Validation of a novel non-biological bench model for the training of percutaneous renal access

International Braz J Urol

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 87-92

  Zhang, Yi ^a   Yu, Cheng Fan ^a   Jin, Shi Hua ^a   Li, Ning Chen ^a   Na, Yan Qun ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Education; Nephrostomy; Percutaneous; Validation studies publication type

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME; VALIDATION STUDY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HUMANS; LEARNING CURVE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84897837573     PISSN: 16775538     EISSN: 16776119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.13     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Tanriverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M, Kadihasanoglu M, Horasanli K, Miroglu C: The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007; 52: 206-11.
2. Acosta E, Temkin B: Dynamic generation of surgery specific simulators -- a feasibility study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005; 111: 1-7.
3. Scott DJ, Cendan JC, Pugh CM, Minter RM, Dunnington GL, Kozar RA: The changing face of surgical education: simulation as the new paradigm. J Surg Res. 2008; 147: 189-93.
4. Wignall GR, Denstedt JD, Preminger GM, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS, Sweet RM, et al.: Surgical simulation: a urological perspective. J Urol. 2008; 179: 1690-9.
5. Scott DJ, Cendan JC, Pugh CM, Minter RM, Dunnington GL, Kozar RA: The changing face of surgical education: simulation as the new paradigm. J Surg Res. 2008; 147: 189-93.
6. Rosen KR: The history of medical simulation. J Crit Care. 2008; 23: 157-66.
7. Mishra S, Jagtap J, Sabnis RB, Desai MR: Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2013; 23: 147-51.
8. Sampaio FJ, Pereira-Sampaio MA, Favorito LA: The pig kidney as an endourologic model: anatomic contribution. J Endourol. 1998; 12: 45-50.
9. Earp PP: Percutaneous renal surgery--new model for learning and training. Int Braz J Urol. 2003;9: 151-4.
10. Strohmaier WL, Giese A: Ex vivo training model for percutaneous renal surgery. Urol Res. 2005; 33: 191-3.
11. Hammond L, Ketchum J, Schwartz BF: A new approach to urology training: a laboratory model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2004; 172: 1950-2.
12. Häcker A, Wendt-Nordahl G, Honeck P, Michel MS, Alken P, Knoll T: A biological model to teach percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique with ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided access. J Endourol. 2007; 21: 545-50.
13. Zhang Y, Ou TW, Jia JG, Gao W, Cui X, Wu JT, et al.: Novel biologic model for percutaneous renal surgery learning and training in the laboratory. Urology. 2008; 72: 513-6.
14. Mishra S, Kurien A, Patel R, Patil P, Ganpule A, Muthu V, et al.: Validation of virtual reality simulation for percutaneous renal access training. J Endourol. 2010; 24: 635-40.
15. Knudsen BE, Matsumoto ED, Chew BH, Johnson B, Margulis V, Cadeddu JA, et al.: A randomized, controlled, prospective study validating the acquisition of percutaneous renal collecting system accessskills using a computer based hybrid virtual reality surgical simulator: phase I. J Urol. 2006; 176: 2173-8.
16. de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, Conort P: Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy--a critical review. Eur Urol. 2008; 54: 994-1001.
17. Mishra S, Kurien A, Ganpule A, Muthu V, Sabnis R, Desai M: Percutaneous renal access training: content validation comparison between a live porcine and a virtual reality (VR) simulation model. BJU Int. 2010; 106: 1753-6.
18. Schoppler G.M., Heinzelbecker J, Krombach P, Alken, P: A training model for the puncture of ultrasound- and fluoroscopy- guilded percutaneous nephrolithotomy (abstract). Eur Urol Suppl. 2011; 10: 134.
19. Aucar JA, Groch NR, Troxel SA, Eubanks SW: A review of surgical simulation with attention to validation methodology. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005; 15: 82-9.
20. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM: Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17: 1525-9.
21. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, et al.: Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002; 236: 458-63; discussion 463-4.