Classification of women with and without hip fracture based on quantitative computed tomography and finite element analysis

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 619-626

  Nishiyama, K K ^a,f   Ito, M ^b,c   Harada, A ^d   Boyd, S K ^e,f  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

^b NAGASAKI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c NAGASAKI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^d NATIONAL CENTER FOR GERIATRICS AND GERONTOLOGY   (Japan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bone strength; Finite element analysis; Fracture; Machine learning; Proximal femur; QCT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; BONE LENGTH; BONE STRENGTH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FEMUR TROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; VOLUMETRY; AGED; CASE CONTROL STUDY; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; VERY ELDERLY; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE DENSITY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84897510258     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2459-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Amin S, Kopperdhal DL, Melton LJ, Achenbach SJ, Therneau TM, Riggs BL, Keaveny TM, Khosla S (2011) Association of hip strength estimates by finite element analysis with fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res 26:1593-1600
2. BesshoM, Ohnishi I,Matsuyama J,Matsumoto T, ImaiK,Nakamura K (2007) Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. J Biomech 40:1745-1753 (Pubitemid 46702134)
3. Bessho M, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, Ohashi S, Matsuyama J, Tobita K, Kaneko M, Nakamura K (2009) Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions. Bone 45:226-231
4. Cody DD, Gross GJ, Hou FJ, Spencer HJ, Goldstein SA, Fyhrie DP (1999) Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. J Biomech 32:1013-1020 (Pubitemid 29356040)
5. Dragomir-Daescu D, Op Den Buijs J, McEligot S, Dai Y, Entwistle RC, Salas C, Melton LJ, Bennet KE, Khosla S, Amin S (2011) Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip. Ann Biomed Eng 39:742-755
6. Duchemin L, Mitton D, Jolivet E, Bousson V, Laredo JD, Skalli W (2008) An anatomical subject-specific FE-model for hip fracture load prediction. Comput Method Biomech 11:105-111
7. Grassi L, Schileo E, Taddei F, Zani L, Juszczyk M, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M (2012) Accuracy of finite element predictions in sideways load configurations for the proximal human femur. J Biomech 45:394-399
8. Keaveny TM, Kopperdahl DL, Melton LJ, Hoffmann PF, Amin S, Riggs BL, Khosla S (2010) Age-dependence of femoral strength in white women and men. J Bone Miner Res 25:994-1001
9. Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Skinner HB (1998) Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J Biomech 31:125-133 (Pubitemid 28195808)
10. Keyak JH (2001) Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. Med Eng Phys 23:165-173
11. Keyak JH, Sigurdsson S,Karlsdottir G, Oskarsdottir D, Sigmarsdottir A, Zhao S, Kornak J, Harris TB, Sigurdsson G, Jonsson BY, Siggeirsdottir K, Eiriksdottir G, Gudnason V, Lang TF (2011) Male-female differences in the association between incident hip fracture and proximal femoral strength: a finite element analysis study. Bone 48:1239-1245
12. Koivumäki JE, Thevenot J, Pulkkinen P, Kuhn V, Link TM, Eckstein F, Jämsä T (2012) Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur. Bone 50:824-829
13. Orwoll ES, Marshall LM, Nielson CM, Cummings SR, Lapidus J, Cauley JA, Ensrud K, Lane N, Hoffmann PR, Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM (2009) Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men. J Bone Miner Res 24:475-483
14. Viceconti M, Davinelli M, Taddei F, Cappello A (2004) Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. J Biomech 37:1597-1605 (Pubitemid 39141853)
15. Wakao N, Harada A, Matsui Y, Takemura M, Shimokata H, Mizuno M, Ito M, Matsuyama Y, Ishiguro N (2009) The effect of impact direction on the fracture load of osteoporotic proximal femurs. Med Eng Phys 31:1134-1139
16. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761-1767
