Developing integrative research for sustainability science through a complexity principles-based approach

Sustainability Science

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 143-155

  van Kerkhoff, Lorrae ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Complex systems; Integration; Research design; Sustainability science methodology; Systems thinking; Transdisciplinarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897580103     PISSN: 18624065     EISSN: 18624057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-013-0203-y     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Agyeman J, Evans B (2004) 'Just sustainability': the emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain? Geogr J 170: 155-164.
2. Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B (eds) (2011) The SAGE handbook of complexity and management. Sage, London.
3. Allenby BR, Sarewitz DR (2011) The techno-human condition. MIT Press, Cambridge.
4. Anon (2012) Co-designing knowledge: A common understanding of integrated global change research. Online report http://www. nkgcf. org/files/pdf/4%20pages%20Integration%20WS%20%20%28web%29. pdf. Accessed 10 June 2012.
5. Bammer G (2005) Integration and implementation sciences: building a new specialization. Ecol Soc 20: 6.
6. Bardwell LV (1991) Problem-framing: A perspective on environmental problem-solving. Environ Manage 15: 603-612.
7. Blackstock KL, Carter CE (2007) Operationalising sustainability science for a sustainability directive? Reflecting on three pilot projects. Geogr J 173(4): 343-357.
8. Blackstock KL, Kelly GJ et al (2007) Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecol Econ 60(4): 726-742.
9. Brundiers K, Wiek A (2011) Educating students in real-world sustainability research-vision and implementation. Innov Higher Educ 36(2): 107-124.
10. Cartledge K, Dürrwächter C, Jimenez VH, Winder NP (2009) Making sure you solve the right problem. Ecol Soc 14: r3.
11. Cleland D, Dray A, Perez P, Cruz-Trinidad A, Geronimo R (2012) Simulating the dynamics of subsistence fishing communities: REEFGAME as a learning and data-gathering computer-assisted role-play game. Simul Gaming 43: 102-117.
12. Cooperrider DL, Whitney DK (2005) Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.
13. Evely AC, Fazey I, Lambin X, Lambert E, Allen S, Pinard M (2010) Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research. Environ Conserv 37: 442-450.
14. Hadorn GH, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E (eds) (2008) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, London.
15. Ison RL (2010) Systems practice: how to act in a climate change world. Springer/Open University, London.
16. Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79: 1-10.
17. Jerneck A, Olsson L et al (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6(1): 69-82.
18. Jones NA, Perez P, Measham TG, Kelly GJ, D'Aquino P, Daniell KA, Dray A, Ferrand N (2009) Evaluating participatory modeling: developing a framework for cross-case analysis. Environ Manage 44: 1180-1195.
19. Kasperson RE (2008) Coping with deep uncertainty: challenges for environmental assessment and decision-making uncertainty and risk. In: Bammer G, Smithson M (eds) Multidisciplinary perspectives. Earthscan, London, pp 356-367.
20. Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE (2005) The social contours of risk. Earthscan, London.
21. Keen M, Brown VA et al (2005) Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, London.
22. Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
23. Kueffer C (2006) Integrative ecological research: case-specific validation of ecological knowledge for environmental problem solving. GAIA 15: 115-120.
24. Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl 1): 25-43.
25. Leach M, Scoones I, Stirling A (2010) Dynamic sustainabilities: technology, environment, social justice. Earthscan, London.
26. Liu Y, Gupta H, Springer E, Wagener T (2008) Linking science with environmental decision making: experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management. Environ Model Softw 23: 846-858.
27. Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23(1): 161-183.
28. Mathews LG, Jones A (2008) Using systems thinking to improve interdisciplinary learning outcomes: reflections on a pilot study in land economics. Issues Integr Stud 26: 73-104.
29. McDonald D, Bammer G, Deane P (2009) Research integration using dialogue methods. ANU E-press, Canberra.
30. Merali Y, Allen P (2011) Complexity and systems thinking. In: Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B (eds) The SAGE handbook of complexity and management. SAGE, London, pp 31-52.
31. National Office of Atmospheric Administration (2004) ICM basics: What does 'integrated' mean? Online source: http://icm. noaa. gov/story/icm_inte. html [Accessed 12 June 2012].
32. National Research Council (1999) Our common journey: A transition toward sustainability. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
33. Plsek PE, Wilson T (2001) Complexity science: complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations. Br Med J 323: 746-749.
34. Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) (2008) The SAGE handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. SAGE, London.
35. Reed J (2007) Appreciative inquiry: research for change. SAGE, Thousand Oaks.
36. Robinson J (2008) Being undisciplined: transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond. Futures 40: 70-86.
37. Roux DJ, Stirzaker RJ, Breen CM, Lefroy EC, Cresswell HP (2010) Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs. Environ Sci Policy 13: 733-741.
38. Rowe D (2007) Education for a sustainable future. Science 317: 323-324.
39. Russell AW, Wickson F, Carew AL (2008) Transdisciplinarity: context, contradictions and capacity. Futures 40: 460-472.
40. Schoolman ED, Guest JS, Bush KF, Bell AR (2012) How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustain Sci 7: 67-80.
41. Shackley S, Wynne B, Waterton C (1996) Imagine complexity: the past, present and future potential of complex thinking. Futures 28: 201-225.
42. Sherren K, Fischer J, Clayton H, Schirmer J, Dovers S (2010) Integration by case, place and process: transdisciplinary research for sustainable grazing in the Lachlan River catchment, Australia. Landsc Ecol 25: 1219-1230.
43. Spangenberg JH (2011) Sustainability science: A review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv 38(3): 275-287.
44. Stark R, Mandl H (2007) Bridging the gap between basic and applied research by an integrative research approach. Educ Res Eval 13: 249-261.
45. Stauffacher M, Walter A, Lang D, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2006) Learning to research environmentalproblems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: the transdisciplinary case studyapproach. Int J Sustain Higher Education 7: 252-275.
46. Stock P, Burton RJF (2011) Defining terms for integrated (multi-inter-trans-disciplinary) sustainability research. Sustainability 3: 1090-1113.
47. Talwar S, Wiek A et al (2011) User engagement in sustainability research. Sci Public Policy 38(5): 379-390.
48. Tress B, Tress G, Fry G (2005) Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. Environ Manage 36: 792-807.
49. Ulrich W, Reynolds M (2010) Critical systems heuristics. In: Reynolds M, Holwell S (eds) Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide. Springer, London, pp 243-292.
50. van de Fliert E, Braun AR (2002) Conceptualizing integrative, farmer participatory research for sustainable agriculture: from opportunities to impact. Agric Hum Values 19: 25-38.
51. van Kerkhoff L (2005) Integrated research: concepts of connection in environmental science and policy. Environ Sci Policy 8: 452-463.
52. van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L (2006) Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31: 445-477.
53. Watkins JM, Mohr BJ (2001) Appreciative inquiry: change at the speed of imagination. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco.
54. Wickson F, Carew AL, Russell AW (2006) Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures 38: 1046-1059.
55. Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability-a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2): 203-218.
56. Wiek A, Farioli F, Fukushi K, Yarime M (2012a) Sustainability science: bridging the gap between science and society. Sustain Sci 7: 1-4.
57. Wiek A, Ness B et al (2012b) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: A comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl. 1): 5-24.
58. Wuelser G, Pohl C, Hadorn GH (2011) Structuring complexity for tailoring research contributions to sustainable development: A framework. Sustain Sci 7: 81-93.