Drivers of change in socio-ecological production landscapes: Implications for better management

Ecology and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Gu, Hongyan ^a,b   Subramanian, Suneetha M ^b  

^a SHANGHAI ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Case study; Conservation; Cultural landscapes; Drivers of change; Ecosystem approach; Resilience

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; FUTURE PROSPECT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY MAKING; PROTECTED AREA; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ASIA;

EID: 84897511531     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-06283-190141     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adhikari, S. 2011. Community forestry in Nepal. Pages 23-31 in IPSI Secretariat, editor. IPSI case study booklet. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Yokohama, Japan.
2. Argumedo, A., and B. Y. L. Wong. 2010. The ayllu system of the Potato Park (Peru). Pages 84-90 in C. Bélair, K. Ichikawa, B. Y. L. Wong, and K. J. Mulongoy, editors. Sustainable use of biological diversity in socio-ecological production landscapes. Background to the 'Satoyama Initiative for the benefit of biodiversity and human well-being.' Technical Series No. 52, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.cbd.int/doc/ publications/cbd-ts-52-en.pdf
3. Bergamini, N., R. Blasiak, P. Eyzaguirre, K. Ichikawa, D. Mijatovic, F. Nakao, and S. M. Subramanian. 2013. Indicators of resilience in socio-ecological production landscapes (SEPLs). United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS) Policy Report, UNU-IAS, Yokohama, Japan. [online] URL: http://www.ias.unu.edu/resource_centre/ Indicators-of-resilience-in-sepls_ev.pdf
4. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2003. Navigating socialecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511541957
5. Brown, J., N. Mitchell, and M. Beresford. 2005. The protected landscape approach: linking nature, culture and community. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. Calvo-Iglesias, M. S., G. Méndez-Martínez, and R. A.
6. Díaz-Varela. 2011. The Agras field system as a cultural landscape in Galicia (Spain). Pages 229-236 in IPSI Secretariat, editor. IPSI case study booklet. UUnited Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Yokohama, Japan.
7. Charnya, C., S. Pithou, S. Sovannarith, J. McAndrew, N. Sokunthea, P. Dorina, and R. Bidduplh. 2001. Learning from rural development programmes in Cambodia. Pages 285-346 in A. Straub, editor. Institutions, livelihoods and the environment: change and response in mainland Southeast Asia. Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, Copenhagen, Denmark.
8. Colfer, C. J. P., and D. Capistrano. 2005. The politics of decentralization: forests, people and power. Earthscan, London, UK.
9. Costello, L., and B. Vorsak. 2011. Natural resource management in the critical habitat of Western Siem Pang. Pages 69-77 in IPSI Secretariat, editor. IPSI case study booklet. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Yokohama, Japan.
10. Curtis, G. 1998. Cambodia reborn? The transition to democracy and development. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.
11. Daguitan, F. 2012. Role of traditional knowledge in strengthening socio-ecological production landscapes. Pages 176-182 in IPSI Secretariat, editor. IPSI case study booklet. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Yokohama, Japan.
12. Davis, M. 2005. Forests and conflict in Cambodia. International Forestry Review 7:161-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1505/ifor.2005.7.2.161
13. Diego Quintana, R., L. Concheiro Bórquez, and R. Pérez Aviles. 1998. Peasant logic, agrarian policy, land mobility, and land markets in Mexico. Working Paper 21, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
14. Duraiappah, A. K., K. Nakamura, K. Takeuchi, M. Watanabe, and M. Nishi. 2012. Satoyama-satoumi ecosystems and human well-being: socio-ecological production landscapes of Japan. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, Japan.
15. Fisher, R. J. 2010. Devolution or persistence of state control? Pages 21-37 in C. Wittayapak and P. Vandergeest, editors. The politics of decentralization: natural resource management in Asia. Mekong, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
16. Folke, C. 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16:253-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
17. Fratkin, E. 1997. Pastoralism: governance and development issues. Annual Review of Anthropology 26:235-261. http://dx.doi. org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.235
18. Gonzalez, C. G. 2003. Seasons of resistance: sustainable agriculture and food security in Cuba. Tulane Environmental Law Journal 16:685-732.
