Susceptibility to the rubber hand illusion does not tell the whole body-awareness story

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 297-306

  David, Nicole ^a   Fiori, Francesca ^b,c   Aglioti, Salvatore M ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c IRCCS FONDAZIONE SANTA LUCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Body awareness; Multisensory integration; Rod and frame test; Rubber hand illusion; Stroop test; Yoga

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY IMAGE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STROOP TEST; VISION; YOGA;

ADULT; BODY IMAGE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; STROOP TEST; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOGA;

EID: 84897506077     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0190-6     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aimola Davies, A. M., White, R. C., Thew, G., Aimola, N. M. V., & Davies, M. (2010). Visual capture of action, experience of ownership, and the illusion of self-touch: A new rubber hand paradigm. Perception, 39, 830-838.
2. Benavides, S., & Caballero, J. (2009). Ashtanga yoga for children and adolescents for weight management and psychological well being: An uncontrolled open pilot study. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 15, 110-114.
3. Blanke, O. (2012). Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 556-571.
4. Blanke, O., & Metzinger, T. (2009). Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 7-13.
5. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
6. Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 189-195.
7. Daunton, N., & Thomsen, D. (1979). Visual modulation of otolith-dependent units in cat vestibular nuclei. Experimental Brain Research, 37, 173-176.
8. de Vignemont, F. (2010). Body schema and body image - Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia, 48, 669-680.
9. Ehrsson, H. H., Holmes, N. P., & Passingham, R. E. (2005). Touching a rubber hand: Feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10564-10573.
10. Eshkevari, E., Rieger, E., Longo, M. R., Haggard, P., & Treasure, J. (2012). Increased plasticity of the bodily self in eating disorders. Psychological Medicine, 42, 819-828.
11. Folegatti, A., de Vignemont, F., Pavani, F., Rossetti, Y., & Farnè, A. (2009). Losing one's hand: Visual-proprioceptive conflict affects touch perception. PloS One, 4, e6920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006920
12. Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 14-21.
13. Gallagher, S. (2011). The self in the Cartesian brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1234, 100-103.
14. Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). How the body in action shapes the self. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18, 117-143.
15. Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The bodily self as power for action. Neuropsychologia, 48, 746-755.
16. Golomer, E., Cremieux, J., Dupui, P., Isableu, B., & Ohlmann, T. (1999). Visual contribution to self-induced body sway frequencies and visual perception of male professional dancers. Neuroscience Letters, 267, 189-192.
17. Haans, A., Kaiser, F. G., Bouwhuis, D. G., & Ijsselsteijn, W. A. (2012). Individual differences in the rubber-hand illusion: predicting self-reports of people's personal experiences. Acta Psychologica, 141, 169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.016
18. Ionta, S., Sforza, A., Funato, M., & Blanke, O. (2013). Anatomically plausible illusory posture affects mental rotation of body parts. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 197-209.
19. Isableu, B., Ohlmann, T., Cremieux, J., & Amblard, B. (1997). Selection of spatial frame of reference and postural control variability. Experimental Brain Research, 114, 584-589.
20. Jensen, A. R., & Rohwer, W. D., Jr. (1966). The Stroop color-word test: A review. Acta Psychologica, 25, 36-93.
21. Kammers, M. P. M., Rose, K., & Haggard, P. (2011). Feeling numb: Temperature, but not thermal pain, modulates feeling of body ownership. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1316-1321.
22. Kitadono, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Short-term effects of the "rubber hand" illusion on aspects of visual neglect. Neurocase, 13, 260-271.
23. Legrand, D. (2007). Subjectivity and the body: Introducing basic forms of self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 577-582.
24. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25. Li, W., & Matin, L. (2005). The rod-and-frame effect: The whole is less than the sum of its parts. Perception, 34, 699-716.
26. Longo, M. R., & Haggard, P. (2010). An implicit body representation underlying human position sense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 11727-11732. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003483107
27. Lopez, C., Bieri, C. P., Preuss, N., & Mast, F. W. (2012). Tactile and vestibular mechanisms underlying ownership for body parts: A non-visual variant of the rubber hand illusion. Neuroscience Letters, 511, 120-124.
28. Lopez, C., Lacour, M., Magnan, J., & Borel, L. (2006). Visual field dependence-independence before and after unilateral vestibular loss. NeuroReport, 17, 797-803. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000221843.58373.c8
29. Lopez, C., Lenggenhager, B., & Blanke, O. (2010). How vestibular stimulation interacts with illusory hand ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 33-47.
30. Lopez, C., Schreyer, H.-M., Preuss, N., & Mast, F. W. (2012). Vestibular stimulation modifies the body schema. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1830-1837.
31. Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research, 191, 1-10.
32. Matthias, E., Schandry, R., Duschek, S., & Pollatos, O. (2009). On the relationship between interoceptive awareness and the attentional processing of visual stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 154-159.
33. Mehling, W. E., Gopisetty, V., Daubenmier, J., Price, C. J., Hecht, F. M., & Stewart, A. (2009). Body awareness: construct and self-report measures. PloS One, 4, e5614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005614
34. Moseley, G. L., Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2012). Bodily illusions in health and disease: Physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical "body matrix. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 34-46.
35. Moseley, G. L., Olthof, N., Venema, A., Don, S., Wijers, M., Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2008). Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 13169-13173.
36. Pavani, F., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11, 353-359.
37. Pfeiffer, C., Lopez, C., Schmutz, V., Duenas, J. A., Martuzzi, R., & Blanke, O. (2013). Multisensory origin of the subjective first-person perspective: Visual, tactile, and vestibular mechanisms. PloS One, 8, e61751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061751
38. Porges, S. (1993). Body Perception Questionnaire. Laboratory of Developmental Assessment, University of Maryland.
39. Rohde, M., Di Luca, M., & Ernst, M. O. (2011). The rubber hand illusion: Feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PloS One, 6, e21659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021659
40. Shum, D. H. K., McFarland, K. A., & Bain, J. D. (1990). Construct validity of eight tests of attention: Comparison of normal and closed head injured samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 4, 151-162.
41. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.1. 15
42. Talsma, D., Senkowski, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 400-410. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.008
43. Tsakiris, M. (2010). My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48, 703-712. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia. 2009.09.034
44. Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 80-91.
45. Tsakiris, M., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., & Costantini, M. (2011). Just a heartbeat away from one's body: interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 2470-2476.
46. Varambally, S., & Gangadhar, B. N. (2012). Yoga: A spiritual practice with therapeutic value in psychiatry. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 5, 186-189.
47. Vibert, D., Häusler, R., & Safran, A. B. (1999). Subjective visual vertical in peripheral unilateral vestibular diseases. Journal of Vestibular Research, 9, 145-152.
48. Walsh, L. D., Moseley, G. L., Taylor, J. L., & Gandevia, S. C. (2011). Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership. The Journal of Physiology, 589, 3009-3021.
49. Witkin, H. A., & Asch, S. E. (1948). Studies in space orientation; further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 762-782.
50. Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. (1962). Psychological differentiation: Studies of development. New York, NY: Wiley.
51. Zoccolotti, P., Antonucci, G., Daini, R., Martelli, M. L., & Spinelli, D. (1997). Frame-of-reference and hierarchical-organisation effects in the rod-and-frame illusion. Perception, 26, 1485-1494.