Mammalian Collection on Noah's Ark: The Effects of Beauty, Brain and Body Size

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Frynta, Daniel ^a   Šimková, Olga ^a   Lišková, Silvie ^a   Landová, Eva ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; BODY WEIGHT; BRAIN SIZE; BREEDING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FAMILIA; MAMMAL; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; POPULATION SIZE; SPECIES RICHNESS; ZOO; ZOO ANIMAL;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BODY SIZE; BRAIN; MAMMALS;

EID: 84877759189     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063110     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, et al. (2002) The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bio Science 52: 891-904.
2. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, et al. (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313: 58-61.
3. Wilson EO (2002) The future of life. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
4. Marton-Lefèvre J, (2010) Biodiversity is our life. Science 327: 1179.
5. Soulé M, Gilpin M, Conway W, Foose T, (1986) The millenium Ark: How long a voyage, how many staterooms, how many passengers? Zoo Biol 5: 101-113.
6. McGregor Reid G, Zippel KC, (2008) Can zoos and aquariums ensure the survival of amphibians in the 21st century? Int Zoo Yearb 42: 1-6.
7. Rees PA, (2005) Will the EC Zoos Directive increase the conservation value of zoo research? Oryx 39: 128-131.
8. Gippoliti S, (2012) Ex situ conservation programmes in European zoological gardens: Can we afford to lose them? Biodivers Conserv 21: 1359-1364.
9. Ebenhard T, (1995) Conservation breeding as a tool for saving snímal species from extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 438-443.
10. Stanley Price MR, Soorae PS, (2003) Reintroductions: whence and whither? Int Zoo Yearb 38: 61-75.
11. Bowkett AE, (2009) Recent captive-breeding proposals and the return of the ark concept to global species conservation. Conserv Biol 23: 773-776.
12. Soulé ME (1980) Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA, editors. Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-ecological Perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. pp. 151-169.
13. Reed DH, Nicholas AC, Stratton GE, (2007) Genetic quality of individuals impacts population dynamics. Anim Conserv 10: 275-283.
14. Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15. Lande R (1999) Extinction risks from anthropogenic, ecological, and genetics factors. In: Landweber LF, Dobson AP, editors. Genetics and the extinction of species: DNA and the conservation of biodiversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 1-23.
16. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Frynta D, Marešová J, Landová E, Lišková S, Šimková O, et al. (2009) Are animals in zoos rather conspicuous than endangered? In: Columbus AM, Kuznetsov L, editors. Endangered species: new research. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers. pp. 299-341.
18. Conde DA, Flesness N, Colchero F, Jones OR, Scheuerlein A, (2011) An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science 331: 1390-1391.
19. Hale KA, Briskie JV, (2007) Challenges to understanding the consequences of population bottlenecks for the conservation of endangered wildlife. Anim Conserv 10: 19-21.
20. Roberts L, (1988) Beyond Noah's Ark: what do we need to know? Science 242: 1247.
21. Snyder NFR, Derrickson SR, Beissinger SR, Wiley JW, Smith TB, et al. (1996) Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conserv Biol 10: 338-348.
22. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, (2000) An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biol Conserv 96: 1-11.
23. Mathews F, Orros M, McLaren G, Gelling M, Foster R, (2005) Keeping fit on the ark: assessing the suitability of captive-bred animals for release. Biol Conserv 121: 569-577.
24. Lees CM, Wilcken J, (2009) Sustaining the Ark: the challenges faced by zoos in maintaining viable populations. Int Zoo Yearb 43: 6-18.
25. Earnhardt JM (2010) The role of captive populations in reintroduction programs. In: Kleiman DG, Thompson KV, Baer CK, editors. Wild Mammals In Captivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 268-280.
26. Volf J (2009) Half a century of international cooperation in the preservation of the Przewalski Horse- direction: reintroduction. In: Anonymous, editor. Equus 2009. Prague, CZ: Zoo. pp. 39-56.
27. Freese CH, Aune KE, Boyd DP, Derr JN, Forrest SC, et al. (2007) Second chance for the plains bison. Biol Conserv 136: 175-184.