19. Harvey, C. A., O. Komar, R. Chazdon, B. G. Ferguson, B. Finegan, D. M. Griffith, M. Martínez-Ramos, H. Morales, R. Nigh, L. Soto-Pinto, M. Van Breugel, and M. Wishnie. 2008. Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conservation Biology 22:8-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00863.x
20. Iftekhar, M. S. 2006. Conservation and management of the Bangladesh coastal ecosystem: overview of an integrated approach. Natural Resources Forum 30:230-237. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2006.00111.x
21. Ivison, D., P. Patton, and W. Sanders. 2000. Political theory and the rights of indigenous peoples. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
22. Jodha, N., and A. Bhatia. 1998. Community management of commons: re-empowerment process and the gaps. Crossing Boundaries: 7th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bloomington, Indiana, USA. [online] URL: http:// www.snap-undp.org/lepknowledgebank/Public%20Document%20Library/ Community%20Management%20of%20Commons%20-%20Reempowerment% 20process%20and%20the%20gaps.pdf
23. Kenya Wetlands Biodiversity Research Team (KENWEB). 2011. Promoting co-management of socio-ecological landscapes in flood dependent agroforestry, pastoral and fishery systems of eastwards flowing rivers of Eastern Africa through scientific research and indigenous knowledge. KENWEB, Nairobi, Kenya. [online] URL: http://satoyama-initiative.org/promoting-co-management-of-socioecological-landscapes-in-flood-dependent-agroforestry-pastoraland-fishery-systems-of-eastwards-flowing-rivers-of-eastern-africathrough-scientific-research-and-indig/
24. Khumsri, M., N. Sriputtnibondh, and W. Thongpun. 2005. Fisheries co-management in Lower Songkhram River Basin: problems and challenges. Pages 121-126 in Proceedings of the 7th Technical Symposium on Mekong Fisheries (Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand, 15-17 November 2005). Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic. [online] URL: http://ns1.mrcmekong.org/download/free_download/ proceedings_7TechSym/paper9-fisheries-co-management.pdf
25. Li, W. J., S. H. Ali, and Q. Zhang. 2007. Property rights and grassland degradation: a study of the Xilingol pasture, Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Environmental Management 85:461-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.010
26. Liu, J., J. Harris, L. Zhao, H. Jiang, and F. Qian. 2012. Integrating community development with the management of grasslands at Ke'erqin Nature Reserve, Inner Mongolia, China. Pages 183-196 in IPSI Secretariat, editor. IPSI case study booklet. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Yokohama, Japan.
27. Marady, I., H. Sokla, and S. Mary. 2012. Role and involvement of the commune council in community forestry activities in Domnak Neak Ta Thmor Puan. Pages 9-15 in IPSI Secretariat, editor. IPSI case study booklet. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Yokohama, Japan.
28. Mathur, P. K., and P. R. Sinha. 2008. Looking beyond protected area networks: a paradigm shift in approach for biodiversity conservation. International Forestry Review 10:305-314. http://dx. doi.org/10.1505/ifor.10.2.305
29. Matsuzaki, K., and B. Y. L. Wong. 2010. Forest management through community-based forest enterprises in Ixtlán de Juárez, Oaxaca, Mexico. Pages 98-100 in C. Bélair, K. Ichikawa, B. Y. L. Wong, and K. J. Mulongoy, editors. Sustainable use of biological diversity in socio-ecological production landscapes. Background to the 'Satoyama Initiative for the benefit of biodiversity and human well-being.' Technical Series No. 52, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-52-en.pdf
30. May, C. 2008. PGS guidelines: how participatory guarantee systems can develop and function. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://www.ifoam.org/about_ifoam/pdfs/PGS_PDFs/ PGS_Guidelines_EN_Web.pdf
31. McKay, D. 2006. Rethinking indigenous place: Igorot identity and locality in the Philippines. Australian Journal of Anthropology 17(3):291-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-9310.2006.tb00065. x
32. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Thailand. 2011. Local livelihood in the Lower Songkhram Basin. Pages 32-37 in IPSI Secretariat, editor. IPSI case study booklet. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Yokohama, Japan.
33. Mora, C., and P. F. Sale. 2011. Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 434:251-266. http://dx. doi.org/10.3354/meps09214
34. Morimoto, Y., P. Maundu, D. Tumbo, and P. Eyzaguirre. 2010. How farmers in Kitui use wild and agricultural ecosystems to meet their nutritional needs (Kenya). Pages 67-72 in C. Bélair, K. Ichikawa, B. Y. L. Wong, and K. J. Mulongoy, editors. Sustainable use of biological diversity in socio-ecological production landscapes. Background to the 'Satoyama Initiative for the benefit of biodiversity and human well-being.' Technical Series No. 52, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.cbd.int/doc/ publications/cbd-ts-52-en.pdf
35. Mugica-Valdés, L., M. Acosta-Cruz, and V. Anadón-Irizarry. 2011. Waterbird conservation promotes important energy flow between rice paddies and nearby Important Bird Areas in Cuba. Pages 78-83 in IPSI Secretariat, editor. IPSI case study booklet. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Yokohama, Japan.
