Why is Housing Always Satisfactory? A Study into the Impact of Cognitive Restructuring and Future Perspectives on Housing Appreciation

Social Indicators Research

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 353-371

  Jansen, Sylvia J T ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive dissonance reduction; Housing; Preference; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; HOUSING; PERCEPTION; RESIDENTIAL SATISFACTION;

EID: 84897650160     PISSN: 03038300     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0303-1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amérigo, M., & Aragonés, J. I. (1990). Residential satisfaction in council housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 313-325.
2. Amérigo, M., & Aragonés, J. I. (1997). A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 47-57.
3. Amos, O. M., Jr, Hitt, M. A., & Warner, L. (1982). Life satisfaction and regional development: A case study of Oklahoma. Social Indicators Research, 11, 319-331.
4. Aragonés, J. I., Amérigo, M., & Sukhwani, S. (1992). Las influencias des diseno de la vivienda en la conducta. Un estudio de viviendas adjudicadas. Madrid: Universidad Complutense. (report not published).
5. Boumeester, H., Coolen, H., Goetgeluk, R., Jansen, S., Molin, E., Dol, K., et al. (2008a). Module Consumentengedrag WoON (eindrapport). Delft: Onderzoeksinstituut OTB.
6. Boumeester, H. J. F. M., Hoekstra, J. S. C. M., Meesters, J., & Coolen, H. C. C. H. (2005). Woonwensen nader in kaart: de woonbeleving van bewoners. Voorburg: NVB.
7. Boumeester, H. J. F. M., Mariën, A. A. A., Rietdijk, N., & Nuss, F. A. H. (2008b). Huizenkopers in Profiel. Onderzoek naar wensen van potentiële huizenkopers. Voorburg: NVB.
8. Bourne, L. S. (1981). The geography of housing. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.
9. Brown, L. A., & Moore, E. G. (1970). The intra-urban migration process: A perspective. Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography, 52, 1-13.
10. Christensen, D. L., & Carp, F. M. (1987). PEQI-based environmental predictors of the residential satisfaction of older women. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7, 45-64.
11. Cummings, W. H., & Venkatesan, M. (1976). Cognitive-dissonance and consumer-behavior-Review of evidence. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 303-308.
12. Feldman, R. M. (1990). Settlement-identity: Psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society. Environment and Behavior, 22, 183-229.
13. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
14. Fine-davis, M., & Davis, E. E. (1982). Predictors of satisfaction with environmental-quality in 8 European-countries. Social Indicators Research, 11, 341-362.
15. Fleury-Bahi, G., Félonneau, M.-L., & Marchand, D. (2008). Processes of place identification and residential satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 669-682.
16. Floor, H., & van Kempen, R. (1994). Wonen op maat. In I. Smid & H. Priemus (Eds.), Bewonerspreferenties: Richtsnoer voor investeringen in nieuwbouw en de woningvoorraad. Delft: Delftse Universitaire Pers.
17. Floor, H., van Kempen, R., & de Vocht, A. (1996). Leaving Randstad Holland: An analysis of housing preferences with decision plan nets. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 11, 275-296.
18. Galster, G. C., & Hesser, G. W. (1981). Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13, 735-758.
19. Goetgeluk, R. (1997). Bomen over wonen, woningmarktonderzoek met beslissingsbomen (Ph. D. Dissertation). Utrecht Geographical Studies, 235. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
20. Heidemeier, H., & Staudinger, U. M. (2012). Self-evaluation processes in life satisfaction: Uncovering measurement non-equivalence and age-related differences. Social Indicators Research, 105(1), 39-61.
21. Heins, S. (2002). Rural residential environments in city and countryside: Countryside images, demand for and supply of rural residential environments (Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Utrecht). Delft: Uitgeverij Eburon.
22. Jansen, S. J. T. (2012 online first). Why is housing always satisfactory? A study into the impact of preference and experience on housing appreciation. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10. 1007/s11205-012-0114-9.
23. Jansen, S., Boumeester, H., Coolen, H., Goetgeluk, R., & Molin, E. (2009). The impact of including images in a conjoint measurement task: Results of two small-scale studies. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24, 271-297.
24. Landale, N. S., & Guest, A. M. (1985). Constraints, satisfaction and residential mobility: Speare's model reconsidered. Demography, 22(2), 199-222.
25. Marcuse, P. (1971). Social indicators and housing policy. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 7, 193-217.
26. Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Nibud. (2008). Budget Handboek 2008-1: Kerncijfers huishoudfinanciën. Utrecht: Nibud.
28. Permentier, M., Bolt, G., & van Ham, M. (2011). Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction and perception of neighborhood reputation. Urban Studies, 48, 977-996.
29. Priemus, H. (1984). Nederlandse woontheorieen. Volkshuisvesting in theorie en praktijk. Delft: Delftse Universitaire Pers.
30. Priemus, H. (1986). Housing as a social adaptation process: A conceptual scheme. Environment and Behavior, 18, 31-52.
31. Schwanen, T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2004). The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 759-784.
32. St. John, C., & Clark, F. (1984). Racial differences in dimensions of neighborhood satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 15, 43-60.
33. Vasanen, A. (2012). Beyond stated and revealed preferences: The relationship between residential preferences and housing choices in the urban region of Turku, Finland. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27, 301-315.
34. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction-research. Social Indicators Research, 37, 1-46.
35. Wu, C. H. (2008). The role of perceived discrepancy in satisfaction evaluation. Social Indicators Research, 88, 423-436.