Collaboration network and pattern analysis: Case study of dye-sensitized solar cells

Scientometrics

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1745-1762

  Wang, Xuefeng ^a   Li, Rongrong ^a   Ren, Shiming ^a   Zhu, Donghua ^a   Huang, Meng ^a   Qiu, Pengjun ^a  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Author activity index; Authorship collaboration; Bibliometrics; Collaboration network; Dye sensitized solar cells

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897572009     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1180-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Beaver, D. B., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65-84.
2. Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616.
3. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
4. Chen, C. (2013). CiteSpace: Visualizing Patterns and Trends in Scientific Literature. http://cluster. ischool. drexel. edu/~cchen/citespace/download. html, May 25, 2013.
5. Frame, J. D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and Caribbean. Interciencia, 2(2), 143-148.
6. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
7. Guo, Y., Ma, T., Porter, A. L., & Huang, L. (2012). Text mining of information resources to inform Forecasting Innovation Pathways. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(8), 843-861.
8. He, T. (2009). International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, 80(3), 571-582.
9. Huang, M. -H., Dong, H. -R., & Chen, D. -Z. (2013). The unbalanced performance and regional differences in scientific and technological collaboration in the field of solar cells. Scientometrics, 94(1), 423-438.
10. Hui, Z., Cai, X., G., J. -M, & Wang, Q. A. (2011). Structure and collaboration relationship analysis in a scientific collaboration network. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56(1), 3702-3706.
11. Ileperuma, O. A. (2013). Gel polymer electrolytes for dye sensitized solar cells: A review. Materials Technology: Advanced Performance Materials, 28(1-2), 65-70.
12. Jin, B., & Rousseau, R. (2005). China's quantitative expansion phase: Exponential growth but low impact. Informetrics, 1-2, 362-370.
13. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
14. Kostoff, R. N. (2011). Comparison of China/USA science and technology performance. Journal of Informetrics, 2008(2), 354-363.
15. Kostoff, R. N., Briggs, M., Rushenberg, R., Bowles, C. A., Icenhour, A. S., Nikodym, K. F., et al. (2007). Chinese science and technology? Structure and infrastructure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(9), 1539-1573.
16. Kostoff, R. N., Rigsby, J. T., & Barth, R. B. (2006). Brief communication adjacency and proximity searching in the Science Citation Index and Google. The Journal of Information Science, 32(6), 581-587.
17. Kun L. and Dietmar W. (2012). Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word-based, topic-based, and author cocitation approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1973-1986.
18. Liu, X., Zhang, P., Li, X., Chen, H., Dang, Y., Larson, C., et al. (2009). Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(8), 1845-1866.
19. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17(1), 101-126.
20. Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40.
21. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 1-8.
22. Robin, S., & Schubert, T. (2013). Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany. Research Policy, 42(1), 149-166.
23. Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5/6), 281-291.
24. Tang, Li, & Shapira, P. (2011). US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: Patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 1-16.
25. Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), 13-14.
26. Wang, G., & Guan, J. (2011). Measuring science-technology interactions using patent citations and author-inventor links: An exploration analysis from Chinese nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13(12), 6245-6262.
27. Wang, X., Shenmeng, X., Liu, D., & Liang, Y. (2012). The role of Chinese-American scientists in China-US scientific collaboration: a study in nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 91, 737-749.
28. Zhang, F., Jiang, P., Zhu, Q., & Cao, W. (2012). Modeling and analyzing of an enterprise collaboration network supported by service-oriented manufacturing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B-Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 226(B9), 1579-1593.
29. Zhao, D. (2006). Towards all-author co-citation analysis. Information Processing and Management, 42(6), 1578-1591.
30. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Comparing all-author and first-author co-citation analyses of information science. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 229-239.
31. Zuckerman Harriet A. (1968). Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology, 74(3), 276.