The feasibility of telephone follow-up interviews for monitoring treatment outcomes of australian residential drug and alcohol treatment programs

Substance Abuse

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 21-29

  Deane, Frank P ^a   Kelly, Peter J ^a   Crowe, Trevor P ^a   Lyons, Geoffrey C B ^a   Cridland, Elizabeth K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

feasibility; follow up interviews; Substance use disorders; telephone follow up; treatment outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUSTRALIA; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROCEDURES; RESIDENTIAL HOME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AUSTRALIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897678104     PISSN: 08897077     EISSN: 15470164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2013.789815     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Horsfall J, Cleary M, Hunt GE. Developing partnerships in mental health to bridge the research-practitioner gap. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2011;47:6-12.
2. Rosenheck RA, Seibyl CL. A longitudinal perspective on monitoring outcomes of an innovative program. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56:301-307.
3. Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009;36:24-34.
4. Tansella M, Thornicroft G. Implementation science: understanding the translation of evidence into practice. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195: 283-285.
5. Mendel P, Meredith LS, Schoenbaum M, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. Interventions in organisational and community context: a framework for building evidence on dissemination and implementation in health services research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008;35:21-37.
6. Bootsmiller BJ, Ribisl KM, Mowbray CT, Davidson WS, Walton MA, Herman SE. Methods of ensuring high follow-up rates: lessons from a longitudinal study of dual diagnosed participants. Subst Use Misuse. 1998;33:2665-2685.
7. Oudejans SCC, Schippers GM, Merkx MJM, Schramade MH, Koeter MWJ, van den Brink W. Feasibility and validity of low-budget telephonic follow-up interviews in routine outcome monitoring of substance abuse treatment. Addiction. 2009;104:1138-1146.
8. Walton MA, Ramanathan CS, Reischl TM. Tracking substance abusers in longitudinal research: understanding follow-up contact difficulty. Am J Community Psychol. 1998;26:233-253.
9. Gerstein DR, Johnson RA. Nonresponse and selection bias in treatment follow-up studies. Subst Use Misuse. 2000;35:971-1014.
10. Tiet QQ, Byrnes HF, Barnett P, Finney JW. A practical system for monitoring the outcomes of substance use disorder patients. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30:337-347.
11. Corsi KF, Van Hunnik B, Kwiatowski CF, Booth RE. Computerized tracking and follow-up techniques in longitudinal research with drug users. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2006;6:101-110.
12. Moos RH, Finney JW, Suchinsky R. Outcomes Monitoring for Patients With Substance Use Disorders: IV. Cohort 2 Patients' 6-12 Month Treatment Outcomes. Palo Alto, CA: Program Evaluation and Resource Center and HSR&D Center for Health Care Evaluation; 2000.
13. Otilingram PG, Ritsher JB, Finney JW, Moos RH, Suchinsky R. Outcomes Monitoring for Patients With Substance Use Disorders: V. Cohort 3 Patients' Characteristics, Treatment, and Treatment Outcomes. Palo Alto, CA: Program Evaluation and Resource Center and HSR&D Center for Health Care Evaluation; 2002.
14. Moos RH, Finderman B, Finney JW, Suchinsky R. Outcomes Monitoring for Patients With Substance Use Disorders: III. Cohort 2 Patients' Characteristics and Treatment at Baseline. Palo Alto, CA: Program Evaluation and Resource Center and HSR&D Center for Health Care Evaluation; 1999.
15. Evans E, Hser YI. Pilot-testing a statewide outcome monitoring system: overview of the California Treatment Outcome Project (CALTOP). J Psychoactive Drugs. 2004;2(Suppl):109-114.
16. Rohrer JE, Vaughan MS, Cadoret R, Zwick J. Follow-up contact bias in evaluation of substance abuse treatment programs. Adm Policy Ment Health. 1999;26:207-212.
17. Flynn PM, Simpson DD, Anglin MD, Hubbard RL. Comment on 'Nonresponse and Selection Bias in Treatment Follow-up Studies.' Subst Use Misuse. 2001;36:1749-1751.
18. McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grissom G. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index [electronic edition]. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1995;9:199-213.
19. McKenzie M, Peterson Tulsky J, Long HJ, Chesney M. Tracking and follow-up of marginalised populations: a review. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1999;10:409-429.
20. Gordon R, Heim D, MacAskill S. Rethinking drinking cultures: a review of drinking cultures and a reconstructed dimensional approach. Public Health. 2012;126:3-11.
21. Ståhlbrandt H, Andersson C, Johnsson KO, Tollison SJ, Berglund M, Larimer ME. Cross-cultural patterns in college student drinking and its consequences-a comparison between the USA and Sweden. Alcohol Alcohol. 2006;41:i3-i7.
22. Vederhus J, Laudet A, Kristensen Ø, Clausen T. Obstacles to 12-step group participation as seen by addiction professionals: comparing Norway to the United States. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010;39:210-217.
