Potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as a biorefinery crop

Industrial Crops and Products

Volumn 56, Issue , 2014, Pages 231-240

  Gunnarsson, I B ^a   Svensson, S E ^b   Johansson, E ^b   Karakashev, D ^a   Angelidaki, I ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Biorefinery; Harvest occasion; Inulin; Jerusalem artichoke; Lignocellulose

Indexed keywords

BIOCONVERSION; BIOETHANOL; CELLULOSE; CLONING; CROPS; ETHANOL; HARVESTING; PRODUCTIVITY; PROTEINS; REFINING;

BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY; BIOREFINERIES; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; DEGREE OF POLYMERIZATION; INULIN; JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE; LIGNOCELLULOSE;

BIOMASS;

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; BIOFUEL; BIOMASS; BIOMASS POWER; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DICOTYLEDON; DIET; ENERGY CROP; ETHANOL; HARVESTING; NUTRITIVE VALUE; POLYSACCHARIDE; PROTEIN; REFINING INDUSTRY;

BAGASSE; CELLULOSE; CLONES; FARM CROPS; FORESTS; HARVESTING; HELIANTHUS; PROTEINS; SUGAR CANE; WHEAT STRAW;

EID: 84897469438     PISSN: 09266690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Amaducci S., Amaducci M.T., Benati R., Venturi G. Crop yield and quality parameters of four annual fibre crops (hemp, kenaf, maize and sorghum) in the North of Italy. Ind. Crops Prod. 2000, 11:179-186.
2. Baldini M., Danuso F., Monti A., Amaducci M.T., Stevanato P., De Mastro G. Chicory and Jerusalem artichoke productivity in different areas of Italy, in relation to water availability and time of harvest. Ital. J. Agron. 2006, 1:291-307.
3. Barclay T., Ginic-Markovic M. Inulin: A versatile polysaccharide with multiple pharmaceutical and food chemical uses. J. Excipients Food Chem. 2010, 1:27-50.
4. Bergh J., Freeman M., Sigurdsson B., Kellomäki S., Laitinen K., Niinistö S., Peltola H., Linder S. Modelling the short-term effects of climate change on the productivity of selected tree species in Nordic countries. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 183:327-340.
5. Bont, J., De, Teunissen, A., 2013. Yeast strains that consume uronic acids and produce fermentation products such as ethanol. EP Patent: 2,546,336.
6. Carriquiry M.A., Du X., Timilsina G.R. Second generation biofuels: economics and policies. Energy Policy 2011, 39:4222-4234.
7. Carroll A., Somerville C. Cellulosic biofuels. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60:165-182.
8. Chabbert N., Braun P., Guiraud J.P., Arnoux M., Galzy P. Productivity and fermentability of Jerusalem Artichoke according to harvesting date. Biomass 1983, 3:209-224.
9. Cheng Y., Zhou W., Gao C., Lan K., Gao Y., Wu Q. Biodiesel production from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus Tuberosus L.) tuber by heterotrophic microalgae Chlorella protothecoides. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84:777-781.
10. Curt M.D., Aguado P., Sanz M., Sánchez G., Fernández J. Clone precocity and the use of Helianthus tuberosus L. stems for bioethanol. Ind. Crops Prod. 2006, 24:314-320.
11. Del Río J.C., Rencoret J., Prinsen P., Martínez A.T., Ralph J., Gutiérrez A. Structural characterization of wheat straw lignin as revealed by analytical pyrolysis, 2D-NMR, and reductive cleavage methods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60:5922-5935.
12. Dische Z. A new specific color reaction of hexuronic acids. J. Biol. Chem. 1947, 171:725-730.
13. Dumas J.B.A. Procedes de l'Analyse Organique. Ann. Chim. Phys. 1831, 247:198-213.
14. Edwards M.C., Doran-Peterson J. Pectin-rich biomass as feedstock for fuel ethanol production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 95:565-575.
15. Eugene W., Rice, Rodger B., Baird, Andrew D., Eaton L.S.C. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Am. Water Work Assoc. Public Work. Assoc. Environ. Fed. 2012, 1469.
16. Flamm G., Glinsmann W., Kritchevsky D., Prosky L., Roberfroid M. Inulin and oligofructose as dietary fiber: a review of the evidence. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2001, 41:353-362.
17. Fuchs A. Potentials for non-food utilization of fructose and inulin. Starch Stärke 1987, 39:335-343.
18. Galambos J.T. The reaction of carbazole with carbohydrates: I. effect of borate and sulfamate on the carbazole color of sugars. Anal. Biochem. 1967, 19:119-132.
19. Godin B., Lamaudière S., Agneessens R., Schmit T., Goffart J.-P., Stilmant D., Gerin P.A., Delcarte J. Chemical characteristics and biofuel potential of several vegetal biomasses grown under a wide range of environmental conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 48:1-12.