36. Mukherjee, A., and C. K. Borad. 2004. Integrated approach towards conservation of Gir National Park: the last refuge of Asiatic Lions, India. Biodiversity & Conservation 13:2165-2182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000040009.75090.8c
37. Nakayama, S. 2010. Small scale catchment management in Malawi. [online] URL: http://satoyama-initiative.org/smallscale-catchment-management-in-malawi/
38. Nesbitt, H. J. 1997. Rice production in Cambodia. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, the Philippines. [online] URL: http://dspace.irri.org:8080/dspace/bitstream/10269/251/2/9712201007_ content.pdf
39. Nomi, A. 2011. Peru passes historic law on prior consultation. Earthrights International, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.earthrights.org/blog/peru-passes-historic-lawprior-consultation
40. Ohsako, Y. 2010. Reintroduction project of the Oriental White Stork for coexistence with humans in Satoyama areas, Hyogo, Japan. Pages 53-61 in IPSI Secretariat, editor. IPSI case study booklet. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Yokohama, Japan.
41. Ortiz, O. 2006. Evolution of agricultural extension and information dissemination in Peru: an historical perspective focusing on potato-related pest control. Agriculture and Human Values 23(4):477-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9014-4
42. Owuor, B., W. Mauta, and S. Eriksen. 2011. Sustainable adaptation and human security: interactions between pastoral and agropastoral groups in dryland Kenya. Climate and Development 3(1):42-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3763/cdev.2010.0063
43. Phillips, A. 1998. The nature of cultural landscapes-a nature conservation perspective. Landscape Research 23(1):21-38. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426399808706523
44. Pushpakumara, D. K. N. G., A. Wijiesekara, and D. G. Hunter. 2010. Kandyan homegardens: a promising land management system in Sri Lanka. Pages 102-108 in C. Bélair, K. Ichikawa, B. Y. L. Wong, and K. J. Mulongoy, editors. Sustainable use of biological diversity in socio-ecological production landscapes. Background to the 'Satoyama Initiative for the benefit of biodiversity and human well-being.' Technical Series No. 52, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.cbd.int/doc/ publications/cbd-ts-52-en.pdf
45. Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
46. Sieder, R. 2002. Multiculturalism in Latin America: indigenous rights, diversity and democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, New York, USA.
47. Sirilal, R., and C. B. Hull. 2011. Sri Lanka says rice losses at 35 percent. Thomson Reuters Foundation, London, UK. [online] URL: http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/sri-lanka-says-rice-lossesat-35-percent
48. Steins, N. A., and V. M. Edwards. 1999. Platforms for collective action in multiple-use common-pool resources. Agriculture and Human Values 16:309-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007587330755
49. Sunam, R. K., M. R. Banjade, N. S. Paudel, and D. B. Khatri. 2010. Can bureaucratic control improve community forestry governance? An analysis of proposed Forest Act amendment. Discussion Paper Series 10:2, ForestAction Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal. [online] URL: http://www.forestaction.org/app/webroot/ js/tinymce/editor/plugins/filemanager/files/5.%20Sunam%20et%20al% 20Can%20bureaucratic%20control%20improve%20CF%20governance% 202010.pdf
50. Sunderlin, W. D. 2006. Poverty alleviation through community forestry in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam: an assessment of the potential. Forest Policy and Economics 8:386-396. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.08.008
51. ten Brink, P., editor. 2011. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in national and international policy making. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, Geneva, Switzerland. [online] URL: http://www.teebweb.org/our-publications/teebstudy-reports/national-and-international-policy-making/
52. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2011. Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya. [online] URL: http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/greeneconomyreport/tabid/29846/ default.aspx
53. van Oudenhoven, F. J. W., D. Mijatovic, and P. B. Eyzaguirre. 2011. Social-ecological indicators of resilience in agrarian and natural landscapes. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 22:154-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777831111113356
54. Vos, W., and H. Meekes. 1999. Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning 46(1-3):3-14. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2
55. Walker, B. H., J. M. Anderies, A. P. Kinzig, and P. Ryan. 2006. Exploring resilience in social-ecological systems through comparative studies and theory development: introduction to the special issue. Ecology and Society 11(1): 12. [online] URL: http:// www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art12/
56. Whitehead, M., R. Jones, and M. Jones. 2007. The nature of the state: excavating the political ecologies of the modern state. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
57. Wijisekara, A., and D. G. Hunter. 2010. The owita agroecosystem. Pages 113-115 in C. Bélair, K. Ichikawa, B. Y. L. Wong, and K. J. Mulongoy, editors. Sustainable use of biological diversity in socioecological production landscapes. Background to the 'Satoyama Initiative for the benefit of biodiversity and human well-being.' Technical Series No. 52, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-52-en.pdf
58. Wu, Z., and W. Du. 2008. Pastoral nomad rights in Inner Mongolia. Nomadic Peoples 12:13-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/ np.2008.120202
59. Xanthaki, A. 2007. Indigenous rights and United Nations standards: self-determination, culture and land. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511494468