23. Lundberg I, Thakker KD, Hällström T, Forsell Y. Determinants of non-participation, and the effects of non-participation on potential cause-effect relationships, in the PART study on mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005;40:475-483.
24. Cunradi CB, Moore R, Killoran M, Ames G. Survey nonresponse bias among young adults: the role of alcohol, tobacco, and drugs. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40:171-185.
25. Eckers RM. 'Cultural fraud': the role of culture in drug abuse. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2005;24:157-163.
26. Lawrinson P, Copeland J, Indig D. Development and validation of a brief instrument for routine outcome monitoring in opioid maintenance pharmacotherapy services: the Brief Treatment Outcome Measure (BTOM). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;80:125-133.
27. Alterman AI, Cacciola JS, Habing B, Lynch KG. Addiction severity index recent and lifetime summary indexes based on nonparametric item response theory methods. Psychol Assess. 2007;19:119-132.
28. Cacciola JS, Pecoraro A, Alterman AI. Development of ASI psychiatric severity cut-off scores to identify co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2008;6:77-92.
29. Currie SR, el-Guebaly N, Coulson R, Hodgins D, Mansley C. Factor validation of the addiction severity index scale structure in persons with concurrent disorders. Psychol Assess. 2004;16:326-329.
30. Enstrom C. Social workers ability to assess how clients experience investigation sessions-with and without the ASI. J Social Work. 2010;9:309-321.
31. Griffin ML, Kolodziej ME, Weiss RD. Measuring principle substance of abuse in comorbid patients for clinical research. Addict Behav. 2009;34:826-829.
32. Reelick NF, Wierdsma AI. The addiction severity index as a predictor of the use of mental health care. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20:214-218.
33. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33:335-343.
34. Sklar SM, Annis HM, Turner NE. Group comparisons of coping selfefficacy between alcohol and cocaine abusers seeking treatment. Psychol Addict Behav. 1999;13:123-133.
35. Clark D. Craving for alcohol. J Psychopharmacol. 1994;9:73-76.
36. Corrigan PW, Salver M, Ralph RO, Songster Y, Keck L. Examining the factor structure of the Recovery Assessment Scale. Schizophr Bull. 2004;30:1035-1041.
37. Scheier MF, Wrosch C, Baum A, et al. The life engagement test: assessing purpose in life. J Behav Med. 2006;29:291-298.
38. Keyes CLM, Wissing M, Potgieter JP, Temane M, Kruger A, van Rooy S. Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHCSF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2008;15:181-192.
39. De Leon G. Therapeutic communities for addictions: a theoretical framework. Int J Addict. 1995;30:1603-1645.
40. Schaler JA. Spiritual thinking in addiction-treatment providers: the Spiritual Belief Scale (SBS). Alcohol Treat Q. 1996;14:7-33.
41. Connors GJ, Tonigan JS, Miller WR. A measure of religious background and behavior for use in behavior change research. Psychol Addict Behav. 1996;10:90-96.
42. Underwood LG, Teresi JA. The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Ann Behav Med. 2002;24:22-33.
43. Thompson LY, R. SC, Michael ST, et al. Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;73:313-360.
44. Thompson LY, Snyder CR. Measuring forgiveness. In: Lopez SJ, Snyder CR, eds. Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2003:301-312.
45. Buss AH, Perry M. The Aggression Questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;63:452-459.
46. Ribisl KM, Walton MA, Mowbray CT, Luke DA, Davidson WS II, Bootsmiller BJ. Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: review and recommendations. Eval Program Plann. 1996;19:1-25.
47. Kertesz SG, Crouch K, Milby J, Cusimano RA, Schumacher J. Housing First for homeless persons with active addiction: are we overreaching? Milbank Q. 2009;87:495-534.
48. Brunette MF, Mueser KT, Drake RE. A review of research on residential programs for people with severe mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2004;23:471-481.
49. Passetti LL, Godley SH, Scott CK, Siekmann M. A low-cost followup resource: using the World Wide Web to maximize client location efforts. Am J Eval. 2000;21:195-203.
50. Mäkelä K. Studies of the reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index. Addiction. 2004;99:398-410.
51. Secades-Villa R, Fernandez-Hermida JR. The validity of selfreports in a follow-up study with drug addicts. Addict Behav. 2003;28:1175-1182.
52. Marcus B, Schutz A. Who are the people reluctant to participate in research? Personality correlates of four different types of nonresponse as inferred from self-and observer ratings. J Pers. 2005;73:959-984.
53. Harrison PA, Asche SE. Outcomes monitoring in Minnesota: treatment implications, practical limitations. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001;11:173-183.
54. Mortlock KS, Deane FP, Crowe TP. Screening for mental disorder comorbidity in Australian alcohol and other drug residential treatment settings. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011;40:397-404.