Metabolic efficiency underpins performance trade-offs in growth of Arabidopsis thaliana

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Kleessen, Sabrina ^a   Laitinen, Roosa ^a   Fusari, Corina M ^a,b   Antonio, Carla ^a,c   Sulpice, Ronan ^a,d   Fernie, Alisdair R ^a   Stitt, Mark ^a   Nikoloski, Zoran ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PLANT PHYSIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGÍA AGROPECUARIA   (Argentina)

^c INSTITUTO DE TECNOLOGIA QUÍMICA E BIOLÓGICA   (Portugal)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; NITROGEN;

DATA SET; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GROWTH RATE; HERB; METABOLISM; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROTEIN; TRADE-OFF;

ABIOTIC STRESS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FRESH WEIGHT; GENETIC DISTANCE; GROWTH RATE; MATHEMATICAL AND STATISTICAL PROCEDURES; METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; PARETO PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PLANT GROWTH; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRODUCTIVITY; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; ROSETTE FORMATION; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; BIOMASS; CARBON; NITROGEN;

EID: 84897424400     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4537     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Nicotra, A. B. et al. Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 684-692 (2010
2. West-Eberhard, M. J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution (Oxford University Press, 2003
3. Roff, D. A. Evolution Of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis (Chapman & Hall, 1992
4. Messina, F., Durham, S., Richards, J. & McArthur, D. Trade-off between plant growth and defense? A comparison of sagebrush populations. Oecologia 131, 43-51 (2002 (Pubitemid 36059194)
5. Obeso, J. R. The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytol. 155, 321-348 (2002 (Pubitemid 34923128)
6. Koenig, W. D. & Knops, J. M. H. Scale of mast-seeding and tree-ring growth. Nature 396, 225-226 (1998
7. Marty, F. Plant vacuoles. Plant Cell 11, 587-600 (1999
8. Alberts, B. et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell 840-855 (Garland Science, 2007
9. Enquist, B. J. & Niklas, K. J. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science 295, 1517-1520 (2002 (Pubitemid 34174005)
10. Pyl, E.-T. et al. Metabolism and growth in Arabidopsis depend on the daytime temperature but are temperature-compensated against cool nights. Plant Cell 24, 2443-2469 (2012
11. Poorter, H. et al. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol. 193, 30-50 (2012
12. Buchanan, B., Gruissem, W. & Jones, R. Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of Plants (Wiley, 2002
13. Xu, G., Fan, X. & Miller, A. J. Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 153-182 (2012
14. Hirel, B., Le Gouis, J., Ney, B. & Gallais, A. The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 2369-2387 (2007 (Pubitemid 47216545)
15. Roff, D. A. Trade-offs between growth and reproduction: an analysis of the quantitative genetic evidence. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 434-445 (2000 (Pubitemid 30300911)
16. Shoval, O. et al. Evolutionary trade-offs, pareto optimality, and the geometry of phenotype space. Science 336, 1157-1160 (2012
17. Oster, G. F. & Wilson, E. O. Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects 372 (Princeton University Press, 1978
18. Farnsworth, K. D. & Niklas, K. J. Theories of optimization, form and function in branching architecture in plants. Funct. Ecol. 9, 355-363 (1995
19. El Samad, H., Khammash, M., Homescu, C. & Petzold, L. Optimal performance of the heat-shock gene regulatory network. in World Congr. 16, 2206 (2005
20. Kennedy, M. C. Functional-structural models optimize the placement of foliage units for multiple whole-canopy functions. Ecol. Res. 25, 723-732 (2009
21. Steuer, R. E. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application (Wiley, 1986
22. Miettinen, K. M. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization (International Series in Operations Research and Management Science) (Kluwer Academic, 1999
23. Rowley, C. K. & Schneider, F. The Encyclopedia of Public Choice (Springer, 2003
24. Noor, E. & Milo, R. Efficiency in evolutionary trade-offs. Science 336, 1114-1115 (2012
25. Sheftel, H., Shoval, O., Mayo, A. & Alon, U. The geometry of the Pareto front in biological phenotype space. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1471-1483 (2013
26. Szekely, P., Sheftel, H., Mayo, A. & Alon, U. Evolutionary tradeoffs between economy and effectiveness in biological homeostasis systems. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003163 (2013
27. Schuetz, R., Zamboni, N., Zampieri, M., Heinemann, M. & Sauer, U. Multidimensional optimality of microbial metabolism. Science 336, 601-604 (2012
28. Schuetz, R., Kuepfer, L. & Sauer, U. Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 119 (2007
29. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. & Zhu, J. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis 164, 1-39 (Springer (2011
30. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. & Tone, K. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software 490 (Springer, 2007
31. Niklas, K. J. & Enquist, B. J. On the vegetative biomass partitioning of seed plant leaves, stems, and roots. Am. Nat. 159, 482-497 (2002 (Pubitemid 34443779)
32. Atwell, B. B. J., Kriedemann, P. E. & Turnbull, C. G. N. In Plants in Action: Adaptation in Nature, Performance in Cultivation (MacMillan Education, 1999
33. Sulpice, R. et al. Starch as a major integrator in the regulation of plant growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10348-10353 (2009