28. Ahrens TG, (1921) The present status of the European bison or wisent. J Mammal 2: 58-62.
29. Pucek Z, editor (2002) European bison: current state of the species and an action plan for its conservation. Species Action Plan, LHI-WWF.
30. Tokarska M, Kawałko A, Wójcik JM, Pertoldi C, (2009) Genetic variability in the European bison (Bison bonasus) population from Białowieża forest over 50 years. Bio J Linn Soc 97: 801-809.
31. Jiang Z, Yu C, Feng Z, Zhang L, Xia J, et al. (2000) Reintroduction and recovery of Père David's deer in China. Wildlife Soc B 28: 681-687.
32. Stanley Price MR (1989) Animal re-introductions, the Arabian Oryx in Oman. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
33. Saltz D, Rubenstein DI, (1995) Population dynamics of a reintroduced Asiatic wild ass (Equus Hemionus) herd. Ecol Appl 5: 327-335.
34. Stoinski TS, Beck BB, (2004) Changes in locomotor and foraging skills in captive-born, reintroduced golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia rosalia). Am J Primatol 62: 1-13.
35. Dobson A, Lyles A, (2000) Black-footed ferret recovery. Science 288: 985-988.
36. Leader-Williams N, Balmford A, Linkie M, Mace GM, Smith RJ, et al. (2007) Beyond the ark: conservation biologists' views of the achievements of zoos in conservation. In: Zimmermann A, Hatchwell M, Dickie L, West C, editors. Zoos in the 21st Century: Catalysts for Conservation? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 236-254.
37. Dietz JM, Dietz LA, Nagagata EY (1994) The effective use of flagship species for conservation of biodiversity: the example of lion tamarins in Brazil. In: Olney PJS, Mace GM, Feistner ATC (eds) Creative conservation: interactive management of wild and captive animals. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 32-49.
38. Zimmermann A (2010) The role of zoos in contributing to in situ conservation. In: Kleiman DG, Thompson KV, Baer CK, editors. Wild mammals in captivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 281-287.
39. Mazur N, Clark TW, (2000) Zoos and conservation: policy making and organizational challenges. Yale F&ES Bulletin 105: 1-17.
40. Bitgood S, Patterson D, (1987) Principles of exhibit design. Visitor Behavior 2: 4-6.
41. Puan CL, Zakaria M, (2007) Perception of visitors towards the role of zoos: a Malaysian perspective. Int Zoo Yearb 41: 226-232.
42. Moss A, Esson M, (2010) Visitor interest in zoo animals and the implications for collection planning and zoo education programmes. Zoo Biol 29: 715-731.
43. Frynta D, Lišková S, Bültmann S, Burda H, (2010) Being attractive brings advantages: the case of parrot species in captivity. PLoS ONE 5: e12568.
44. Marešová J, Frynta D, (2008) Noah's Ark is full of common species attractive to humans: The case of boid snakes in zoos. Ecol Econ 64: 554-558.
45. Balmford A, Mace GM, Leader-Williams N, (1996) Designing the Ark: setting priorities for captive breeding. Conserv Biol 10: 719-727.
46. Ericson PG, Anderson CL, Britton T, Elzanowski A, Johansson US, et al. (2006) Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils. Biol Letters 2: 543-547.
47. Portmann A (1979) Nové cesty biologie. In: Fiala J, Neubauer Z, Pinc Z, editors. Scientia & Philosophia 7 (1997). Praha: Katedra matematické logiky a filosofie matematiky, Matematicko-fyzikální fakulta UK.
48. Berlin B (1992) Ethnobiological Classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Wilson DE, Reeder DAM, editors (2005) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference (3rd ed). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins, University Press. Checklist available on: http://nmnhgoph.si.edu/msw/.
50. Nowak RM (1999) Walker's mammals of the world. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
51. Jerison HJ, (1955) Brain to body ratios and the evolution of intelligence. Science 121: 447-449.
52. Jerison HJ, (1963) Interpreting the evolution of the brain. Hum Biol 35: 263-291.
53. Jerison HJ (1973) Evolution of the brain and intelligence. New York: Academic Press.
54. Ashwell KWS, (2008) Encephalization of Australian and New Guinean marsupials. Brain Behav Evol 71: 181-199.
55. Whitfield P, editor (1984) Longman illustrated animal encyclopedia. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman.
