Acts, Persons, and Intuitions: Person-Centered Cues and Gut Reactions to Harmless Transgressions

Social Psychological and Personality Science

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 279-285

  Uhlmann, Eric Luis ^a   Zhu, Luke Lei ^b  

^a HEC PARIS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

act person dissociations; informational value; moral dumbfounding; moral intuitions; person centered moral judgments; social intuitionist model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897585170     PISSN: 19485506     EISSN: 19485514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1948550613497238     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bar M.,Neta M.,Linz H.Very first impressions.Emotion. 2006;6:269-278.
2. Baron J.Nonconsequentialist decisions.Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1994;17:1-10.
3. Baumard N.,André J.-B.,Sperber D.A mutualistic approach to morality.Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2013;36:59-122.
4. Ditto P. H.,Jemmott J. B.From rarity to evaluative extremity: Effects of prevalence information on evaluations of positive and negative characteristics.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;57:16-26.
5. Fiske S.,Cuddy A.,Glick P.Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2007;11:77-83.
6. Fiske S. T.Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980;38:889-906.
7. Gaertner S. L.,Dovidio J. F.The aversive form of racism.Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. 1986;:61-89.
8. Gintis H.,Bowles S.,Boyd R. T.,Fehr E.Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005:.
9. Greenwald A. G.Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use?.Psychological Bulletin. 1976;83:314-320.
10. Graham J.,Haidt J.,Nosek B. A.Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009;96:1029-1046.
11. Graham J.,Nosek B. A.,Haidt J.,Iyer R.,Koleva S.,Ditto P. H.Mapping the moral domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011;101:366-385.
12. Haidt J.The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological Review. 2001;108:814-834.
13. Haidt J.The new synthesis in moral psychology.Science. 2007;316:998-1002.
14. Haidt J.,Bjorklund F.,Murphy SMoral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. 2011:.
15. Haidt J.,Hersh M.Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2001;31:191-221.
16. Haidt J.,Koller S.,Dias M.Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993;65:613-628.
17. Hsee C. K.,Loewenstein G. F.,Blount S.,Bazerman M. H.Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluation of options: A review and theoretical analysis.Psychological Bulletin. 1999;125:576-590.
18. Jones E. E.,Davis K. E.Advances in experimental social psychology. Berkowitz L., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1965:219-266.
19. Kasof J.Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons.Psychological Bulletin. 1993;113:140-163.
20. Kelley H. H.Nebraska symposium on motivation. Levine D., ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 1967:192-238.
21. Miller G. F.Sexual selection for moral virtues.Quarterly Review of Biology. 2007;82:97-125.
22. Nelson J. D.Finding useful questions: On Bayesian diagnosticity, probability, impact, and information gain.Psychological Review. 2005;112:979-999.
23. Nelson J. D.,McKenzie C. R. M.,Cottrell G. W.,Sejnowski T. J.Experience matters: Information acquisition optimizes probability gain.Psychological Science. 2010;7:960-969.
24. Pizarro D. A.,Tannenbaum D.The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil. Shaver P.Mikulincer M., ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2011:91-108.
25. Pizarro D. A.,Tannenbaum D.,Uhlmann E. L.Mindless, harmless, and blameworthy.Psychological Inquiry. 2012;23:185-188.
26. Rozin P.,Lowery L.,Imada S.,Haidt J.The moral-emotion triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral ethics (community, autonomy, divinity).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;76:574-586.
27. Schnall S.,Benton J.,Harvey S.With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments.Psychological Science. 2008;19:1219-1222.
28. Snyder M. L.,Kleck R. E.,Strenta A.,Mentzer S. J.Avoidance of the handicapped: An attributional ambiguity analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979;37:2297-2306.
29. Tannenbaum D.,Uhlmann E. L.,Diermeier D.Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011;47:1249-1254.
30. Todorov A.,Said C. P.,Engell A. D.,Oosterhof N. N.Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2008;12:455-460.
31. Uhlmann E. L.,Zhu L.,Diermeier D.When actions speak volumes: The role of inferences about moral character in outrage over racial bigotry. 2013:.
32. Uhlmann E. L.,Zhu L.,Tannenbaum D.When it takes a bad person to do the right thing.Cognition. 2013;126:326-334.
33. Willis J.,Todorov A.First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face.Psychological Science. 2006;17:592-598.