Creating the Future Together: Toward a Framework for Research Synthesis in Entrepreneurship

Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 369-397

  Van Burg, Elco ^a   Romme, A Georges L ^b  

^a VU University   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897632027     PISSN: 10422587     EISSN: 15406520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/etap.12092     Document Type: Article

References (156)

1. Aldrich, H.E. (2010). Beam me up, Scott(ie)! Institutional theorists' struggles with the emergent nature of entrepreneurship. Research in the Sociology of Work, 21, 329-364.
2. Aldrich, H.E. & Fiol, C.M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670.
3. Aldrich, H.E. & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving. London: Sage Publications.
4. Alvarez, S.A. & Barney, J.B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1-2), 11-26.
5. Alvarez, S.A. & Barney, J.B. (2010). Entrepreneurship and epistemology: The philosophical underpinnings of the study of entrepreneurial opportunities. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 557-583.
6. Alvarez, S.A., Barney, J.B., & Young, S.L. (2010). Debates in entrepreneurship: Opportunity formation and implications for the field of entrepreneurship. In Z.J. Acs & D.B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (Vol. 5, pp. 23-45). New York: Springer.
7. Anderson, P.J.J., Blatt, R., Christianson, M.K., Grant, A.M., Marquis, C., Neuman, E.J., etal. (2006). Understanding mechanisms in organizational research: Reflections from a collective journey. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 102-113.
8. Arenius, P. & De Clercq, D. (2005). A network-based approach on opportunity recognition. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 249-265.
9. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain Smith, D. (1985). Action science. London: Jossey-Bass.
10. Baron, R.A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic "why" questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221-239.
11. Baron, R.A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 328-340.
12. Baron, R.A. & Ensley, M.D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52(9), 1331-1344.
13. Baron, R.A., Hmieleski, K.M., & Henry, R.A. (2012). Entrepreneurs' dispositional positive affect: The potential benefits-and potential costs-of being "up." Journal of Business Venturing, 27(3), 310-324.
14. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65-107.
15. Berglund, H. (2007). Opportunities as existing and created: A study of entrepreneurs in the Swedish mobile internet industry. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 15(3), 243-273.
16. Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., van Tilburg, A., & van de Bunt, G.G. (2010). How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), 245-260.
17. Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Hassocks, U.K.: Harvester Press.
18. Bower, D.J. (2003). Business model fashion and the academic spinout firm. R&D Management, 33(2), 97-106.
19. Briner, R. & Denyer, D. (2012). Evidence synthesis as a scholarship and practice tool. In D.M. Rousseau (Ed.), Handbook of evidence-based management: Companies, classrooms, and research (pp. 112-129). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Busenitz, L.W., Moesel, D.D., Fiet, J.O., & Barney, J.B. (1997). The framing of perceptions of fairness in the relationship between venture capitalists and new venture teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(3), 5-21.
21. Bygrave, W.D. (2007). The entrepreneurship paradigm (I) revisited. In H. Neergaard & J. Parm Ulhøi (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods in entrepreneurship (pp. 17-48). Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishing.
22. Cairns, G. & Śliwa, M. (2008). The implications of Aristotle's phronēsis for organizational inquiry. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 318-328). London: Sage Publications.
23. Chia, R. (1996). Teaching paradigm shifting in management education: University business schools and the entrepreneurial imagination. Journal of Management Studies, 33(4), 409-428.
24. Chiasson, M. & Saunders, C. (2005). Reconciling diverse approaches to opportunity research using the structuration theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 747-767.
25. Chiles, T.H., Bluedorn, A.C., & Gupta, V.K. (2007). Beyond creative destruction and entrepreneurial discovery: A radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28(4), 467-493.
26. Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1084-1093.
27. Cooper, S.Y. & Park, J.S. (2008). The impact of "incubator" organizations on opportunity recognition and technology innovation in new, entrepreneurial high-technology ventures. International Small Business Journal, 26(1), 27-56.
28. Corley, K.G. & Gioia, D.A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12-32.
29. Cornelissen, J.P. & Clarke, J.S. (2010). Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: Inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 539-557.
30. Corner, P.D. & Ho, M. (2010). How opportunities develop in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 635-659.