56. Anděra M (1997-2000) Svět zvířat I-III. Savci 1-3. Praha, Albatros.
57. Hutchins M, Kleiman DG, Geist V, McDade MC, editors (2004) Grzimek's animal life encyclopedia, 2nd edition. Volumes 12-16, Mammals I-V. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group.
58. Myers P, Espinosa R, Parr CS, Jones T, Hammond GS, et al. (2013) The Animal Diversity Web. Available: http://animaldiversity.org.
59. Central Intelligence Agency. "Country Comparison: Distribution of family income- Gini index".cia.gov. Central Intelligence Agency, n.d. Web. 27 Mar. 2013. Available: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html.
60. Veríssimo D, Fraser I, Groombridge J, Bristol R, MacMillan DC, (2009) Birds as turism flagship species: a case study of tropical islands. Anim Conserv 12: 549-558.
61. Schlegel J, Rupf R, (2010) Attitudes towards potential animal flagship species in nature conservation: A survey among students of different educational institutions. J Nat Conserv 18: 278-290.
62. Marešová J, Krása A, Frynta D, (2009) We all appreciate the same animals: cross-cultural comparison of human aesthetic preferences for snake species in Papua New Guinea and Europe. Ethology 115: 297-300.
63. Frynta D, Petrů M, Šklíba J, Šumbera R, Krása A, et al. (2011) Crosscultural agreement in perception of animal beauty: Boid snakes viewed by people from three continents. Hum Ecol 39: 829-834.
64. Cunningham MR, Roberts AR, Barbee AP, Druen PB, Wu C, (1995) "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol 68: 261-279.
65. Entwistle AC, Stephenson PJ (2000) Small mammals and the conservation agenda. In: Entwistle A, Dunstone N, editors. Priorities for theConservation of Mammalian Diversity. Has the Panda had its Day? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 119-139.
66. SPSS Inc. (2007) Spss, version 16.0. Available: http://www.winwrap.com.
67. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Austria: Vienna.
68. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Felsenstein J, (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125: 1-15.
70. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Cardillo M, Jones KE, MacPhee RDE, Beck RMD, et al. (2007) The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446: 507-512.
71. Arnason U, Adegoke JA, Bodin K, Born EW, Esa YB, et al. (2002) Mammalian mitogenomic relationships and the root of the Eutherian tree. P Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 8151-8156.
72. Meredith RW, Westerman M, Springer MS, (2009) A phylogeny of Diprotodontia (Marsupialia) based on sequences for five nuclear genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 51: 554-571.
73. Barros MC, Sampaio I, Schneider H, (2008) Novel 12S mtDNA findings in sloths (Pilosa, Folivora) and anteaters (Pilosa, Vermilingua) suggest a true case of long branch attraction. Genet Mol Biol 31: 793-799.
74. Agnarsson I, May-Collado LJ, (2008) The phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla: The importance of dense taxon sampling, missing data, and the remarkable promise of cytochrome b to provide reliable species-level phylogenies. Mol Phylogenet Evol 48: 964-985.
75. Dalerum F, (2007) Phylogenetic reconstruction of carnivore social organizations. J Zool 273: 90-97.
76. Flynn JJ, Finarelli JA, Zehr S, Hsu J, Nedbal MA, (2005) Assessing the impact of increased sampling on resolving enigmatic relationships. Syst Biol 54: 317-337.
77. Blanga-Kanfi S, Miranda H, Penn O, Pupko T, DeBry RW, et al. (2009) Rodent phylogeny revised: analysis of six nuclear genes from all major rodent clades. BMC Evol Biol 9: 71.
78. Huchon D, Douzery EJP, (2001) From the Old World to the New World: a molecular chronicle of the phylogeny and biogeography of Hystricognath rodents. Mol Phylogenet Evol 20: 238-251.
79. Jansa SA, Giarlaa TC, Lim BK, (2009) The phylogenetic position of the rodent genus Typhlomys and the geographic origin of Muroidea. J Mammal 90: 1083-1094.