17. Melton LJ III (2003) Adverse outcomes of osteoporotic fractures in the general population. J Bone Miner Res 18:1139-1141
18. Nishiyama KK, Gilchrist S, Guy P, Cripton P, Boyd SK (2013) Proximal femur bone strength estimated by a computationally fast finite element analysis in a sideways fall configuration. J Biomech 46:1231-1236
19. Lang TF, Sigurdsson S, Karlsdottir G, Oskarsdottir D, Sigmarsdottir A, Chengshi J, Kornak J, Harris TB, Sigurdsson G, Jonsson BY, Siggeirsdottir K, Eiriksdottir G, Gudnason V, Keyak JH (2012) Age-related loss of proximal femoral strength in elderly men and women: the Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility Study-Reykjavik. Bone 50:743-748
20. Keaveny TM, McClung MR, Wan X, Kopperdahl DL, Mitlak BH, Krohn K (2012) Femoral strength in osteoporotic women treated with teriparatide or alendronate. Bone 50:165-170
21. Grisso JA, Kelsey JL, Strom BL, Ghiu GY, Maislin G, O'Brien LA, Hoffman S, Kaplan F (1991) Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. N Engl J Med 324:1326-1331
22. Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Kidd S, Black D (1989) Risk factors for nonsyncopal falls - a prospective study. JAMA 261:2663-2668 (Pubitemid 19127961)
23. Vapnik V (1982) Estimation of dependences based on empirical data: Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York
24. Valyon J,Horváth G (2003) A weighted generalized LS-SVM. Period Polytech Electr Eng 47:229-251
25. Kavitha MS, Asano A, Taguchi A, Kurita T, Sanada M (2012) Diagnosis of osteoporosis from dental panoramic radiographs using the support vector machine method in a computer-aided system. BMC Med Imaging 12:1
26. Lee S, Lee JW, Jeong JW, Yoo DS, Kim S (2008) A preliminary study on discrimination of osteoporotic fractured group from nonfractured group using support vector machine. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:474-477
27. Nishiyama K, Macdonald M, Hanley A, Boyd K (2013) Women with previous fragility fractures can be classified based on bone microarchitecture and finite element analysis measured with HR-pQCT. Osteoporos Int 24:1733-1740
28. Ito M, Wakao N, Hida T, Matsui Y, Abe Y, Aoyagi K, Uetani M, Harada A (2010) Analysis of hip geometry by clinical CT for the assessment of hip fracture risk in elderly Japanese women. Bone 46:453-457
29. Treece GM, GeeAH, Mayhew PM, Poole KE (2010) High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data. Med Image Anal 14:276-290
30. McErlain DD, Nishiyama KK, Sandino C, Boyd SK (2012) Evaluation of the effect of CT image resolution on voxel-based, subject specific FEA models. J Biomech 45(S1):S545
31. Keller TS (1994) Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. J Biomech 27:1159-1168
32. Varghese B, Short D, Penmetsa R, Goswami T, Hangartner T (2011) Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion. J Biomech 44:1374-1379
33. Pistoia W, van Rietbergen B, Lochmüller EM, Lill CA, Eckstein F, Rüegsegger P (2002) Estimation of distal radius failure load with micro-finite element analysis models based on three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography images. Bone 30:842-848 (Pubitemid 34616011)
34. McLachlan GJ, Do KA, Ambroise C (2004) Analyzing microarray gene expression data. Wiley, New Jersey
35. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor 11(1):10-18
36. Feng Z (2010) Classification versus association models: should the same methods apply? Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 242:53-58
37. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273-297
38. Pinilla TP, Boardman KC, Bouxsein ML, Myers ER, Hayes WC (1996) Impact direction from a fall influences the failure load of the proximal femur as much as age-related bone loss. Calcif Tissue Int 58:231-235 (Pubitemid 26097904)
39. Keyak JH, Skinner HB, Fleming JA (2001) Effect of force direction on femoral fracture load for two types of loading conditions. J Orthop Res 19:539-544 (Pubitemid 32700964)
40. Ross PD, Norimatsu H, Davis JW, Yano K,Wasnich RD, Fujiwara S, Hosoda Y, Melton LJ (1991) A comparison of hip fracture incidence among native Japanese, Japanese Americans, and American Caucasians. Am J Epidemiol 133:801-809