National trends in the treatment of penile prosthesis infections by explantation alone vs. immediate salvage and reimplantation

Journal of Sexual Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1078-1085

  Zargaroff, Sherwin ^c   Sharma, Vidit ^b   Berhanu, Daniel ^b   Pearl, Jeff A ^b   Meeks, Joshua J ^b   Dupree, James M ^b   Le, Brian V ^b   Cashy, John ^b   Mcvary, Kevin T ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c New York Urological Associates Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Erectile dysfunction; Infection penile prosthesis; Salvage procedure; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; EXPLANT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH INSURANCE; HOSPITAL CHARGE; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; ICD-9-CM; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PENIS PROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; RACE; REIMPLANTATION; RURAL AREA; SALVAGE THERAPY; TEACHING HOSPITAL; TREND STUDY; URBAN AREA;

ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; INFECTION PENILE PROSTHESIS; SALVAGE PROCEDURE; SURGERY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PENILE IMPLANTATION; PENILE PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SALVAGE THERAPY; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897498268     PISSN: 17436095     EISSN: 17436109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12446     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Selvin E, Burnett AL, Platz EA. Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in the US. Am J Med 2007;120:151-157.
2. McVary KT. Clinical practice. Erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2472-2481.
3. Selph JP, Carson CC 3rd. Penile prosthesis infection: Approaches to prevention and treatment. Urol Clin North Am 2011;38:227-235.
4. Carson CC 3rd, Mulcahy JJ, Harsch MR. Long-term infection outcomes after original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis implants: Up to 7.7 years of followup. J Urol 2011;185:614-618.
5. Mandava SH, Serefoglu EC, Freier MT, Wilson SK, Hellstrom WJ. Infection retardant coated inflatable penile prostheses decrease the incidence of infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 2012;188:1855-1860.
6. Nehra A, Carson CC 3rd, Chapin AK, Ginkel AM. Long-term infection outcomes of 3-piece antibiotic impregnated penile prostheses used in replacement implant surgery. J Urol 2012;188:899-903.
7. Montague DK. Prosthetic surgery for erectile dysfunction. Chapter 27. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, eds. Campbell-Walsh urology. Vol. 4, Tenth edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2011:p780-791.
8. Brant MD, Ludlow JK, Mulcahy JJ. The prosthesis salvage operation: Immediate replacement of the infected penile prosthesis. J Urol 1996;155:155-157.
9. Kaufman JM, Kaufman JL, Borges FD. Immediate salvage procedure for infected penile prosthesis. J Urol 1998;159:816-818.
10. Teloken C, Souto JC, Da Ros C, Thorel E, Souto CA. Prosthetic penile infection: "Rescue procedure" with rifamycin. J Urol 1992;148:1905-1906.
11. Mulcahy JJ. Long-term experience with salvage of infected penile implants. J Urol 2000;163:481-482.
12. Knoll LD. Penile prosthetic infection: Management by delayed and immediate salvage techniques. Urology 1998;52:287-290.
13. Darouiche RO, Bella AJ, Boone TB, Brock G, Broderick GA, Burnett AL, Carrion R, Carson C 3rd, Christine B, Dhabuwala CB, Hakim LS, Henry G, Jones LA, Khera M, Montague DK, Nehra A. North American consensus document on infection of penile prostheses. Urology 2013;82:937-942.
14. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Introduction to the NIS. 2010. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NISIntroduction2010.pdf (accessed July 13, 2013). Website.
15. Mulcahy JJ. Penile prosthesis infection: Progress in prevention and treatment. Curr Urol Rep 2010;11:400-404.
16. Trost LW, Baum N, Hellstrom WJ. Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient. J Sex Med 2013;10:893-906.
17. Henry GD, Donatucci CF, Conners W, Greenfield JM, Carson CC, Wilson SK, Delk J, Lentz AC, Cleves MA, Jennermann CJ, Kramer AC. An outcomes analysis of over 200 revision surgeries for penile prosthesis implantation: A multicenter study. J Sex Med 2012;9:309-315.
18. Bartley J, Zimmerman WB, Dhabuwala CB. Inflatable penile prosthesis and salvage protocol for mechanical failure: Is it really necessary? J Sex Med 2012;9:2175-2181.
19. Hinds PR, Wilson SK, Sadeghi-Nejad H. Dilemmas of inflatable penile prosthesis revision surgery: What practices achieve the best outcomes and the lowest infection rates? (CME). J Sex Med 2012;9:2483-2491.
20. Wilson SK, Costerton JW. Biofilm and penile prosthesis infections in the era of coated implants: A review. J Sex Med 2012;9:44-53.
21. Mulcahy JJ, Carson CC 3rd. Long-term infection rates in diabetic patients implanted with antibiotic impregnated vs. nonimpregnated inflatable penile prostheses: 7-year outcomes. Eur Urol 2011;60:167-172.
22. Haider AH, Scott VK, Rehman KA, Velopulos C, Bentley JM, Cornwell EE 3rd, Al-Refaie W. Racial disparities in surgical care and outcomes in the United States: A comprehensive review of patient, provider, and systemic factors. J Am Coll Surg 2013;216:482-492.
23. Johnson EK, Nelson CP. Values and pitfalls of the use of administrative databases for outcomes assessment. J Urol 2013;190:17-18.
24. Hertzer NR. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample may contain inaccurate data for carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg 2012;55:263-266.