Optimization of membrane separation processes for protein fractionation

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 53, Issue 13, 2014, Pages 5103-5109

  Bhadouria, Arjun Singh ^a,b   Sorci, Mirco ^a,b   Gu, Minghao ^a,b   Belfort, Georges ^a,b   Hahn, Juergen ^a,b  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OPTIMIZATION; PROTEINS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMINS; MEMBRANE ULTRAFILTRATION; MULTIDIMENSIONAL OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS; OPTIMIZATION OF MEMBRANES; POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION MODELS; PROTEIN FRACTIONATION;

FRACTIONATION;

EID: 84897559760     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie401303d     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Shukla, A. A.; Hubbard, B.; Tressel, T.; Guhan, S.; Low, D. Downstream processing of monoclonal antibodies-Application of platform approaches J. Chromatogr., B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007, 848 (1) 28-39
2. Cherkasov, A. N.; Polotsky, A. E. The resolving power of ultrafiltration J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 110, 79-82
3. Porter, M. C. Concentration polarization with membrane ultrafiltration Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 1972, 11 (3) 234-248
4. Mahsa, M. R.; Zydney, A. L. Role of electrostatic interactions during protein ultrafiltration Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 160, 40-48
5. van Eijndhoven, R. H. C. M.; Saksena, S.; Zydney, A. L. Protein fractionation using electrostatic interactions in membrane filtration Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1995, 48, 406-414
6. Saksena, S.; Zydney, A. L. Effect of solution pH and ionic strength on the separation of albumin from immunoglobins (IgG) by selective filtration Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1994, 43, 960-968
7. Bowen, W. R.; Jenner, F. Dynamic ultrafiltration model for charged colloidal dispersions: A Wigner-Seitz cell approach Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50, 1707-1736
8. Bacchin, P.; Aimar, P.; Sanchez, V. Model for colloidal fouling of membranes AIChE J. 1995, 41, 368-376
9. Bowen, W. R.; Williams, P. M. Dynamic ultrafiltration model for proteins: A colloidal interaction approach Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1996, 50, 125-135
10. Bowen, W. R.; Jones, M. G.; Yousef, H. N. S. Dynamic ultrafiltration of proteins-A neural network approach J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 146, 225-235
11. Box, G. E. P.; Wilson, K. B. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions J. R. Stat. Soc. 1951, 13 (1) 1-45
12. Lin, S. H.; Hung, C. L.; Juang, R. S. Effect of operating parameters on the separation of proteins in aqueous solutions by dead-end ultrafiltration Desalination 2008, 234, 116-125
13. Yates, F. Design and analysis of factorial experiments, Technical Communication no. 35 of the Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, London, 1937.
14. Plackett, R. L.; Burman, J. P. The design of optimum multifactorial experiments Biometrika 1946, 33, 305-325
15. Picard, R.; Cook, D. Cross-validation of regression models Journal of the American Statistical Association 1984, 79, 575-583
16. Shao, J. Linear model selection by cross-validation J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1993, 88, 486-494
17. Efron, B. Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: Improvement on cross-validation J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1983, 78, 316-331
18. Efron, B. How biased is the apparent error rate of a prediction rule? J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1986, 81, 461-470
19. p Technometrics 1973, 15, 661-675
20. Akaike, H. A new look at statistical model identification IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19, 716-723
21. Mosier, C. I. Symposium: The need and means of cross-validation. I. Problems and designs of cross-validation Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1951, 11, 5-11
22. Browne, M. W. Cross-validation methods J. Math. Psychol. 2000, 44, 108-132
23. Sorci, M.; Gu, M.; Heldt, C. L.; Grafeld, E.; Belfort, G. A multi-dimensional approach for fractionating proteins using charged membranes Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013, 110, 1704-1713