Grasping with the eyes: The role of elongation in visual recognition of manipulable objects

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 319-335

  Almeida, Jorge ^a,b,c   Mahon, Bradford Z ^d,e   Zapater Raberov, Veronica ^f   Dziuba, Aleksandra ^b   Cabaço, Tiago ^b   Marques, J Frederico ^b   Caramazza, Alfonso ^f,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^f HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dorsal stream; Object elongation; Object recognition; Tools

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HAND; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; REPETITION PRIMING;

HAND; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; REPETITION PRIMING;

EID: 84897493118     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0208-0     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abernethy, M., & Coney, J. (1993). Associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres as a function of SOA. Neuropsychologia, 31, 1397-1409.
2. Almeida, J., Fintzi, A., & Mahon, B.Z. (2013). Tool Manipulation Knowledge is Retrieved by way of the Ventral Visual Object Processing Pathway. Cortex, 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.004 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.004#doilink
3. Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychological Science, 21(6), 772-778.
4. Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(39), 15214-15218.
5. Almeida, J., Pajtas, P. E., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2013). Affect of the unconscious: Visually suppressed angry faces modulate our decisions. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 94-101.
6. Batista, A. P., Buneo, C. A., Snyder, L. H., & Andersen, R. A. (1999). Reach plans in eye-centered coordinates. Science, 285, 257-260.
7. Blake, A. (1992). Computational modelling of hand-eye coordination. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 337(1281), 351-360.
8. Boronat, C. B., Buxbaum, L. J., Coslett, H. B., Tang, K., Saffran, E. M., Kimberg, D. Y., et al. (2005). Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research, 23(2-3), 361-373.
9. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
10. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ogmen, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(8), 1572-1595.
11. Bub, D. N., & Lewine, J. (1988). Different modes of word recognition in the left and right visual fields. Brain and Language, 33, 161-188.
12. Buxbaum, L. J., Kyle, K. M., Grossman, M., & Coslett, H. B. (2007). Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: Evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex, 43(3), 411-23.
13. Cant, J. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2007). Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 713-731.
14. Carey, D. P., Harvey, M., & Milner, A. D. (1996). Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia, 34(5), 329-337.
15. Chao, L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478-484.
16. Chiarello, C., Nuding, S., & Pollock, A. (1988). Lexical decision and naming asymmetries: Influence of response selection and response bias. Brain and Language, 34, 302-314.
17. Connolly, J. D., Andersen, R. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). FMRI evidence for a "parietal reach region" in the human brain. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 140-145.
18. Culham, J. C., Cavina-Pratesi, C., & Singhal, A. (2006). The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia, 44(13), 2668-84.
19. Culham, J. C., Danckert, S., Souza, J. X. D., Gati, J., Menon, R., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Experimental Brain Research, 153(2), 180-189.
20. Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Grabowski, T., Adolphs, R., & Damasio, A. (2004). Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition, 92, 179-229.
21. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J.-F., Poline, J.-B., & Rivière, D. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4(7), 752-758.
22. Desmurget, M., Epstein, C. M., Turner, R. S., Prablanc, C., Alexander, G. E., & Grafton, S. T. (1999). Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 563-567.
23. Fang, F., & He, S. (2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8(10), 1380-1385.
24. Finkbeiner, M., Almeida, J., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Letter identification processes in reading: Distractor interference reveals a left-lateralized domain-specific mechanism. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1083-1103.
25. Finkbeiner, M., & Friedman, J. (2011). The flexibility of nonconsciously deployed cognitive processes: Evidence from masked congruence priming. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e17095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017095
26. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 116-124.
27. Garcea, F. E., Almeida, J., & Mahon, B. Z. (2012). A right visual field advantage for visual processing of manipulable objects. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(4), 813-25.
28. Goldenberg, G., & Spatt, J. (2009). The neural basis of tool use. Brain, 132(6), 1645-1655.
29. Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., Milner, A. D., & Perrett, D. I. (1994a). The nature and limits of orientation and pattern processing supporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 46-56.
30. Goodale, M. A., Meenan, J. P., Bülthoff, H. H., Nicolle, D. A., Murphy, K. J., & Racicot, C. I. (1994b). Separate visual pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology, 4, 604-610.
31. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20-25.
32. Goodale, M. A., Pelisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320(6064), 748-50.
33. Grill-Spector, K., Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research, 41(10-11), 1409-1422.
34. Haaland, K. Y., Harrington, D. L., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain, 123, 2306-2313.
