Addressing interdependencies of complex technical networks

Understanding Complex Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 279-309

  Kröger, Wolfgang ^a   Nan, Cen ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897707629     PISSN: 18600832     EISSN: 18600840     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03518-5_13     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Newman DE, Carreras BA, Degala NS, Dobson I. Risk Metrics for Dynamic Complex Infrastructure Systems Such as the Power Transmission Grid. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 2082-2090, 2012.
2. Kröger W, Zio E. Vulnerable Systems, Springer, 2011.
3. Habenberger J, Kröger W, Probst P, Raschke M, Schläpfer M, Birchmeier J. Stromversorgungssystem Schweiz. BABS Report: ETH Zurich, 2009.
4. Bilis EI, Kröger W, Nan C. Performance of Electric Power Systems under Physical Malicious Attacks. IEEE Systems Journal. Vol. 7(4), p.854-865, 2013.
5. Eusgeld I, KrögerW, Sansavini G, SchläpferM, Zio E. The role of network theory and objectoriented modeling within a framework for the vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 94, p.954-963, 2009.
6. Igure VM, Laughter SA, Williams RD. Security Issues in SCADA Networks. Journal of, Computers and Security, Vol. 25, p. 498-506, 2006.
7. Boyer SA. SCADA supervisory control and data acquisition. 3rd ed. Research Triangle Park: ISA; 2004.
8. Stouffer K., Falco J., Scarfone K. Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2008.
9. Nan C, Kröger W, Eusgeld I. Focal Report: Study of Common Cause Failures of SCADA System at Substation Level, BABS Report: ETH Zurich, 2011.
10. Balducelli C, Bologna S, Lavalle L, Vicoli G. Safeguarding information intensive critical infrastructures against novel types of emerging failures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 92, p. 1218-1229, 2007.
11. Nai Fovino I, Carcano A, Masera M, Trombetta A. An experimental investigation of malware attacks on SCADA systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection. Vol. 2, p. 139-145, 2009.
12. SWISSGRID: Die Nationale Netzgesellschaft. 2007.
13. Aitel D. Cybersecurity Essentials for Electric Operators. The Electricity Journal. 2013.
14. Slay J, Miller M. Lessons learned from the Maroochy water breach. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. Vol. 253, p. 73-82, 2008.
15. (FPL) FPaLC. FPL announces preliminary findings of outage investigation. 2008.
16. Christansson H, Luiijf E. Creating a European SCADA Security Testbed. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. Boston: Springer; p. 237-247, 2007.
17. Zhou L. Forcal Report: Vulnerability Analysis of Industrial Control Systems - Part B: Statistics and analysis of industrial security incidents, Challenges of ICS security research.BABSReport: ETH Zurich, 2011.
18. Trantopoulos K. Focal Report:Vulnerability ofCritical Infrastructrures-Rail Transport Switzerland. BABS Report: ETH Zurich, 2010.
19. Kröger W, Nan C, Trantopoulos K, Zhou L, Eusgeld I. Report: Interdependencies. BABS Report: ETH Zurich, 2009.
20. Railroad Accident Brief: Accident DCA-01-MR-004. In: Board USNTS, editor.NTSB/RAB- 04/08.
21. Rinaldi SM, Peerenboom JP, Kelly TK. Identifying, Understanding, and Analyzing Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine. 2001; Vol. 21: p. 11-25.
22. Griot C. Modelling and simulation for critical infrastructure interdependency assessment: a meta-review for model characterisation. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure. Vol. 6, p. 363-379, 2010.
23. Pederson P, Dudenhoeffer D, Hartly S, Permann M. Critical Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling: A Survey of U.S and International Research. Idaho National Laboratory; 2006.
24. Zimmerman R. Decision-making and the vulnerability of interdependent critical infrastructure. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. p. 4059-4063, 2004.
25. International Risk Governance Council. Policy Brief: Managing and reducing social vulnerabilities from coupled critical infrastructures. Geneva, Switzerland: IRGC; 2007.
26. KrögerW.Critical infrastructure at risk:ANeed ForANewConceptual Approach andExtended Analytical Tools. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 93, p. 1781-1787, 2008.
27. Eusgeld I, Nan C, Dietz S. "System-of-systems"Approach for Interdependent Critical Infrastructures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 96, p. 679-686, 2011.
28. LeontiefWW. Input-output economics. 2nd Ed ed: Oxford University Press, New York; 1986.
29. Setola R, De Porcellinis S, Sforna M. Critical infrastructure dependency assessment using the input-output inoperability model. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection. Vol. 2, p. 170-178, 2009.
30. Haimes YY, Horowitz BM, Lambert JH, Santos JR, Lian C, Crowther KG. Inoperability Input- Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. I: Theory and Methodology. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. Vol. 11, p. 67-79, 2005.
31. Haimes YY, Horowitz BM, Lambert JH, Santos J, Crowther K, Lian C. Inoperability Input- Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. II: Case Studies. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. Vol. 11, p. 80-92, 2005.
32. Trantopoulos K. Focal Report: Methods for the Vulnerability Assessment of Multi-layer Infrastructure Networks-The Swiss Rail System. BABS Report: ETH Zurich, 2011.
