The implementation and assessment of a shared 21st century learning vision: A district-based approach

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 201-228

  Gunn, Thelma M ^a   Hollingsworth, Maurice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

Author keywords

District based approach; Information technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897563215     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2013.10782603     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barnes, R. (2005). Moving towards technology education: Factors that facilitated teachers' implementation of a technology curriculum. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 6-18.
2. nd edition) (pp. 695-713). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
4. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Kapitzke, C. (2006). Internet chatrooms: E-space for youth of the risk society. In L. T. W. Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy in technology at the K-12 level (pp. 158-175). London: Idea Group Reference.
7. Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
8. Miles, M. (1983). Unraveling the mystery of institutionalization. Educational Leadership, 41(3), 14-19.
9. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series.
10. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part II: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon (NCB University Press), 9(6), 1-9.
11. Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12. Scardamalia, M. (2001). Big change questions: "Will educational institutions, within their present structures, be able to adapt sufficiently to meet the needs of the information age?" Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 171-176.
13. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Slavin, R. (2005). Evidence-based reform: Advancing the education of students at risk. Report prepared for Renewing Our Schools, Supporting Our Future: A National Task-Force on Public Education. Retrieved May 2008 from http://www.americanprogress.org/kf/slavin%20 3962017%20final.pdf
15. Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625-649.
16. st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17. Waks, L. J. (2006). Globalization, at-risk students, and the reconceptualization of technological literacy. In L. T. W. Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy in technology at the K-12 level (pp. 55-72). London: Idea Group Reference.
18. st century skills. Harvard Education Letter, 24(5), 1-3.
19. Wenglinsky, H. (2006). Technology and achievement: The bottom line. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 29-32.
20. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge-building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research Development, 55, 117-145.