35. Handy, T. C., Grafton, S. T., Shroff, N. M., Ketay, S., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2003). Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 421-427.
36. Helbig, H. B., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2006). The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 174(2), 221-228.
37. Hesselmann, G., & Malach, R. (2011). The link between fMRI-BOLD activation and perceptual awareness is 'stream-invariant' in the human visual system. Cerebral Cortex, 21(12), 2829-37.
38. Hunter, Z. R., & Brysbaert, M. (2008). Visual half-field experiments are a good measure of cerebral language dominance if used properly: Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 46, 316-325.
39. Iberall, T., Bingham, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1986). Opposition Space as a Structuring Concept for the Analysis of Skilled Hand Movements. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.), Generation and Modulation of Action Patterns (pp. 158-173). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
40. James, T. W., Humphrey, G. K., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams. Neuron, 35(4), 793-801.
41. Jiang, Y., & He, S. (2006). Cortical responses to invisible faces: Dissociating subsystems for facial-information processing. Current Biology, 16, 2023-2029.
42. Johnson-Frey, S. H. (2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 71-78.
43. Johnson-Frey, S., Newman-Norland, R., & Grafton, S. (2005). A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 681-695.
44. Kellenbach, M. L., Brett, M., & Patterson, K. (2003). Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 20-46.
45. Klatzky, R. L., McCloskey, B., Doherty, S., Pellegrino, J., & Smith, T. (1987). Knowledge about hand shaping and knowledge about objects. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 187-213.
46. Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2000). Semantic priming by pictures and words in the cerebral hemispheres. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 91-98.
47. Lederman, S. J., & Wing, A. M. (2003). Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 156-165.
48. Lewis, J. W. (2006). Cortical networks related to human use of tools. The Neuroscientist, 12(3), 211-231.
49. Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science, 245(4919), 761-763.
50. Lovseth, K., & Atchley, R. A. (2010). Examining lateralized semantic access using pictures. Brain & Cognition, 2, 202-209.
51. Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2005). The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 480-494.
52. Mahon, B., Kumar, N., & Almeida, J. (2013). Spatial frequency tuning reveals visuomotor interactions between the dorsal and ventral visual systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(6), 862-871. doi: 10.1162/jocn-a-00370
53. Mahon, B. Z., Milleville, S., Negri, G. A. L., Rumiati, R. I., Caramazza, A., & Martin, A. (2007). Action-related properties of objects shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron, 55(3), 507-520.
54. Mahon, B. Z., & Wu, W. (in press). Cognitive Penetration of the Dorsal Visual Stream? In J. Zeimbekis & A. Raftopoulos (Eds.), Cognitive Penetration. Oxford University Press
55. Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-45.
56. Miceli, G., Fouch, E., Capasso, R., Shelton, J. R., Tamaiuolo, F., & Caramazza, A. (2001). The dissociation of color from form and function knowledge. Nature Neuroscience, 4(6), 662-667.
57. Miller, E. K., Nieder, A., Freedman, D. J., & Wallis, J. D. (2003). Neural correlates of categories and concepts. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(2), 198-203.
58. Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (2000). Selectivity for the shape, size and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83(5), 2580-2601.
59. Noppeney, U., Price, C., Penny, W., & Friston, K. (2006). Two distinct neural mechanisms for category selective responses. Cerebral Cortex, 16(3), 437-445.
60. Pasley, B. N., Mayes, L. C., & Schultz, R. T. (2004). Subcortical discrimination of unperceived objects during binocular rivalry. Neuron, 42, 163-172.
61. Perenin, M. T., & Vighetto, A. (1988). Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms i. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain, 111(3), 643-674.
62. Prado, J., Clavagnier, S., Otzenberger, H., Scheiber, C., Kennedy, H., & Perenin, M. T. (2005). Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision. Neuron, 48(5), 849-58.
63. Rolls, E. T., & Tovee, M. J. (1994). Processing speed in the cerebral-cortex and the neurophysiology of visual masking. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 257(1348), 9-15.
64. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
65. Sakata, H., Taira, M., Kusunoki, M., Murata, A., Tanaka, Y., & Tsutsui, K. (1998). Neural coding of 3D features of objects for hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353(1373), 1363-1373.
66. Shikata, E., Hamzei, F., Glauche, V., Knab, R., Dettmers, C., Weiller, C., & Buchel, C. (2001). Surface orientation discrimination activates caudal and anterior intraparietal sulcus in humans: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 1309-1314.
67. Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J. R., & Poncet, M. (1991). The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. Brain, 114, 2555-2573.
68. Song, J., & Nakayama, K. (2008). Numeric comparison in a visually-guided manual reaching task. Cognition, 106, 994-1003.
69. Sterzer, P., Haynes, J. D., & Rees, G. (2008). Fine-scale activity patterns within high-level ventral visual areas encode the category of invisible objects. Journal of Vision, 8(15), 1-12.
70. Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753-759.
71. Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). A neural basis for the retrieval of conceptual knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1319-1327.
72. Tsuchiya, N., & Koch, C. (2005). Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1096-1101.
73. Yang, E., & Blake, R. (2012). Deconstructing continuous flash suppression. Journal of Vision, 12(3), 1-14.