Proteomic characterization of equine cerebrospinal fluid

Journal of Equine Veterinary Science

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 451-458

  Broccardo, Carolyn J ^a   Hussey, Gisela Soboll ^b   Goehring, Lutz ^a   Lunn, Paul ^c   Prenni, Jessica E ^a  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebrospinal fluid; Equine; Gene ontology; Normalized spectral abundance factor; Proteomics

Indexed keywords

EQUIDAE;

EID: 84897667468     PISSN: 07370806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Kroksveen A.C., Opsahl J.A., Aye T.T., Ulvik R.J., Berven F.S. Proteomics of human cerebrospinal fluid: discovery and verification of biomarker candidates in neurodegenerative diseases using quantitative proteomics. JProteomics 2011, 74:371-388.
2. Stoop M.P., Coulier L., Rosenling T., Shi S., Smolinska A.M., Buydens L., et al. Quantitative proteomics and metabolomics analysis of normal human cerebrospinal fluid samples. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:2063-2075.
3. Goehring L.S., Kessels B.G., van Maanen C., Voorbij H.A., Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan M.M. Evaluation of nephelometry for albumin measurement in serum and cerebrospinal fluid: experiences with an indwelling subarachnoidal catheter system for repetitive cerebrospinal fluid collection in horses. JVet Diagn Invest 2006, 18:251-256.
4. Bradford M.M. Arapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72:248-254.
5. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem 2002, 74:5383-5392.
6. Nesvizhskii A.I., Keller A., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Astatistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2003, 75:4646-4658.
7. Elias J.E., Gygi S.P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 2007, 4:207-214.
8. Kall L., Storey J.D., MacCoss M.J., Noble W.S. Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. JProteome Res 2008, 7:29-34.
9. Vizcaino J.A., Cote R.G., Csordas A., Dianes J.A., Fabregat A., Foster J.M., et al. The proteomics identifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D1063-D1069.
10. Paoletti A.C., Parmely T.J., Tomomori-Sato C., Sato S., Zhu D., Conaway R.C., et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of distinct mammalian mediator complexes using normalized spectral abundance factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:18928-18933.