The economic geography of ex situ conservation

Animal Conservation

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 104-105

  Martin, T E ^a   Lurbiecki, H ^b   Mooers, A O ^b  

^a Department of Biological Sciences and IRMACS Simon Fraser University ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ECOTOURISM; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS;

EID: 84897441958     PISSN: 13679430     EISSN: 14691795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/acv.12123     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AZE (2014). Alliance for Zero Extinction. Accessed from http://www.zeroextinction.org
2. Balmford, A., Leader-Williams, N. & Green, M.J.B. (1996). Parks or arks: where to conserve threatened mammals? Biodivers. Conserv. 4, 595-607.
3. Bowkett, A. (2014). Ex situ conservation planning is more complicated than prioritising the keeping of threatened species in zoos. Anim. Conserv. 17, 101-103.
4. Bowkett, A.E. (2009). Recent captive breeding proposals and the return of the ark concept to global species conservation. Conserv. Biol. 23, 773-776.
5. Butchart, S.H.M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J.P.W. etal. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 1164-1168.
6. Conde, D.A., Flesness, N., Colchero, F., Jones, O.R. & Scheuerlein, A. (2011). An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science 331, 1390-1391.
7. Conde, D.A., Colchero, F., Gusset, M., Pearce-Kelly, P., Byers, O., Flesness, N., Browne, R.K. & Jones, O.R. (2013). Zoos through the lens of the IUCN Red List: a global metapopulation approach to support conservation breeding programs. PLoS ONE 8, e80311.
8. Fa, J.E., Funk, S.M. & O'Connell, D.M. (2011). Zoo conservation biology: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Fa, J.E., Gusset, M., Flesness, N. & Conde, D.A. (2014). Zoos have yet to unveil their full conservation potential. Anim. Conserv. 17, 97-100.
10. Frynta, D., Šimková, O., Lišková, S. & Landová, E. (2013). Mammalian collection on Noah's ark: the effects of beauty, brain and body size. PLoS ONE 8, e63110.
11. Gupta, B.K. (2012). Zoos in India: from menageries to naturalistic enclosures. Solitaire 23, 22-25.
12. Kolby, J. (2013). Establishing the Honduras amphibian rescue and conservation centre. Biodivers. Sci. 9. Accessed from http://www.biodiversityscience.com/2013/04/10/honduran-amphibian-rescue-conservation-center/
13. Martin, T.E., Lurbiecki, H., Joy, J.B. & Mooers, A.O. (2014). Mammal and bird species held in zoos are less endemic and less threatened than their close relatives not held in zoos. Anim. Conserv. 17, 89-96.
14. Mittermeier, R.A. & Mittermeier, C.G. (1997). Megadiversity: Earth's biologically wealthiest nations: Monterrey: CEMEX.
15. Pritchard, D.J., Fa, J.E., Oldfield, S. & Harrop, S.H. (2011). Bring the captive closer to the wild: redefining the role of ex situ conservation. Oryx 46, 18-23.
16. Rahbek, C. (1993). Captive breeding - a useful tool in the preservation of biodiversity? Biodivers. Conserv. 2, 426-437.
17. Snyder, N.F.R., Derrickson, S.R., Beissinger, S.R., Wiley, J.W., Smith, T.B., Toone, W.D. & Miller, B. (1996). Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conserv. Biol. 10, 338-348.
18. Thomas, C.D., Cameron, A., Green, R.E., Bakkenes, M., Beaumont, L.J. etal. (2004). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145-148.
19. WAZA (2014).World Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Accessed from http://www.waza.org