Encounters on a shape-changing bench: Exploring atmospheres and social behaviour in situ

TEI 2014 - 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 233-240

  Kinch, Sofie ^a   Grönvall, Erik ^b   Petersen, Marianne Graves ^c   Rasmussen, Majken Kirkegaard ^c  

^a ALEXANDRA INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

^b IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Atmospheres; Bench; CoMotion; In the wild; Interactive furniture; Shape changing interface; Social encounters

Indexed keywords

BENCH; COMOTION; CONCERT HALL; INTERACTIVE FURNITURE; PHYSICAL CHANGES; SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR; SOCIAL ENCOUNTERS; USERS' EXPERIENCES;

EXTRATERRESTRIAL ATMOSPHERES;

EID: 84897551971     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2540930.2540947     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Burneleit, E., Hemmert, F., and Wettach, R. Living interfaces: the impatient toaster. TEI'09, ACM (2009), 21-22.
2. Coelho, M. and Maes, P. Shutters: A Permeable Surface for Environmental Control and Communication. TEI (2009), 13.
3. Dalsgaard, P. and Kortbek, K.J. Staging Urban Atmospheres in Interaction Design. Nordes (2009).
4. Davis, F., Roseway, A., Carroll, E., and Czerwinski, M. Actuating mood: design of the textile mirror. TEI, (2013), 99-106.
5. Dekel, A., Simon, Y., Dar, H., Tarazi, E., Rabinowitz, O., and Sterman, Y. Adding Playful Interaction to Public Spaces. In M. Maybury, O. Stock and W. Wahlster, eds., Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, 225-229.
6. Djajadiningrat, T., Matthews, B., and Stienstra, M. Easy doesn't do it: skill and expression in tangible aesthetics. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 8 (2007), 657-676.
7. Dourish, P. Where the Action is. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2004.
8. Fujimura, N. Remote furniture: interactive art installation for public space. ACM (2004), 23.
9. Harrison, C. and Hudson, S.E. Providing dynamically changeable physical buttons on a visual display. CHI, (2009), 299-270.
10. Hebing, R. Bench. 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.robhebing.nl/?p=19.
11. Hemmert, F., Hamann, S., Löwe, M., Wohlauf, A., Zeipelt, J., and Joost, G. Take me by the hand: haptic compasses in mobile devices through shape change and weight shift. NordiCHI, (2010), 671.
12. Hemmert, F., Löwe, M., Wohlauf, A., and Joost, G. Animate mobiles: proxemically reactive posture actuation as a means of relational interaction with mobile phones. TEI (2013), 267-270.
13. Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. ACM (2006), 437-446.
14. Jacob, R.J.K., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L.M., et al. Reality-based interaction: a framework for post-WIMP interfaces. CHI (2008).
15. Kahn, N. and UAP. Brisbane airport kinetic parking garage facade, Retrieved from: http://www.designboom.com/weblog/cat/10/view/23329/brisbane- airport-kinetic-parking-garage-facade-byned-kahn-uap.html.
16. Katsumoto, Y., Tokuhisa, S., and Inakage, M. Ninja track: design of electronic toy variable in shape and flexibility. TEI (2013), 17-24.
17. Kinch, S. Articulating Atmospheres through middle ground experiences in interaction design. The Swedish School of Textiles (2011), 214-222.
18. Leibman, M. The Effects of Sex and Race Norms On Personal Space. Environment and Behavior 2, 2 (1970), 208-246.
19. Mazur, A. Interpersonal Spacing on Public Benches in "Contact" Vs. "Noncontact" Cultures. The Journal of Social Psychology 101, 1 (1977), 53-58.
20. Muller, C.R. and Rieman, T.D. The Shaker chair. University of Massachusetts Press, 1984.
21. Oosterhuis, K. and Biloria, N. Interactions with proactive architectural spaces. Communications of the ACM 51, 6 (2008), 70.
22. Pallasmaa, J. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Academy Group Ltd, United Kingdom, (1996).
23. Pallasmaa, J. On Atmosphere: peripheral perception and existential experience. In P. Mac Keith, ed., Encounters 2. Rakennustieto, Helsinki, 2012, 237-251.
24. Parkes, A. and Ishii, H. Bosu: A Physical Programmable Design Tool for Transformability with Soft Mechanics. DIS (2010), 189-198.
25. Parkes, A.J. Phrases of the kinetic: dynamic physicality as a dimension of the design process. 2009. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/51661.
26. Petersen, M.G., Iversen, O.S., Krogh, P.G., and Ludvigsen, M. Aesthetic interaction: a pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems. ACM (2004), 269-276.
27. Petersen, M.G. Squeeze: designing for playful experiences among co-located people in homes. ACM (2007), 2609-2614.
28. Rasmussen, M.K., Pedersen, E.W., Petersen, M.G., and Hornb'k, K. Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions. CHI '12, ACM (2012), 735-744.
29. Sacks, H. Lectures on Conversation: Volumes I & II. Blackwell, 1995.
30. Thibaud, J.-P. The sensory Fabric of Urban Atmospheres. Senses & Society 6, 2 (2011), 203-215.
31. Togler, J., Hemmert, F., and Wettach, R. Living interfaces: The Thrifty Faucet. TEI (2009), 43-44.
32. Ullmer, B. and Ishii, H. Emerging Frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Systems Journal 39, 3 & 4 (2000), 915-931.