20. Goldemberg J., Guardabassi P. The potential for first-generation ethanol production from sugarcane. Biofuels. Bioprod. Biorefining 2010, 4:17-24.
21. Gunnarson S., Malmberg A., Mathisen B., Theander O., Thyselius L., Wünsche U. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) for biogas production. Biomass 1985, 7:85-97.
22. Johansson E., Svensson G. Variation in bread-making quality: effects of weather parameters on protein concentration and quality in some Swedish wheat cultivars grown during the period 1975-1996. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1998, 78:109-118.
23. Kadam K.L., McMillan J.D. Availability of corn stover as a sustainable feedstock for bioethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 88:17-25.
24. Kaur N., Gupta A.K. Applications of inulin and oligofructose in health and nutrition. J. Biosci. 2002, 27:703-714.
25. Kays S.J., Nottingham S.F. Classification, identification, and distribution. Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke 2007, 29-34. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
26. Kays S.J., Nottingham S.F. Pollinators, pests, and diseases. Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke 2007, 365-382. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
27. Kays S.J., Nottingham S.F. Developmental biology, resource allocation, and yield. Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke 2007, 269-364. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
28. Kays S.J., Nottingham S.F. Biomass and biofuel. Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke 2007, 127-148. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
29. Kays S.J., Nottingham S.F. Chemical composition and inulin chemistry. Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke 2007, 53-96. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
30. Kays S.J., Nottingham S.F. Economics. Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke 2007, 407-421. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
31. Kim S.R., Ha S.-J., Kong I.I., Jin Y.-S. High expression of XYL2 coding for xylitol dehydrogenase is necessary for efficient xylose fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2012, 14:336-343.
32. Kosaric N., Cosentino G.P., Wieczorek A., Duvnjak Z. The Jerusalem artichoke as an agricultural crop. Biomass 1984, 5:1-36.
33. Kötter P., Ciriacy M. Xylose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1993, 38:776-783.
34. Li L., Li L., Wang Y., Du Y., Qin S. Biorefinery products from the inulin-containing crop Jerusalem artichoke. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35:471-477.
35. Lindberg J.E., Malmberg A., Theander O. The chemical composition and nutritive value for ruminants of four possible energy crops and their residues of anaerobic fermentation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1986, 15:197-213.
36. Malik A.H., Kuktaite R., Johansson E. Combined effect of genetic and environmental factors on the accumulation of proteins in the wheat grain and their relationship to bread-making quality. J. Cereal Sci. 2013, 57:170-174.
37. Matías J., González J., Cabanillas J., Royano L. Influence of NPK fertilisation and harvest date on agronomic performance of Jerusalem artichoke crop in the Guadiana Basin (Southwestern Spain). Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 48:191-197.
38. McLaurin W.J., Somda Z.C., Kays S.J. Jerusalem artichoke growth, development, and field storage. I. Numerical assessment of plant part development and dry matter acquisition and allocation. J. Plant Nutr. 1999, 22:1303-1313.
39. Menon V., Rao M. Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: Biofuels, platform chemicals & biorefinery concept. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38:522-550.
40. Mohnen D. Pectin structure and biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11:266-277.
41. Mosier N., Wyman C., Dale B., Elander R., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M., Ladisch M. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:673-686.
42. Mosse J. Nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor for ten cereals and six legumes or oilseeds. A reappraisal of its definition and determination. Variation according to species and to seed protein content. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990, 38:18-24.
43. Nakamura T., Ogata Y., Hamada S., Ohta K. Ethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke tubers by Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1996, 81:564-566.
44. Osborn H.T., Akoh C.C. Structured lipids-novel fats with medical, nutraceutical, and food applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety 2002, 1:110-120.