31. Coviello, N.E. & Jones, M.V. (2004). Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 485-508.
32. Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49-55.
33. Davidsson, P. (2003). The domain of entrepreneurship research: Some suggestions. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 6, 315-372.
34. Davidsson, P. (2008). The entrepreneurship research challenge. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
35. Davis, G.F. & Marquis, C. (2005). Prospects for organization theory in the early twenty-first century: Institutional fields and mechanisms. Organization Science, 16(4), 332-343.
36. Delmar, F. & Shane, S. (2003). Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1165-1185.
37. Dencker, J.C., Gruber, M., & Shah, S.K. (2009). Individual and opportunity factors influencing job creation in new firms. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1125-1147.
38. Denison, D.R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 619-654.
39. Denyer, D. & Tranfield, D. (2006). Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision, 44(2), 213-227.
40. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & Van Aken, J.E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29(3), 393-413.
41. Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S.D., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 287-309.
42. Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: Minton, Balch & Company. Reprinted in: Dewey, J. (1984). The later works: 1925-1953, volume 4: 1929 (pp. 1-254). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
43. DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
44. Dimov, D. (2007). From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: The importance of person-situation learning match. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 561-583.
45. Dimov, D. (2010). Nascent entrepreneurs and venture emergence: Opportunity confidence, human capital, and early planning. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1123-1153.
46. Dimov, D. (2011). Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 57-81.
47. Downing, S. (2005). The social construction of entrepreneurship: Narrative and dramatic processes in the coproduction of organizations and identities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(2), 185-204.
48. Durand, R. & Vaara, E. (2009). Causation, counterfactuals, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1245-1264.
49. Dyer, J.H., Gregersen, H.B., & Christensen, C. (2008). Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(4), 317-338.
50. Eckhardt, J.T. & Shane, S.A. (2011). Industry changes in technology and complementary assets and the creation of high-growth firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 412-430.
51. Elfring, T. & Hulsink, W. (2003). Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 409-422.
52. Ellis, P.D. (2010). Social ties and international entrepreneurship: Opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 99-127.
53. Fletcher, D.E. (2006). Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18(5), 421-440.
54. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Foss, N.J., Klein, P.G., Kor, Y.Y., & Mahoney, J.T. (2008). Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource-based view: Toward a new synthesis. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(1), 73-94.
56. Frese, M., Bausch, A., Schmidt, P., Strauch, A., & Kabst, R. (2012). Evidence-based entrepreneurship: Cumulative science, action principles, and bridging the gap between science and practice. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 8, 1-62.
57. Gaglio, C.M. (2004). The role of mental simulations and counterfactual thinking in the opportunity identification process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(6), 533-552.
58. Gaglio, C.M. & Katz, J.A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2), 95-111.
59. Gartner, W.B. (2007a). Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Blind assumptions in theory development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 27-39.
60. Gartner, W.B. (2007b). Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 613-627.
61. Gartner, W.B., Shaver, K.G., & Liao, J. (2008). Opportunities as attributions: Categorizing strategic issues from an attributional perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(4), 301-315.
62. Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957-969.
63. Garud, R. & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32, 277-300.
64. Geyskens, I., Krishnan, R., Steenkamp, J.B.E.M., & Cunha, P.V. (2009). A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management, 35(2), 393-419.
65. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
66. Grégoire, D.A., Barr, P.S., & Shepherd, D.A. (2010). Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition: The role of structural alignment. Organization Science, 21(2), 413-431.
67. Gross, N. (2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 358-379.
68. Haber, S. & Reichel, A. (2007). The cumulative nature of the entrepreneurial process: The contribution of human capital, planning and environment resources to small venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 119-145.
69. Hedström, P. & Swedberg, R. (1996). Social mechanisms. Acta Sociologica, 39(3), 281-308.
70. Hedström, P. & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 49-67.
71. Hildebrand, D.L. (2003). Beyond realism and antirealism: John Dewey and the neopragmatists. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
72. Hjorth, D. (2007). Lessons from lago: Narrating the event of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 712-732.
73. Hjorth, D. & Steyaert, C. (2005). Narrative and discursive approaches in entrepreneurship: A second movements in entrepreneurship book. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishing.
