New laws but few cases: Understanding the challenges to the investigation and prosecution of human trafficking cases

Crime, Law and Social Change

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 139-168

  Farrell, Amy ^a   Owens, Colleen ^b   McDevitt, Jack ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b URBAN INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897849649     PISSN: 09254994     EISSN: 15730751     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10611-013-9442-1     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Albonetti, C. (1986). Criminality, prosecutorial screening and uncertainty: toward a theory of discretionary decision making in felony case processings. Criminology, 24, 623-644.
2. Albonetti, C. (1987). Prosecutorial discretion: the effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21, 291-313.
3. Beichner, D., & Spohn, C. (2005). Prosecutorial charging decisions in sexual assault cases: examining the impact of a specialized prosecution unit. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 461-498.
4. Bittner, E. (1980). Aspects of police work. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
5. Buzawa, E., & Buzawa, C. (2002). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
6. Crank, J., & Langworthy, R. (1992). An institutional perspective on policing. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 338-363.
7. Clawson, H., & Dutch, N. (2008). Addressing the needs of victims of human trafficking challenges, barriers, and promising practices. Washington, DC: ICF International.
8. Clawson, H., Dutch, N., Lopez, S., & Tiapula, S. (2008). Prosecuting human trafficking cases: Lessons learned and promising practices. Washington, DC: ICF International.
9. Edelman, L. (1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: the expansion of due process in the American workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1401-1440.
10. Edelman, L. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1531-1576.
11. Farrell, A., McDevitt, J., & Fahy, S. (2008). Final report: understanding and improving local law enforcement response to human trafficking. NCJ-222752. United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
12. Farrell, A., McDevitt, J., & Fahy, S. (2010). Where are all the victims? Understanding the determinants of official identification of human trafficking incidents. Criminology & Public Policy, 9, 201-233.
13. Farrell, A., McDevitt, J., Pfeffer, R., Fahy, S., Owens, C., Dank, M., et al. (2012). Identifying challenges to improve the investigation and prosecution of state and local human trafficking cases. NCJ 238795. Submitted to National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
14. Ferraro, K. (1989). Policing women battering. Social Problems, 36, 61-74.
15. Frohmann, L. (1991). Discrediting victims' allegations of sexual assault: prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38, 213-226.
16. Frohmann, L. (1997). Convictability and discordant locales: reproducing race, class and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decision-making. Law &Society Review, 31, 531-555.
17. Gerwirtz, A., Weidner, R. R., Miller, H., & Zehm, K. (2006). Domestic violence cases involving children: effects of an evidence-based prosecution approach. Violence and Victims, 21, 213-229.
18. Goodman, J. L., & Leidholt, D. (2011). Lawyers manual on human trafficking: Pursuing justice for victims. New York: Appellate Division, First Department, Supreme Court of the State of New York and the New York State Judicial Committee on Women in the Courts.
19. Goździak, E., & Bump, M. (2008). Data and resources on human trafficking: Bibliography of research based literature. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of International Migration, Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University.
20. Grattet, R., & Jenness, V. (2001). The birth and maturation of hate crime policy in the United States. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 668-696.
21. Grattet, R., & Jenness, V. (2005). The reconstitution of law in local settings: agency discretion, ambiguity, and a surplus of law in the policing of hate crime. Law &Society Review, 39, 893-942.
22. Grona-Robb, B. (2010). Prosecuting human traffickers. The Prosecutor, 40 (September-October). Retrieved from http://www. tdcaa. com/node/7370http://www. tdcaa. com/node/7370. December 2012.
23. Hawkins, D. (1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 1, 207-230.
24. Hossain, M., Zimmerman, C., Abas, M., Light, M., & Watts, C. (2010). The relationship of trauma to mental disorders among trafficked and sexually exploited girls and women. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2442-2449.
25. International Labour Organization. (2012). ILO 2012 Global Estimate of Forced Labour. Geneva: Author.
26. Jacoby, J. (1976). The prosecutor's charging decision: A policy perspective. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
27. Jacoby, J. (1980). The American prosecutor: A search for identity. Toronto: Heath.
28. Jacoby, J., Mellon, L., Ratledge, E., & Turner, S. (1982). Prosecutorial decision-making: A national study. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice.
29. Jenness, V., & Grattet, R. (2005). The law-in-between: the effects of organizational perviousness on the policing of hate crimes. Social Problems, 52, 337-359.
30. Kerstetter, W. (1990). Gateway to justice: police and prosecutorial response to sexual assaults against women. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 267-313.
31. LaFave, W. R. (1965). Arrest: The decision to take a suspect into custody. Boston: Little, Brown.
32. LaFree, G. (1980). Variables affecting guilty pleas and convictions in rape cases: toward a social theory of rape processing. Social Forces, 58: 833-850.
33. LaFree, G. (1981). Official reactions to social problems: police decisions in sexual assault cases. Social Problems, 28, 582-594.
