Maloney A, Herskowitz LJ, Koch SJ. 2011. Effects of surface passivation on gliding motility assays. PLoS ONE 6:e19522 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019522.
35. Ma Y-Z, Taylor EW. 1997. Interacting head mechanism of microtubule-kinesin ATPase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 272:724-730 DOI 10.1074/jbc.272.2.724.
36. Miller-Jaster KN, Petrie Aronin CE, Guilford WH. 2012. A quantitative comparison of blocking agents in the in vitro motility assay. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering 5:44-51 DOI 10.1007/s12195-011-0202-y.
37. Moyer ML, Gilbert SP, Johnson KA. 1998. Pathway of ATP hydrolysis by monomeric and dimeric kinesin. Biochemistry 37:800-813 DOI 10.1021/bi9711184.
38. Muthukrishnan G, Zhang Y, Shastry S, HancockWO. 2009. The processivity of kinesin-2 motors suggests diminished front-head gating. Current Biology 19:442-447 DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.058.
39. Nemet BA, Shabtai Y, Cronin-Golomb M. 2002. Imaging microscopic viscosity with confocal scanning optical tweezers. Optics Letters 27:264-266 DOI 10.1364/OL.27.000264.
40. Olmstedt JB, Borisy GG. 1975. Ionic and nucleotide requirements for microtubule polymerization in vitro? Biochemistry 14:2996-3005 DOI 10.1021/bi00684a032.
41. Panda D, Chakrabarti G, Hudson J, Pigg K,Miller HP,Wilson L, Himes RH. 2000. Suppression of microtubule dynamic instability and treadmilling by deuterium oxide. Biochemistry 39:5075-5081 DOI 10.1021/bi992217f.
42. Parsegian VA, Rand RP, Rau DC. 2000. Osmotic stress, crowding, preferential hydration, and binding: a comparison of perspectives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97:3987-3992 DOI 10.1073/pnas.97.8.3987.
43. Parsegian VA, Rand RP, Rau DC. 1995. Macromolecules and water: probing with osmotic stress. Methods in Enzymology 259:43-94 DOI 10.1016/0076.-68799559039-0.
44. Pittendrigh CS, Cosbey ES. 1974. On the very rapid enhancement by D2O of the temperature-tolerance of adult Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 71:540-543 DOI 10.1073/pnas.71.2.540.
45. Sen A, Balamurugan V, Rajak KK, Chakravarti S, Bhanuprakash V, Singh RK. 2009. Role of heavy water in biological sciences with an emphasis on thermostabilization of vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines 8:1587-1602 DOI 10.1586/erv.09.105.
46. Shelanski ML, Gaskint F, Cantort CR. 1973. Microtubule assembly in the absence of added nucleotides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 70:765-768 DOI 10.1073/pnas.70.3.765.
47. Sidorova NY, Rau DC. 2001. Linkage of EcoRI dissociation from its specific DNA recognition site to water activity, salt concentration, and pH: separating their roles in specific and non-specific binding. Journal of Molecular Biology 310:801-816 DOI 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4781.
48. Silverman BW. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, 1st ed. New York: Chapman and Hall.
49. Sinha S, Ray AK, Kundu S, Sasikumar S, Dasgupta K. 2002. Heavy-water-based solutions of rhodamine dyes: photophysical properties and laser operation. Applied Physics B 75:85-90 DOI 10.1007/s00340-002-0932-6.
50. Somlyai G, Jancsó G, Jákli G, Vass K, Barna B, Lakics V, Gaál T. 1993. Naturally occurring deuterium is essential for the normal growth rate of cells. FEBS Letters 317:1-4 DOI 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81479-J.