Comparison of text and video computer-tailored interventions for smoking cessation: Randomized controlled trial

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Stanczyk, Nicola ^a   Bolman, Catherine ^b   Van Adrichem, Mathieu ^a   Candel, Math ^a   Muris, Jean ^a   De Vries, Hein ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Delivery strategy; Educational level; Multiple computer tailoring; Smoking cessation; Text messages; Video messages

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING CESSATION; TEXT MESSAGING; VIDEORECORDING;

COMPUTERS; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SMOKING CESSATION; TEXT MESSAGING; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84897432305     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3016     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Liu Z, Verplanken B, Orbell S. Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation 2005 Jun;61(6):700-712. [doi: 10.1108/00220410510632040]
2. Nagelhout GE, de Korte-de Boer D, Kunst AE, van der Meer RM, de Vries H, van Gelder BM, et al. Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking prevalence, consumption, initiation, and cessation between 2001 and 2008 in the Netherlands. Findings from a national population survey. BMC Public Health 2012;12:303 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-303] [Medline: 22537139]
3. Hiscock R, Judge K, Bauld L. Social inequalities in quitting smoking: what factors mediate the relationship between socioeconomic position and smoking cessation? J Public Health (Oxf) 2011 Mar;33(1):39-47 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq097] [Medline: 21178184]
4. Kotz D, West R. Explaining the social gradient in smoking cessation: it's not in the trying, but in the succeeding. Tob Control 2009 Feb;18(1):43-46 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.025981] [Medline: 18936053]
5. Civljak M, Stead LF, Hartmann-Boyce J, Sheikh A, Car J. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;7:CD007078. [doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007078.pub4] [Medline: 23839868]
6. Te Poel F, Bolman C, Reubsaet A, de Vries H. Efficacy of a single computer-tailored e-mail for smoking cessation: results after 6 months. Health Educ Res 2009 Dec;24(6):930-940 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/her/cyp036] [Medline: 19574405]
7. Elfeddali I, Bolman C, Candel MJ, Wiers RW, de Vries H. Preventing smoking relapse via Web-based computer-tailored feedback: A randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(4):e109 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2057] [Medline: 22903145]
8. de Vries H, Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns 1999 Feb;36(2):99-105. [Medline: 10223015]
9. Dijkstra A. Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation. Health Educ Res 2005 Oct;20(5):527-539 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/her/cyh014] [Medline: 15701665]
10. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav 2003;27 Suppl 3:S227-S232. [Medline: 14672383]
11. Spittaels H, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Brug J, Vandelanotte C. Effectiveness of an online computer-tailored physical activity intervention in a real-life setting. Health Educ Res 2007 Jun;22(3):385-396 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/her/cyl096] [Medline: 16971674]
12. Smit ES, de Vries H, Hoving C. Effectiveness of a Web-based multiple tailored smoking cessation program: A randomized controlled trial among Dutch adult smokers. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(3):e82 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1812] [Medline: 22687887]
13. Borland R, Balmford J, Hunt D. The effectiveness of personally tailored computer-generated advice letters for smoking cessation. Addiction 2004 Mar;99(3):369-377. [doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00623.x] [Medline: 14982550]
14. Civljak M, Sheikh A, Stead LF, Car J. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010(9):CD007078. [doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007078.pub3] [Medline: 20824856]
15. Shahab L, McEwen A. Online support for smoking cessation: A systematic review of the literature. Addiction 2009 Nov;104(11):1792-1804. [doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02710.x] [Medline: 19832783]
16. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007 Jul;133(4):673-693. [doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673] [Medline: 17592961]
17. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 2005;7(1):e11 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11] [Medline: 15829473]
18. Brouwer W, Oenema A, Raat H, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK, et al. Characteristics of visitors and revisitors to an Internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention implemented for use by the general public. Health Educ Res 2010 Aug;25(4):585-595 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/her/cyp063] [Medline: 19897515]
19. Bennett GG, Glasgow RE. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: Actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health 2009;30:273-292. [doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235] [Medline: 19296777]
20. Balmford J, Borland R, Benda P, Howard S. Factors associated with use of automated smoking cessation interventions: findings from the eQuit study. Health Educ Res 2013 Apr;28(2):288-299. [doi: 10.1093/her/cys104] [Medline: 23107931]
21. Strecher VJ, McClure J, Alexander G, Chakraborty B, Nair V, Konkel J, et al. The role of engagement in a tailored web-based smoking cessation program: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(5):e36 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1002] [Medline: 18984557]
22. Warren-Findlow J, Prohaska TR, Freedman D. Challenges and opportunities in recruiting and retaining underrepresented populations into health promotion research. Gerontologist 2003 Mar;43 Spec No 1:37-46 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 12637688]
23. Moser DK, Dracup K, Doering LV. Factors differentiating dropouts from completers in a longitudinal, multicenter clinical trial. Nurs Res 2000;49(2):109-116. [Medline: 10768588]
24. Fidler JA, Jarvis MJ, Mindell J, West R. Nicotine intake in cigarette smokers in England: distribution and demographic correlates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008 Dec;17(12):3331-3336 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0296] [Medline: 19064547]
25. Danaher BG, Jazdzewski SA, McKay HG, Hudson CR. Bandwidth constraints to using video and other rich media in behavior change websites. J Med Internet Res 2005;7(4):e49 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.4.e49] [Medline: 16236701]
26. Liu Z. Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation 2005;61(6):700-712 [FREE Full text] [WebCite Cache]
