Effect of operating parameters on the separation of proteins in aqueous solutions by dead-end ultrafiltration

Desalination

Volumn 234, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 116-125

  Lin, Su Hsia ^a,b   Hung, Chia Lin ^a,b   Juang, Ruey Shin ^a,b  

^a NANYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b YUAN ZE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Dead end ultrafiltration; Flux decline; Operating parameters; Proteins; Separation

Indexed keywords

BODY FLUIDS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); CONDUCTIVE PLASTICS; FLOW INTERACTIONS; IONIC STRENGTH; ISOMERS; LOCAL AREA NETWORKS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROTEINS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEPARATION; SOLUTIONS; THERMOMECHANICAL PULPING PROCESS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMINS; DEAD-END ULTRAFILTRATION; EXPERIMENTAL DATUM; FLUX DECLINE; LOW PRESSURES; OPERATING PARAMETERS; ORDER POLYNOMIALS; PAN MEMBRANES; POLYETHERSULFONE; PROCESS VARIABLES; PROTEIN CONCENTRATIONS; PROTEIN REJECTIONS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGIES; SOLUTION PHS; STIRRING SPEEDS; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

PH;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; HEMOGLOBIN; MEMBRANE; POLYMER; PROTEIN; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEPARATION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

BOVINAE;

EID: 55049083212     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.09.077     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. R.K. Scopes, Protein Purification: Principles and Practice, 3rd edn., Springer, New York, 1994.
2. Sarfert F.T., and Etzel M.R. Mass transfer limitations in protein separations using ionexchange membranes. J. Chromatogr. A 764 (1997) 3-20
3. Saksena S., and Zydney A.L. Effect of solution pH and ionic strength on the separation of albumin from immunoglobulins (IgG) by selective ultrafiltration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 43 (1994) 960-968
4. van Eijndhoven R.H.C.M., Saksena S., and Zydney A.L. Protein fractionation using electrostatic interactions in membrane filtration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 48 (1995) 406-414
5. Feins M., and Sirkar K.K. Novel internally staged ultrafiltration for protein purification. J. Membr. Sci. 248 (2005) 137-148
6. Metsamuuronen S., and Nystrom M. Critical flux in cross-flow ultrafiltration of protein solutions. Desalination 175 (2005) 37-47
7. Powell M.J., and Timperman A.T. Quantitative analysis of protein recovery from dilute, large volume samples by tangential flow ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 252 (2005) 227-236
8. Ghosh R. Novel cascade ultrafiltration configuration for continuous, high-resolution protein-protein fractionation: a simulation study. J. Membr. Sci. 226 (2003) 85-99
9. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., and Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 100 (1995) 259-272
10. Howell J.A. Sub-critical flux operation of microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 107 (1995) 165-171
11. F. Yates, The Design and Analysis of Factorial Experiments, Imperial Bureau of Soil Science, Harpenden, 1937.
12. Annadurai G., Juang R.S., and Lee D.J. Factorial design analysis for adsorption of dye on activated carbon beads incorporated with calcium alginate. Adv. Environ. Res. 6 (2002) 191-198
13. Teng M.Y., Lin S.H., Wu C.Y., and Juang R.S. Factors affecting selective rejection of proteins within a binary mixture during cross-flow ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 281 (2006) 103-110
14. Huisman I.H., Pradanos P., and Hernandez A. The effect of protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions on membrane fouling in ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 179 (2000) 79-90
15. Watanabe K., Matsuda T., and Nakamura R. Shear-induced aggregation and denaturation of egg-white proteins in acid media. J. Food Sci. 50 (1985) 507-510
16. Pincet F., Perez E., and Belfort G. Molecular interaction between proteins and synthetic membrane polymer films. Langmiur 11 (1995) 1229-1235
17. Causserand C., Kara Y., and Aimar P. Protein fractionation using selective adsorption on clay surface before filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 186 (2001) 165-181
18. Musale D.A., and Kulkarni S.S. Relative rates of protein transmission through poly(acrylonitrile) based ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 136 (1997) 13-23