34. LaFree, G. (1989). Rape and criminal justice: The social construction of sexual assault. Belmont: Wadsworth.
35. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage.
36. Manning, P. K. (1997). Police work: The social organization of policing. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
37. McCahil, T., Meyer, L., & Fischman, A. (1979). The aftermath of rape. Lexington: Lexington Books.
38. McDonald, W. (2004). Trafficking counts, symbols and agendas: a critique of the campaign against trafficking in human beings. International Review of Victimology, 11, 143-176.
39. Markon, J. (2007). Human trafficking evokes outrage, little evidence: U. S. estimates thousands of victims but efforts to find them fall short. Washington Post. September 23.
40. McPhail, B., & Jenness, V. (2005). To charge or not to charge?-that is the question: the pursuit of strategic advantage in prosecutorial decision-making surrounding hate crime. Journal of Hate Studies, 4, 89-119.
41. Mellon, L., Jacoby, J., & Brewer, M. (1981). The prosecutor constrained by his environment: a new look at discretionary justice in the United States. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 12, 52-81.
42. Messing, J. T. (2010). Evidence-based prosecution of intimate partner violence in the post-Crawford era: a single-city study of the factors leading to prosecution. Crime & Delinquency, e-pub online before print.
43. Miller, F. (1969). Prosecution: The decision to charge a suspect with a crime. Boston: Little, Brown.
44. Miller, N. (2001). Stalking laws and implementation practices: A national review for policymakers and practitioners. Alexandria: Institute for Law and Justice.
45. National Association of Attorneys Generals (NAAG). (2001). Best practices in human trafficking law. NAA Gazette. Accessed from: http://www. naag. org/best-practices-in-human-trafficking-law. php. December 2012.
46. National Association of Attorneys Generals (NAAG). (2012). A resolution in support of the principles embodied within the NAAG 2012 Presidential Initiative on Human Trafficking. Retrieved August 1, 2012 from http://www. naag. org/assets/files/pdf/resolution. 201203. Human_Trafficking. pdf.
47. National District Attorneys Association (NDAA) (2011). Human Trafficking Statutes. Retrieved December 1, 2012 from http://www. ndaa. org/pdf/Human%20Trafficking%20Chart. pdf.
48. National District Attorneys Association (NDAA). (2012). Civil remedies for human trafficking victims. Retrieved December 1, 2012 from http://www. ndaa. org/pdf/Civil%20Remedies%20for%20Human%20Trafficking%20Victims-jan2012. pdf.
49. Newton, P., Mulcahy, T., & Martin, S. (2008). Finding victims of human trafficking. Bethesda: National Opinion Research Center.
50. Nolan, J., & Akiyama, Y. (1999). An analysis of the factors that affect law enforcement participation in hate crime reporting. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15, 111-127.
51. Polaris Project. (2006). Top 15 problem areas in state bills on trafficking in persons. Washington, DC: Polaris Project. Retrieved from http://www. polarisproject. org/storage/documents/policy_documents/Top%2015%20Problem%20Areas%20in%20State%20Bills%20on%20Trafficking. pdf.
52. Polaris Project. (2012). Majority of states passing laws to actively combat trafficking, press release. Washington, DC: Author.
53. Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1979). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54. Sadruddin, H., Walter, N., & Hidalgo, J. (2005). Human trafficking in the United States: expanding victim protection beyond prosecution witnesses. Stanford Law &Policy Review, 16, 379-416.
55. Schmidt, J., & Steury, E. H. (1989). Prosecutorial discretion in filing charges in domestic violence cases. Criminology, 27, 487-510.
56. Spears, J. W., & Spohn, C. (1997). The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors' charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Quarterly, 14, 501-524.
57. Spohn, C., Gruhl, J., & Welch, S. (1987). The impact of the ethnicity and gender of defendants on the decision to reject or dismiss felony charges. Criminology, 25, 175-191.
58. Stanko, E. (1982). The impact of victim assessment on prosecutor's screening decisions: the case of the New York County District Attorney's Office. Law & Society Review, 16, 225-240.
59. Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interactions of race, gender and age in criminal sentencing: the punishment cost of being young, Black and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.
60. U. S. Department of State. (2012). Trafficking in persons report. Washington, DC: Author.
61. Victims of Trafficking and Violence Prevention Act of 2000. PL 106-386, Statutes at Large 114 (2000 1470.
62. Weitzer, R. (2007). The social construction of sex trafficking: ideology and institutionalization of a moral crusade. Politics & Society, 35, 447-475.
63. Weitzer, R. (2012). Sex trafficking and the sex industry: the need for evidence-based theory and legislation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101, 1337-1370.
64. Zimmerman, C., Hossain, M., Yun, K., Gajadziev, V., Guzun, N., Tchomarova, M., et al. (2008). The health of trafficked women: a survey of women entering post trafficking services in Europe. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 55-59.
65. Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (2004).
66. United States v. Kozminski, 487 U. S. 931 (1988).
67. 18 U. S. Code §1590, Trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor.
68. 18 U. S. Code §1591, Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion.
69. Florida HB 7049, Human trafficking (2012).
70. Mann Act, 18 USC §2421, Transportation generally (1910, amended 1978 and 1986).
71. Texas HB 4009, An Act relating to the establishment of a victim assistance program to provide services to domestic victims of trafficking (2009).
72. Washington SB 5482, 62nd legislative session. Authorizing existing funding to house victims of human trafficking and their families (2011).