The rules of engagement: Comparing two social protest movements on YouTube

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 133-140

  Vraga, Emily K ^a   Bode, Leticia ^b   Wells, Chris ^c   Driscoll, Kevin ^d   Thorson, Kjerstin ^d  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; POLITICS; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL STATUS; VIDEORECORDING;

GOALS; HUMANS; POLITICS; SOCIAL CONDITIONS; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL VALUES; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84897594039     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0117     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Shirky C. Political power of social media-Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs 2011; 28:32
2. Lange PG. Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 13:361-380
3. Papacharissi Z. (2009) The virtual sphere 2.0: The Internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In Chadwick A, ed. Routledge handbook of Internet politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 230-245
4. Bennett CW, Breunig C, Givens T. Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of the anti-Iraq War demonstrates in the U.S. Political Communication 2008; 25:269-289
5. Van Laer J, Van Aelst P. Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, Communication, & Society 2010; 13:1146-1171
6. Bimber B, Flanagin AJ, Stohl C. Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory 2005; 15:365-388
7. Carlson T, Strandberg K. Riding the Web 2.0 wave: Candidates on YouTube in the 2007 Finnish national elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 2008; 5:159-174
8. Gulati GJ, Williams, CB. Congressional candidates' use of YouTube in 2008: Its frequency and rationale. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 2010; 7:93-109
9. Obar JA, Zube P, Lampe C. Advocacy 2.0: An analysis of how advocacy groups in the United States perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic engagement and collective action. Journal of Information Policy 2012; 2:1-25
10. Thorson K, Ekdale B, Borah P, et al. YouTube and Proposition 8: A case study in video activism. Information, Communication & Society 2010; 13:325-349
11. Thorson K, Driscoll K, Ekdale B, et al. YouTube, Twitter, and the occupy movement connecting content and circulation practices. Information, Communication, and Society 2013; 16:421-451
12. Treré E. (2011) Studying media practices in social movements. CIRN Prato Community Informatics Conference, Prato, Italy
13. Macafee T, De Simone JJ. Killing the bill online?. Pathways to young people's protest engagement via social media. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2012; 15:579-584
14. Earl J. The dynamics of protest-related diffusion on the web. Information, Communication, & Society 2010; 13:209-225
15. Earl J, Kimport K, Prieto G, et al. Changing the world one webpage at a time: Conceptualizing and explaining Internet activism. Mobilization: An International Journal 2010; 15:425-446
16. Olson M. (1965) The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
17. Benkler Y. (2006) The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
18. Sayre B, Bode L, Wilcox D, et al. Agenda setting in a digital age: Tracking attention to California Proposition 8 in social media, online news, and conventional news. Policy & Internet 2010; 2:7-32
19. Beck U. (1999) World risk society. Cambridge: Polity
20. Bennett W. The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. Political Science & Politics 1998; 31:741-761
21. Reynolds J. (2008) The single woman: A discursive investigation. New York: Taylor & Francis
22. Giddens A. (1991) Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
23. Rainie L, Wellman B. (2012) Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
24. Wojcieszak M, Rojas H. Correlates of party, ideology and issue based extremity in an era of egocentric publics. International Journal of Press/Politics 2011; 16:488-507
25. Karpf D. Macaca moments reconsidered: Electoral panopticon or netroots mobilization?. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 2010; 7:143-162
26. Kreiss D, Tufekci Z. Occupying the political: Occupy Wall Street, collective action and the rediscovery of pragmatic politics. Cultural Studies4Critical Methodologies 2013; 13:1-5
27. Dolan M. California Supreme Court looks unlikely to kill Proposition 8. Los Angeles Times, Mar. 6, 2009. www.latimes .com/news/local/la-me-prop8- supreme-court6-2009mar06,0, 798075.story-court6-2009mar06,0,798075.story (accessed Aug 15, 2009
28. Wasserman T. (2013). YouTube: Super Bowl ads shown before the game get 600% more views. Mashable.com. http://mashable.com/2013/01/28/youtube-super- bowl-Ads-moreviews/(accessed Feb. 12, 2013
29. Hanson GL, Haridakis PM, Sharma R. Differing uses of YouTube during the 2008 U.S. presidential primary election. Electronic News 2011; 5:1-19
30. Corteses J, Proffit JM. Looking back as we prepare to move forward: US presidential candidates' adoption of YouTube. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2012; 15:693-697
31. YouTube statistics. (2013) www.youtube.com/t/press-statistics (accessed Feb. 12, 2013
32. Oreskovic A. (2013). Exclusive: YouTube hits 4 billion Daily video views. www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/23/us-googleyoutube-idUSTRE80M0TS20120123 (accessed Jan. 29, 2013
33. Shah, C. TubeKit-A query-based YouTube crawling toolkit. Bulletin of IEEE Technical Committee on Digital Libraries 2009; 5(1
34. Shah, C. ContextMiner: Supporting the mining of contextual information for ephemeral digital video preservation. International Journal of Digital Curation 2009; 4(2
35. Moore K. (2011) 71% of online adults now use video-sharing sites. Pew Internet Project. http://pewinternet.org/./media/Files/Reports/2011/ Video%20sharing%202011.pdf (accessed Jan. 29, 2013
36. Hampton KN, Goulet LS, Rainie L, et al. (2011) Social networking sites and our lives: How people's trust, personal relationships, and civic and political involvement are connected to their use of social networking sites and other technologies. Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/./media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP%20- %20Social%20networking%20sites% 20and%20our%20lives.pdf (accessed Feb. 5, 2013