74. Hoskisson, R.E., Covin, J., Volberda, H.W., & Johnson, R.A. (2011). Revitalizing entrepreneurship: The search for new research opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1141-1168.
75. Ireland, R.D., Webb, J.W., & Coombs, J.E. (2005). Theory and methodology in entrepreneurship research. In D.J. Ketchen, Jr., & D.D. Bergh (Eds.), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (pp. 111-141). Oxford: Elsevier.
76. Jack, S.L. (2010). Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 120-137.
77. Jack, S.L. & Anderson, A.R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 467-487.
78. Katz, J. & Gartner, W.B. (1988). Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 429-441.
79. Khavul, S., Bruton, G.D., & Wood, E. (2009). Informal family business in Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1219-1238.
80. Kontinen, T. & Ojala, A. (2011). International opportunity recognition among small and medium-sized family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(3), 490-514.
81. Kuorikoski, J. & Pöyhönen, S. (2012). Looping kinds and social mechanisms. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 187-205.
82. Kwan, K.-M. & Tsang, E.W.K. (2001). Realism and constructivism in strategy research: A critical realist response to Mir and Watson. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1163-1168.
83. Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality. London: Routledge.
84. Leitch, C.M., Hill, F.M., & Harrison, R.T. (2010). The philosophy and practice of interpretivist research in entrepreneurship. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 67-84.
85. Levie, J. & Autio, E. (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 235-263.
86. Luksha, P. (2008). Niche construction: The process of opportunity creation in the environment. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(4), 269-283.
87. Martinez, M.A. & Aldrich, H.E. (2011). Networking strategies for entrepreneurs: Balancing cohesion and diversity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 17(1), 7-38.
88. McKelvie, A. & Wiklund, J. (2010). Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 261-288.
89. McMullen, J.S. & Shepherd, D.A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132-152.
90. Merton, R.K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
91. Miller, K.D. & Tsang, E.W.K. (2011). Testing management theories: Critical realist philosophy and research methods. Strategic Management Journal, 32(2), 139-158.
92. Mole, K.F. & Mole, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship as the structuration of individual and opportunity: A response using a critical realist perspective: Comment on Sarason, Dean and Dillard. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 230-237.
93. Mowery, D.C.N. & Ziedonis, A.A. (2004). Ivory tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
94. Nanda, R. & Sørensen, J.B. (2010). Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(7), 1116-1126.
95. Nicolaou, N. & Birley, S. (2003). Social networks in organizational emergence: The university spinout phenomenon. Management Science, 49(12), 1702-1725.
96. Ozgen, E. & Baron, R.A. (2007). Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 174-192.
97. Pajunen, K. (2008). The nature of organizational mechanisms. Organization Studies, 29(11), 1449-1468.
98. Palich, L.E. & Bagby, D.R. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 425-438.
99. Park, J.S. (2005). Opportunity recognition and product innovation in entrepreneurial hi-tech start-ups: A new perspective and supporting case study. Technovation, 25(7), 739-752.
100. Pawson, R. (2000). Middle-range realism. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 41(2), 283-325.
101. Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based policy: The promise of "realist synthesis." Evaluation, 8(3), 340-358.
102. Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage Publications.
103. Pentland, B.T. (1999). Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 711-724.
104. Ramos-Rodríguez, A.-R., Medina-Garrido, J.-A., Lorenzo-Gómez, J.-D., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2010). What you know or who you know? The role of intellectual and social capital in opportunity recognition. International Small Business Journal, 28(6), 566-582.
105. Reed, M. (2008). Exploring Plato's cave: Critical realism in the study of organization and management. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 68-78). London: Sage Publications.
106. Rindova, V., Barry, D., & Ketchen, D.J. (2009). Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 477-491.
107. Romme, A.G.L. (2003). Making a difference: Organization as design. Organization Science, 14(5), 558-573.
108. Rousseau, D.M. (2006). Is there such a thing as "evidence-based management"? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 256-269.
109. Rousseau, D.M. (2012). Designing a better business school: Channelling Herbert Simon, addressing the critics, and developing actionable knowledge for professionalizing managers. Journal of Management Studies, 49(3), 600-618.