27. Vandelanotte C, Mummery WK. Qualitative and quantitative research into the development and feasibility of a video-tailored physical activity intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011;8(1):70 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-70] [Medline: 21718546]
28. Purcell K. The state of online video. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2010 Jun 03. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/06/03/ the-state-of-online-video/[accessed 2014-02-24] [WebCite Cache ID 6NcuglxgH]
29. Frenn M, Malin S, Brown RL, Greer Y, Fox J, Greer J, et al. Changing the tide: An Internet/video exercise and low-fat diet intervention with middle-school students. Appl Nurs Res 2005 Feb;18(1):13-21. [doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2004.04.003] [Medline: 15812731]
30. Alexander GL, McClure JB, Calvi JH, Divine GW, Stopponi MA, Rolnick SJ, MENU Choices Team. A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption. Am J Public Health 2010 Feb;100(2):319-326 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.154468] [Medline: 20019315]
31. Glasgow RE. eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. Am J Prev Med 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S119-S126. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.023] [Medline: 17466816]
32. Tuong W, Larsen ER, Armstrong AW. Videos to influence: A systematic review of effectiveness of video-based education in modifying health behaviors. J Behav Med 2012 Nov 28. [doi: 10.1007/s10865-012-9480-7] [Medline: 23188480]
33. Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2006 May;61(2):173-190. [doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004] [Medline: 16122896]
34. Campbell MK, Honess-Morreale L, Farrell D, Carbone E, Brasure M. A tailored multimedia nutrition education pilot program for low-income women receiving food assistance. Health Educ Res 1999 Apr;14(2):257-267 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 10387505]
35. Guimarães N, Chambel T, Bidarra J. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning. 2000. From cognitive maps to hypervideo: supporting flexible and rich learner-centered environments URL: http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2000/2/03/[accessed 2013-10-09] [WebCite Cache ID 6KF3uLUTr]
36. Irvine AB, Ary DV, Grove DA, Gilfillan-Morton L. The effectiveness of an interactive multimedia program to influence eating habits. Health Educ Res 2004 Jun;19(3):290-305 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/her/cyg027] [Medline: 15140849]
37. Swartz LH, Noell JW, Schroeder SW, Ary DV. A randomised control study of a fully automated internet based smoking cessation programme. Tob Control 2006 Feb;15(1):7-12 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.006189] [Medline: 16436397]
38. Lancaster T, Stead LF. Self-help interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005(3):CD001118. [doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001118. pub2] [Medline: 16034855]
39. 2010 Amendments to the 2002 "Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct". Am Psychol 2010;65(5):493. [doi: 10.1037/a0020168] [Medline: 20642307]
40. SteunbijStoppen.nl. 2012. URL: http://www.steunbijstoppen.nl/[accessed 2012-10-22] [WebCite Cache ID 6BbakEW1j]
41. de Vries H, Mudde A, Leijs I, Charlton A, Vartiainen E, Buijs G, et al. The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (EFSA): An example of integral prevention. Health Educ Res 2003 Oct;18(5):611-626 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 14572020]
42. de Vries H, Eggers SM, Bolman C. The role of action planning and plan enactment for smoking cessation. BMC Public Health 2013;13:393 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-393] [Medline: 23622256]
43. de Vries H, Kremers SP, Smeets T, Brug J, Eijmael K. The effectiveness of tailored feedback and action plans in an intervention addressing multiple health behaviors. Am J Health Promot 2008;22(6):417-425. [doi: 10.4278/ajhp.22.6.417] [Medline: 18677882]
44. van Osch L, Lechner L, Reubsaet A, Wigger S, de Vries H. Relapse prevention in a national smoking cessation contest: effects of coping planning. Br J Health Psychol 2008 Sep;13(Pt 3):525-535. [doi: 10.1348/135910707X224504] [Medline: 17631695]
45. Elfeddali I, Bolman C, Candel MJ, Wiers RW, De Vries H. The role of self-efficacy, recovery self-efficacy, and preparatory planning in predicting short-term smoking relapse. Br J Health Psychol 2012 Feb;17(1):185-201. [doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02032.x] [Medline: 22107073]
46. Fagerström K. Determinants of tobacco use and renaming the FTND to the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence. Nicotine Tob Res 2012 Jan;14(1):75-78. [doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr137] [Medline: 22025545]
47. Verplanken B, Orbell S. Reflections on past behavior. A self-report index of habit strength. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2003;33:1313-1330. [doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01951.x]
48. Cole JC, Rabin AS, Smith TL, Kaufman AS. Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES-D short form. Psychol Assess 2004 Dec;16(4):360-372. [doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.4.360] [Medline: 15584795]
49. Mudde AN, Willemsen MC, Kremers S, De Vries H. Meetinstrumenten voor onderzoek naar roken en stoppen met roken [Measurements from Studies about Smoking and Smoking Cessation]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Stivoro; 2006.
50. Hughes JR, Keely J, Naud S. Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers. Addiction 2004 Jan;99(1):29-38. [Medline: 14678060]
51. Heritier SR, Gebski VJ, Keech AC. Inclusion of patients in clinical trial analysis: The intention-to-treat principle. Med J Aust 2003 Oct 20;179(8):438-440. [Medline: 14558871]
52. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):670-674 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 10480822]
53. Schafer JL. Multiple imputation: A primer. Stat Methods Med Res 1999 Mar;8(1):3-15. [Medline: 10347857]
54. Bodner TE. What improves with increased missing data imputations? Structural Equation Modeling. A Multidisciplinary Journal 2008;14(4):651-675. [doi: 10.1080/10705510802339072]
55. Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS, Snow MG. Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. Psychol Bull 1992 Jan;111(1):23-41. [Medline: 1539088]
56. West R, Sohal T. "Catastrophic" pathways to smoking cessation: findings from national survey. BMJ 2006 Feb 25;332(7539):458-460 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/bmj.38723.573866.AE] [Medline: 16443610]
57. Eysenbach G, CONSORT-EHEALTH Group. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(4):e126 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923] [Medline: 22209829]