Multidisciplinary convergence about "product-use" couple: Intermediary object's structure

Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED

Volumn 5 DS75-05, Issue , 2013, Pages 21-30

  Mahdjoub, Morad ^a   Al Khatib, Ahmad ^a   Bluntzer, Jean Bernard ^a   Sagot, Jean Claude ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE BELFORT MONTBÉLIARD   (France)

Author keywords

Collaborative design; Design for ergonomics; Design process; Intermediary objects; Multidisciplinary convergence

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; COLLABORATIVE WORK PRACTICE; DESIGN PROCESS; INTERMEDIARY OBJECTS; MULTIDISCIPLINARY CONVERGENCES; PRODUCT DESIGN PROCESS; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; USER-CENTERED DESIGN APPROACHES;

ERGONOMICS; PRODUCT DESIGN; VIRTUAL REALITY;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 84897622773     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Vallette, T., Roussel, B., Millet, D. and Duchamp, R. (2003) Usage and ergonomics as common reference point for cooperation and innovation among disciplines. 12th international conference on management of technology: IAMOT, Nancy, France.
2. Sanders, E.B.-N. and Stappers, P.J. (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, Vol. 4, No.1, pp.5-18.
3. Boujut, J.F. and Laureillard, P. (2002) A co-operation framework for product-process integration in engineering design. Design Studies, Vol. 23, pp.497-513.
4. Cross, N. (2008) Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. UK: Wiley.
5. Lu, S.Y., Elmaraghy, W., Schuh, G. and Wilhelm, R. (2007) A scientific foundation of collaborative engineering. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 56, pp.605 -634.
6. Détienne, F., Martin, G. and Lavigne, E. (2005) Viewpoints in co-design: A field study in concurrent engineering. Design Studies, Vol.26, No.1, pp. 215-241.
7. Badke-Schaub, P., Neumann, A., Lauche, K. and Mohammed, S. (2012) Mental models in design teams: A valid approach to performance in design collaboration?. CoDesign, Vol. 3, No.1, pp.5-20.
8. Hey, J.H.G., Joyce, C.K. and Beckman, S.L. (2007) Framing innovation: negotiating shared frames during early design phases. Journal of Design Research, Vol.6, No.1-2, pp.79-99.
9. Vinck, D. and Jeantet, A. (1995) Mediating and Commissioning Objects in the Sociotechnical Process of Product Design: A Conceptual Approach. in MacLean D., Saviotti P. and Vinck D. (eds.) Management and New Technology: Design, Networks and Strategy. COST Social Science Series.
10. Star, S. and Griesemer, J. (1989) Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social studies of science, Vol.19, pp.387-420.
11. Broberg, O., Andersen, V., and Seim, R. (2011) Participatory ergonomics in design processes: The role of boundary objects. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 42, pp.464-472.
12. Vinck, D. (2009), De l'objet intermédiaire à l'objet frontière. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances, SAC, 3, pp.51-72.
13. Wang, G.G. (2002) Definition and Review of Virtual Prototyping. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., Vol. 2, No.3, pp. 232-237.
14. Germani, M., Mengoni, M. and Peruzzini, (2012) An approach to assessing virtual environments for synchronous and remote collaborative design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 26, pp.793-813.
15. Bennes, L., Bazzaro, F., and Sagot, J. (2012) Virtual reality as a support tool for ergonomic-style convergence: multidisciplinary interaction design methodology and case study. in the proceedings of the 2012 Virtual Reality International Conference.