45. Philp J.C., Ritchie R.J., Allan J.E.M. Biobased chemicals: the convergence of green chemistry with industrial biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31:219-222.
46. Prosky L., Hoebregs H. Methods to determine food inulin and oligofructose. J. Nutr. 1999, 129:1418S-1423S.
47. Saengkanuk A., Nuchadomrong S., Jogloy S., Patanothai A., Srijaranai S. A simplified spectrophotometric method for the determination of inulin in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2011, 233:609-616.
48. Sakdaronnarong C., Jonglertjunya W. Rice straw and sugarcane bagasse degradation mimicking lignocellulose decay in nature: an alternative approach to biorefinery. ScienceAsia 2012, 38:364.
49. Sangeetha P.T., Ramesh M.N., Prapulla S.G. Recent trends in the microbial production, analysis and application of Fructooligosaccharides. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 16:442-457.
50. Seppälä M., Laine A., Rintala J. Screening of novel plants for biogas production in northern conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 139:355-362.
51. Sheldon R.A. Utilisation of biomass for sustainable fuels and chemicals: molecules, methods and metrics. Catal. Today 2011, 167:3-13.
52. Slauffer M.D., Chubey B.B., Dorrell D.G. Growth, yield and compositional characteristics of Jerusalem artichoke as they relate to biomass production. Fuels Biomass 1981, 193-203.
53. Slimestad R., Seljaasen R., Meijer K., Skar S.L. Norwegian-grown Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.): morphology and content of sugars and fructo-oligosaccharides in stems and tubers. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90:956-964.
54. Sluiter A., Hames B., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluiter J., Templeton D., Crocker D. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass, laboratory analytical procedure 2008, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
55. Sluiter A., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluiter J., Templeton D. Determination of Extractives in Biomass, Laboratory Analytical Procedure 2005, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
56. Srithongkham S., Vivitchanont L., Krongtaew C. Starch/cellulose biocomposites prepared by high-shear homogenization/compression molding. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2012, 2:213-222.
57. Suurs R.A.A., Hekkert M.P. Competition between first and second generation technologies: lessons from the formation of a biofuels innovation system in the Netherlands. Energy 2009, 34:669-679.
58. Swedish Standards Institute Extraction and Determination of Phosphorous, Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium and Sodium from Soils with Ammonium Lactate/Acetic Acid Solution 1993, Swedish Standards Institute, Stockholm.
59. Swedish Standards Institute Soil Improvers and Growing Media - Extraction of Calcium Chloride/DTPA (CAT) Soluble Nutrients 2002, Swedish Standards Institute, Stockholm.
60. Thomsen A.B., Rasmussen S.K., Bohn V., Nielsen K.V., Thygesen A. Hemp raw materials: The effect of cultivar growth conditions and pretreatment on the chemical composition of the fibres 2005, Roskilde.
61. Transparency Market Research Prebiotic Ingredients (FOS, GOS, MOS, Inulin) Market for Food & Beverage, Dietary Supplements & Animal Feed - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Trends, and Forecast, 2012-2018. Albany 2013.
62. Van Loo J. The specificity of the interaction with intestinal bacterial fermentation by prebiotics determines their physiological efficacy. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2004, 17:89-98.
63. Van Loo J.A.E. Prebiotics promote good health: the basis, the potential, and the emerging evidence. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2004, 38:70-75.
64. Young V.R., Pellett P.L. Plant proteins in relation to human protein and amino acid nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994, 59:1203S-1212S.
65. Zhang W., Geng A. Improved ethanol production by a xylose-fermenting recombinant yeast strain constructed through a modified genome shuffling method. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5:46.
66. Zhu L., O'Dwyer J.P., Chang V.S., Granda C.B., Holtzapple M.T. Structural features affecting biomass enzymatic digestibility. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:3817-3828.
67. Zhuang D., Jiang D., Liu L., Huang Y. Assessment of bioenergy potential on marginal land in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15:1050-1056.
68. Zubr J. Methanogenic fermentation of fresh and ensiled plant materials. Biomass 1986, 11:159-171.