Beyond stated and revealed preferences: The relationship between residential preferences and housing choices in the urban region of Turku, Finland

Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 301-315

  Vasanen, Antti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Housing choice; Population distribution; Residential mobility; Residential preference; Urban region

Indexed keywords

QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY; RESIDENTIAL SATISFACTION; URBAN AREA; URBAN HOUSING; URBAN POPULATION;

FINLAND; TURKU; VARSINAIS-SUOMI;

EID: 84865417551     PISSN: 15664910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10901-012-9267-8     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ærø, T. (2006). Residential choice from a lifestyle perspective. Housing, Theory and Society, 23, 109-130.
2. Åslund, O. (2005). Now and forever? Initial and subsequent location choices of immigrants. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 141-165.
3. Bayoh, I., Irwin, E. G., & Haab, T. (2006). Determinants of residential location choice: How important are local public goods in attracting homeowners to central city locations? Journal of Regional Science, 46, 97-120.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1999). Site effects. In P. Bourdieu, et al. (Eds.), The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (pp. 123-129). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
5. Bouzarovski, S., Haase, A., Hall, R., Steinführer, A., Kabisch, S., & Odgen, P. E. (2010). Household structure, migration trends, and residential preferences in inner-city León, Spain: Unpacking the demographies of reurbanization. Urban Geography, 31, 211-235.
6. Clark, W. A. V. (1989). Revealed preferences and neighborhood transitions in a multi-ethnic setting. Urban Geography, 10, 434-448.
7. Clark, W. A. V. (2009). Changing residential preferences across income, education, and age: Findings from the multi-city study of urban inequality. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 334-355.
8. Coolen, H., & Hoekstra, J. (2001). Values as determinants of preference for housing attributes. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, 285-306.
9. Dempsey, N. (2010). Revisiting the compact city? Built Environment, 36, 5-8.
10. Dieleman, F. M., & Mulder, C. H. (2002). The geography of residential choice. In J. I. Aragonés, G. Francescato, & T. Gärling (Eds.), Residential environments: Choice, satisfaction, and behavior (pp. 35-54). Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
11. Dökmeci, V., & Berköz, L. (2000). Residential-location preferences according to demographic characteristics in Istanbul. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 45-55.
12. Feijten, P. (2005). Life events and the housing career: A retrospective analysis of timed effects. Delft: Eburon.
13. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Fielding, A. J. (1992). Migration and social mobility: South East England as an escalator region. Regional Studies, 26, 1-15.
15. George, D. (2001). Preference pollution: How markets create the desires we dislike. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
16. Ihlanfeldt, K. R., & Scafidi, B. (2002). Black self-segregation as a cause of housing segregation: Evidence from the multi-city study of urban inequality. Journal of Urban Economics, 51, 366-390.
17. Juntto, A. (2007). Suomalaisten asumistoiveet ja mahdollisuudet. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
18. Karsten, L. (2007). Housing as a way of life: Towards an understanding of middle-class families' preference for an urban residential location. Housing Studies, 22, 83-98.
19. Kim, J. H., Pagliara, F., & Preston, J. (2005a). The intention to move and residential location choice behaviour. Urban Studies, 42, 1621-1636.
20. Kim, T.-J., Horner, M. W., & Marans, R. W. (2005b). Life cycle and environmental factors in selecting residential and job location. Housing Studies, 20, 457-473.
21. Kortteinen, M., Tuominen, M., & Vaattovaara, M. (2005). Asumistoiveet, sosiaalinen epäjärjestys ja kaupunkisuunnittelu pääkaupunkiseudulla [Housing desires, social disorder and urban planning in the Helsinki region]. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, 70, 121-131.
22. Mulder, C. H. (1996). Housing choice: Assumptions and approaches. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 11, 209-232.
23. Mulder, C. H., & Cooke, T. J. (2009). Family ties and residential locations. Population, Space and Place, 15, 299-304.
24. Myers, D., & Gearin, E. (2001). Current preferences and future demand for denser residential environments. Housing Policy Debate, 12, 633-659.
25. Niedomysl, T. (2008). Residential preferences for interregional migration in Sweden: Demographic, socioeconomic, and geographical determinants. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1109-1131.
26. Pérez, P. E., Martínez, F. J., & de Dios Ortúzar, J. (2003). Microeconomic formulation and estimation of a residential location choice model: Implications for the value of time. Journal of Regional Science, 43, 771-789.
27. Rossi, P. H. (1980). Why families move (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
28. Schwanen, T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2004). The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 759-784.
29. Skifter Andersen, H. (2008). Why do residents want to leave deprived neighbourhoods? The importance of residents' subjective evaluations of their neighbourhood and its reputation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 23, 79-101.
30. South, S. J., & Crowder, K. D. (1998). Housing discrimination and residential impacts for blacks and whites. Population Research and Policy Review, 17, 369-387.
31. Storper, M., & Manville, M. (2006). Behaviour, preference and cities: Urban theory and urban resurgence. Urban Studies, 43, 1247-1274.
32. Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (2009). Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 147-167.
33. Strandell, A. (2005). Asukasbarometri 2004. Asukaskysely suomalaisista asuinympäristöistä [The residents' barometer 2004. Residents' survey on residential environments in Finland]. The Finnish Environment, 746, 1-145.
34. Timmermans, H., Molin, E., & van Noortwijk, L. (1994). Housing choice process: Stated versus revealed modelling approached. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 9, 215-227.
35. van Diepen, A. M. L., & Musterd, S. (2009). Lifestyles and the city: Connecting daily life to urbanity. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24, 331-345.
36. van Ham, M., & Feijten, P. (2008). Who wants to leave the neighbourhood? The effect of being different from the neighbourhood population on the wishes to move. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1151-1170.
37. Vasanen, A. (2009). Deconcentration versus spatial clustering: Changing population distribution in the Turku urban region, 1980-2005. Fennia, 187, 115-127.