A novel use of Twitter to provide feedback and evaluations

Clinical Teacher

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 141-145

  Desai, Bobby ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EVALUATION STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; MEDICAL STAFF; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL MEDIA;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEEDBACK; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84897783523     PISSN: 17434971     EISSN: 1743498X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tct.12086     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Sostok MA, MD, Coberly L, Rouan G. Feedback Process between Faculty and Students. Acad Med 2002;77:267.
2. Gil DH. Perceptions of medical school faculty members and students on clinical clerkship feedback. J Med Educ 1984;59:856-864.
3. Branch WT, Paranjape A. Feedback and Reflection: Teaching Methods for Clinical Settings. Acad Med 2002;77:1185-1188.
4. Isaacson JH, Post LK, Litaker DG, Halperin AK. Resident Perception of the evaluation process. J Gen Intern Med 1995;10:S89.
5. Croskerry P. The Feedback Sanction. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1232-1238.
6. Stieger S, Burger C. Let's Go Formative: Continuous Student Ratings with Web 2.0 Application Twitter. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2010;13:163-167.
7. Kogan JR, Bellini LM, Shea JA. Have you had your feedback today? Acad Med 2000;75:1041.
8. Steiner DD, Rain JS. Immediate and delayed primacy and recency effects in performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989;74:136-142.
9. O'Reilly T. What Is Web 2.0. Available at http://oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed on 6 August 2011.