80. Jansa SA, Weksler M, (2004) Phylogeny of muroid rodents: relationships within and among major lineages as determined by IRBP gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31: 256-276.
81. Chatterjee HJ, Ho SYW, Barnes I, Groves C, (2009) Estimating the phylogeny and divergence times of primates using a supermatrix approach. BMC Evol Biol 9: 259.
82. Martins EP (2001) COMPARE Version 4.4. Computer Programs for Statistical Analysis of Comparative Data. Available: http://compare.bio.indiana.edu.
83. Garland T, Harvey PH, Ives AR, (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol 41: 18-32.
84. StatSoft (2001) Statistica, version 6.0. Available: http://www.statsoft.com.
85. Gunnthorsdottir A, (2001) Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation. Anthrozoos 14: 204-215.
86. Metrick A, Weitzman ML, (1996) Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation. Land Econ 72: 1.
87. Kleiber M, (1932) Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia 6: 315-353.
88. Kleiber M (1961) The fire of life: an introduction to animal energetics. New York: Wiley.
89. Schmidt-Nielsen K (1984) Scaling: why is animal size so important? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
90. Anonymous (1996) Gutachten über Mindestanforderungen an die Haltung von Säudetieren. BMVEL Bonn.
91. Balmford A, (2000) Separating fact from artifact in analyses of zoo visitor preferences. Conserv Biol 14: 1193-1195.
92. Deaner RO, Isler K, Burkart J, van Schaik C, (2007) Overall brain size, and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates. Brain Behav Evol 70: 115-124.
93. Reader SM, Laland KN, (2002) Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. P Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 4436-4441.
94. Overington SE, Morand-Ferronb J, Boogerta NJ, Lefebvrea L, (2009) Technical innovations drive the relationship between innovativeness and residual brain size in birds. Anim Behav 78: 1001-1010.
95. Roth G, Dicke U, (2005) Evolution of the brain and intelligence. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 250-257.
96. Shettleworth SJ, (2003) Memory and hippocampal specialization in food-storing birds: challenges for research on comparative cognition. Brain Behav Evol 62: 108-116.
97. Macphail EM, Bolhuis JJ, (2001) The evolution of intelligence: adaptive specializations versus general process. Biol rev Camb Philos 76: 341-364.
98. Fagen R, (1974) Selective and evolutionary aspects of animal play. Am Nat 108: 850-858.
99. Iwaniuk AN, Nelson JE, Pellis SM, (2001) Do big-brained animals play more? Comparative analyses of play and relative brain size in mammals. J Comp Psychol 115: 29-41.
100. Margulis SW, Hoyos C, Anderson M, (2003) Effect of felid activity on zoo visitor interest. Zoo Biol 22: 587-599.
101. Callicott JB, (1990) Whither conservation ethics? Conserv Biol 4: 15-20.
102. Margules CR, Pressey RL, (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243-253.
103. Smith RJ, Veríssimo D, MacMillan DC (2011) Marketing and conservation: how to lose friends and in fluence people. In: Leader-Williams N, Adams W, Smith R, editors. Trade-Offs in conservation: deciding what to save. pp. 215-232. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
104. Isaac NJ, Turvey ST, Collen B, Waterman C, Baillie JE, (2007) Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLoS ONE 2: e296.
105. Verissimo D, MacMillan DC, Smith RJ, (2011) Toward a systematic approach for identifying conservation flagships. Conserv Lett 4: 1-8.
106. Smith RJ, Veríssimo D, Isaac NJB, Jones KE, (2012) Identifying Cinderella species: uncovering mammals with conservation flagship appeal. Conserv Lett 5: 205-212.
107. White PCL, Gregory KW, Lindley PJ, Richards G, (1997) Economic values of threatened mammals in Britain: A case study of the otter Lutra lutra and the watervole Arvicola terrestris. Biol Conserv 82: 345-354.
108. Kaltenborn BP, Bjerke T, Nyahongo JW, Williams DR, (2006) Animal preferences and acceptability of wildlife management actions around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Biodivers Conserv 15: 4633-4649.
109. Bowen-Jones E, Entwistle A, (2002) Identifying appropriate flagship species: the importance of culture and local contexts. Oryx 36: 189-195.