33. Klein R, Rome E, Beyel C, Linnemann R, ReinhardtW. Information Modelling and Simulation in large interdependent Critical Infrastructures in IRRIIS. IRRIS Report 2007.
34. Steen Mv. Graph Theory and Complex Networks: An Introduction. 1 ed: Maarten van Steen; 2010.
35. Buldyrev SV, Parshani R, Paul G, Stanley HE, Havlin S. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature. Vol. 464, p. 1025-1028, 2010.
36. Johansson J, Hassel H. An approach formodelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 95, p. 1335-1344, 2010.
37. Eusgeld I, Nan C. Creating a simulation environment for critical infrastructure interdependencies study. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, p. 2104-2108, Hong Kong, 2009.
38. Schläpfer M, Kessler T, Kröger W. Reliability Analysis of Electric Power Systems Using an Object-oriented Hybrid Modeling Approach. 16th power systems computation conference. Glasgow. 2008.
39. Min H-SJ, BeyelerW, Brown T, Son YJ, Jones AT. Toward modeling and simulation of critical national infrastructure interdependencies. IIE Transactions. Vol. 39, p. 57-71, 2007.
40. Di Giorgio A, Liberati F. Interdependency modeling and analysis of critical infrastructures based on Dynamic BayesianNetworks. 19thMediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED), p. 791-797, 2011.
41. HadjSaid N, Tranchita C, Rozel B, Viziteu M, Caire R. Modeling cyber and physical interdependencies - Application in ICT and power grids. Power Systems Conference and Exposition. p. 1-6, 2009.
42. D'Agostino G, Bologna S, Fioriti V, Casalicchio E, Brasca L, Ciapessoni E, et al. Methodologies for inter-dependency assessment. 5th International Conference on Critical Infrastructure (CRIS). p. 1-7, 2010.
43. Casalicchio E, Bologna S, Brasca L, Buschi S, Ciapessoni E, D'Agostino G, et al. Interdependency Assessment in the ICT-PS Network: The MIA Project Results. In: Xenakis C, Wolthusen S, editors. Critical Information Infrastructures Security: Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; p. 1-12, 2011.
44. Fioriti V, D'Agostino G, Bologna S. On Modeling and Measuring Inter-dependencies among Critical Infrastructures. Proceedings of the 2010 Complexity in Engineering: IEEE Computer Society, p. 85-87, 2010.
45. Bloomfield R, Chozos N, Nobles P. Infrastructure interdependency analysis: Introductory research review. 2009.
46. Gorbil G, Gelenbe E. Design of a Mobile Agent-Based Adaptive Communication Middleware for Federations of Critical Infrastructure Simulations. Proceedings of CRITIS 2009. 2009.
47. DoD. Department of Defense (DOD): High Level Architecture Interface Specification. 1998.
48. IEEE. IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation High Level Architecture (HLA)- Framework and Rules. IEEE Std 1516-2000, 2000.
49. Hopkinson KM,Giovanini R,Wang XR. EPOCHS: Integrated CommercialOff-the- Shelf Software ForAgent-based Electric Power and Communication Simulation. Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference. p. 1158-1166, 2003.
50. Rehtanz C. Autonomous systems and intelligent agents in power system control and operation: Springer; 2003.
51. Lees M, Logan B, Theodoropoulos G. Distributed Simulation of Agent-based Systems with HLA. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer, Simulation. Vol. 17(3), 2007.
52. Zhao Z, Albada DV, Sloot P. Agent-Based Flow Control for HLA Components. Simulation. Vol. 81, p. 487-501, 2005.
53. Beeker ER, Page EH. A Case Study of the Development and Use of a MANA-Based Federation for Studying U.S. Border Operations. Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Winter Simulation, p. 841-847, 2006.
54. Lieshout Fv, Cornelissen F, Neuteboom J. Simulating Rail Traffic Safety Systems using HLA 1516. Atos Origin Technical Automation; 2008.
55. Ezell BC. Infrastructure Vulnerability Assessment Model (I-VAM). Risk Analysis. Vol. 27, p. 571-583, 2007.
56. Möller B, Löfstrand B, Lindqvist J, Backlund A,Waller B, Virding R. Gaming and HLA 1516 Interoperability within the Swedish Defense. 2005 Fall Simulation InteroperabilityWorkshop. 2005.
57. Zacharewicz G, Alix T, Vallespir B. Services Modeling and Distributed Simulation DEVS / HLASupported. Proceedings of the 2009Winter SimulationConference (WSC). p. 3023-3035, 2009.
58. Nan C, Eusgeld I. Adopting HLA standard for interdependency study. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 96, p. 149-159, 2010.
59. Nan C, Kröger W, Probst P. Exploring critical infrastructure interdependnecy by hybrid simulation approach. ESREL 2011. p. 2483-2491, Troyes, France, 2011.
60. Nan C, Eusgeld I, KrögerW. Analyzing vulnerabilities between SCADA system and SUC due to interdependencies. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 113, p. 76-93, 2013.