110. Rousseau, D.M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 475-515.
111. Samuelsson, M. & Davidsson, P. (2009). Does venture opportunity variation matter? Investigating systematic process differences between innovative and imitative new ventures. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 229-255.
112. Sarason, Y., Dean, T., & Dillard, J.F. (2006). Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(3), 286-305.
113. Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243-263.
114. Sarasvathy, S.D. (2003). Entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 203-220.
115. Sarasvathy, S.D. (2004). Making it happen: Beyond theories of the firm to theories of firm design. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(6), 519-531.
116. Sarasvathy, S.D. & Dew, N. (2005). New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(5), 533-565.
117. Sarasvathy, S.D., Dew, N., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2008). Designing organizations that design environments: Lessons from entrepreneurial expertise. Organization Studies, 29(3), 331-350.
118. Sarasvathy, S.D., Forster, W.R., & Ramesh, A. (2013). From Goldilocks to Gump: A research agenda for entrepreneurial mechanisms design. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, forthcoming.
119. Sarasvathy, S.D. & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship as method: Open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 113-135.
120. Sayer, R.A. (2000). Realism and social science. London: Sage Publications.
121. Schumpeter, J. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
122. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
123. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469.
124. Shane, S. (2001). Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47(2), 205-220.
125. Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual opportunity nexus. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
126. Shane, S. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Delivering on the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 10-20.
127. Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
128. Shepherd, D.A. & DeTienne, D.R. (2005). Prior knowledge, potential financial reward, and opportunity identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 91-112.
129. Short, J.C., Ketchen, D.J., Shook, C.L., & Ireland, R.D. (2010). The concept of "opportunity" in entrepreneurship research: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 36(1), 40-65.
130. Simon, H.A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
131. Sine, W.D. & Lee, B.H. (2009). Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 123-155.
132. Smith, B.R., Matthews, C.H., & Schenkel, M.T. (2008). Differences in entrepreneurial opportunities: The role of tacitness and codification in opportunity identification. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(1), 38-57.
133. Stevenson, H.H. & Jarillo, J.C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17-27.
134. Stuart, T. & Sorenson, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32(2), 229-253.
135. Stuart, T.E. & Sorenson, O. (2007). Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3-4), 211-227.
136. Tang, J. & Kacmar, K.M., & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 77-94.
137. Tominc, P. & Rebernik, M. (2007). Growth aspirations and cultural support for entrepreneurship: A comparison of post-socialist countries. Small Business Economics, 28(2), 239-255.
138. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.
139. Tsoukas, H. (1989). The validity of idiographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 551-561.
140. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2007). Opportunity identification and pursuit: Does an entrepreneur's human capital matter? Small Business Economics, 30(2), 153-173.
141. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2009). The extent and nature of opportunity identification by experienced entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(2), 99-115.
142. Van Aken, J.E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219-246.
143. Van Burg, E., Romme, A.G.L., Gilsing, V.A., & Reymen, I.M.M.J. (2008). Creating university spin-offs: A science-based design perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 114-128.
144. Van de Ven, A.H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
145. Van de Ven, A.H. & Johnson, P.E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802-821.
146. Van Gelderen, M. (2010). A heuristic-inducing method for generating initial ideas for opportunities: An application to the Australasian dating market. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 18(02), 139-166.
147. Venkataraman, S., Sarasvathy, S.D., Dew, N., & Forster, W.R. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 21-33.
148. Weick, K.E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford: Blackwell.
149. Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship: Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165-184.
150. Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., & Wright, M. (2009). Information search and opportunity identification: The importance of prior business ownership experience. International Small Business Journal, 27(6), 659-680.
151. Wiklund, J. & Shepherd, D.A. (2011). Where to from here? EO-as-experimentation, failure, and distribution of outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 925-946.
152. Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen a theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
153. Ylikoski, P. (2012). Micro, macro, and mechanisms. In H. Kicaid (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of social science (pp. 21-45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
154. Zahra, S.A. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 443-452.
155. Zahra, S.A. & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship's next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67-83.
156. Zahra, S.A., Yavuz, R.I., & Ucbasaran, D. (2006). How much do you trust me? The dark side of relational trust in new business creation in established companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(4), 541-559.