34. Sulpice, R. et al. Network analysis of enzyme activities and metabolite levels and their relationship to biomass in a large panel of Arabidopsis accessions. Plant Cell 22, 2872-2893 (2010
35. Weigel, D. Natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana: from molecular genetics to ecological genomics. Plant Physiol. 158, 2-22 (2011
36. Koornneef, M., Alonso-Blanco, C. & Vreugdenhil, D. Naturally occurring genetic variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 141-172 (2004 (Pubitemid 38940929)
37. Gibon, Y. et al. Adjustment of growth, starch turnover, protein content and central metabolism to a decrease of the carbon supply when Arabidopsis is grown in very short photoperiods. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 859-874 (2009
38. Tschoep, H. et al. Adjustment of growth and central metabolism to a mild but sustained nitrogen-limitation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 300-318 (2009
39. Niinemets, U. et al. Do we underestimate the importance of leaf size in plant economics? Disproportional scaling of support costs within the spectrum of leaf physiognomy. Ann. Bot. 100, 283-303 (2007 (Pubitemid 47229670)
40. Mickelson, S. Mapping of QTL associated with nitrogen storage and remobilization in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 801-812 (2003 (Pubitemid 36189225)
41. Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J. & Barabasi, A.-L. Observability of complex systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 110, 2460-2465 (2013
42. Meyer, R. C. et al. The metabolic signature related to high plant growth rate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 104, 4759-4764 (2007 (Pubitemid 47186298)
43. Schauer, N. et al. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 447-454 (2006
44. Riedelsheimer, C. et al. Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nat. Genet. 44, 217-220 (2012
45. Hirayama, T. & Shinozaki, K. Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post-genome era: past, present and future. Plant J. 61, 1041-1052 (2010
46. Andersen, P. & Petersen, N. C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 39, 1261-1264 (1993
47. Lovell, C. A. K. & Rouse, A. P. B. Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 54, 101-108 (2003
48. Adler, N. & Golany, B. Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132, 260-273 (2001 (Pubitemid 32385019)
49. Adler, N. & Golany, B. Including principal component weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53, 985-991 (2002 (Pubitemid 34964224)
50. Kleessen, S., Fernie, A. R. & Nikoloski, Z. A computational framework for evaluating the efficiency of Arabidopsis accessions in response to nitrogen stress reveals important metabolic mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 3, 217 (2012
51. Araujo, W. L. et al. Identification of the 2-hydroxyglutarate and isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenases as alternative electron donors linking lysine catabolism to the electron transport chain of Arabidopsis mitochondria. Plant Cell 22, 1549-1563 (2010
52. Scheible, W.-R. et al. Genome-wide reprogramming of primary and secondary metabolism, protein synthesis, cellular growth processes, and the regulatory infrastructure of Arabidopsis in response to nitrogen. Plant Physiol. 136, 2483-2499 (2004 (Pubitemid 41071292)
53. Atwell, S. et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 465, 627-631 (2010
54. Komeda, Y. Genetic regulation of time to flower in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 521-535 (2004 (Pubitemid 38940942)
55. Wahl, V. et al. Regulation of flowering by trehalose-6-phosphate signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 339, 704-707 (2013
56. Yang, L., Xu, M., Koo, Y., He, J. & Poethig, R. S. Sugar promotes vegetative phase change in Arabidopsis thaliana by repressing the expression of MIR156A and MIR156C. Elife 2, e00260-e00260 (2013
57. Yu, S. et al. Sugar is an endogenous cue for juvenile-to-adult phase transition in plants. Elife 2, e00269-e00269 (2013
58. Horton, M. W. et al. Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation in worldwide Arabidopsis thaliana accessions from the RegMap panel. Nat. Genet. 44, 212-216 (2012
59. Felsenstein, J. PHYLIP-Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2) Cladistics 5, 164-166 (1989
60. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2, 429-444 (1978 (Pubitemid 9402758)
61. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. Programming with linear fractional functionals. Nav. Res. Logist. Q 9, 181-186 (1962
62. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30, 1078-1092 (1984 (Pubitemid 14651320)
63. Abdi, H. & Williams, L. J. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2, 433-459 (2010
64. Adler, N. & Yazhemsky, E. Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: PCA-DEA or variable reduction. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202, 273-284 (2010
65. Adler, N., Friedman, L. & Sinuany-Stern, Z. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140, 249-265 (2002 (Pubitemid 34435032)
66. Seiford, L.M. & Zhu, J. Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFOR J. 37, 174-187 (1999
67. Dula, J. H. & Hickman, B. L. Effects of excluding the column being scored from the DEA envelopment LP technology matrix. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 48, 1001-1012 (1997 (Pubitemid 127599434)
68. Abdi, H. In Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. (ed. Salkind, N. J.) 508-510 (Thousand Oaks, 2007
69. Stekhoven, D. J. & Bühlmann, P. MissForest-non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28, 112-118 (2012)