Daylighting in an atrium-type high performance house

Building and Environment

Volumn 76, Issue , 2014, Pages 92-104

  Berardi, Umberto ^a   Wang, Taoning ^b  

^a Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

^b WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Atrium house; Blind movement; Daylight simulation; High performance house; Occupant behavior; Solar energy

Indexed keywords

DAYLIGHT SIMULATION; DAYLIGHTING; DESIGN; GLARE; GLASS; SOLAR ENERGY;

BLIND MOVEMENT; BUILDING ENVELOPES; DAYLIGHT AUTONOMIES; DAYLIGHT GLARE PROBABILITIES; LIGHTING STRATEGIES; OCCUPANT BEHAVIOR; RESIDENTIAL BUILDING; THERMAL PERFORMANCE;

HOUSES;

BUILDING; LIGHT; PROBABILITY; SIMULATION; SOLAR POWER;

CHINA; DATONG; MASSACHUSETTS; SHANXI; UNITED STATES; WORCESTER [MASSACHUSETTS];

EID: 84897411900     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Solar Decathlon China rules 2012, Available at:. http://www.sdchina.org/download/Revised_SDC2013_Rules_V2.0.pdf.
2. Berardi U. Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: rating systems and rated buildings. Sustain Dev 2012, 20(6):411-424.
3. GhaffarianHoseini A., Dahlan N., Berardi U., GhaffarianHoseini A., Makaremi N. Sustainable energy performances of green buildings: a review of current theories, implementations and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013, 25:1-17.
4. Sharples S., Lash D. Daylight in atrium buildings: a critical review. Archit Sci Rev 2012, 50(4):301-312.
5. Yoon Y.J., Moeck M. Two studies that investigate the impact of ceiling and wall reflectance values on LEED credits. JArchit Eng 2005, 11(3):81-90.
6. Calcagni B., Paroncini M. Daylight factor prediction in atria building designs. Sol Energy 2004, 76(6):669-682.
7. Samant S. Acritical review of articles published on atrium geometry and surface reflectances on daylighting in an atrium and its adjoining spaces. Archit Sci Rev 2010, 53(2):145-156.
8. Kim G., Kim J.T. Healthy-daylighting design for the living environment in apartments in Korea. Build Environ 2010, 45:287-294.
9. Todorovic M.S., Kim J.T. Beyond the science and art of the healthy buildings daylighting dynamic control's performance prediction and validation. Energy Build 2012, 46:159-166.
10. Leslie R.P. Capturing the daylight dividend in buildings: why and how?. Build Environ 2002, 38(2):381-385.
11. Andersen M., Gochenour S.J., Lockley S.W. Modelling 'non-visual' effects ofdaylighting in a residential environment. Build Environ 2013, 70:138-149.
12. Wang N., Esram T., Martinez L.A., McCulley M.T. Amarketable all-electric solar house: a report of a Solar Decathlon project. Renew Energy 2009, 34(12):2860-2871.
13. Cerón I., Neila J., Khayet M. Experimental tile with phase change materials (PCM) for building use. Energy Build 2011, 43:1869-1874.
14. Rodriguez-Ubinas E., Ruiz-Valero L., Vega S., Neila J. Applications of Phase Change Material in highly energy-efficient houses. Energy Build 2012, 50:49-62.
15. Laouadi A., Reinhart C.F., Bourgeois D. Efficient calculation of daylight coefficients for rooms with dissimilar complex fenestration systems. JBuild Perform Simul 2008, 1(1):3-15.
16. Ochoa C.E., Aries M.B.C., Hensen J.L.M. State of the art in lighting simulation for building science: a literature review. JBuild Perform Simul 2012, 5(4):209-233.
17. Ward G., Rubinstein F. Anew technique for computer simulation of illuminated spaces. JIllum Eng Soc 1988, 1:80-91.
18. Mardaljevic J. Sky model blends for predicting internal illuminance: a comparison founded on the BRE-IDMP dataset. JBuild Perform Simul 2008, 1(3):163-173.
19. Jakubiec A.J., Reinhart C.F. DIVA 2.0: integration daylight and thermal simulations using Rhinoceros 3D, DAYSIM and EnergyPlus. Proc. of building simulation 2011, Sydney 2012.
20. Reinhart C.F., Wienold J. The daylighting dashboard - a simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces. Build Environ 2011, 46:386-396.
21. Jakubiec J.A., Reinhart C.F. Fire performance of a fiber reinforced polymer wall panel in a single family dwelling. Light Res Technol 2012, 44:149-170.
22. Perez R., Seals R., Michalsky J. All weather model for sky luminance distribution-preliminary configuration and validation. Sol Energy 1993, 50(3):235-245.
23. Ward G., Mistrick R., Lee E.S., McNeil A., Jonsson J. Simulating the daylight performance of complex fenestration systems using bidirectional scattering distribution functions within radiance. LEUKOS 2011, 7(4):241-261.
24. Tregenza P.R., Waters I.M. Daylight coefficients. Light Res Technol 1983, 15(2):65-71.
25. Reinhart C.F. Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design 2006, Report of the National Research Council Canada - Institute for Research in Construction.
26. Wienold J. Dynamic daylight glare evaluation. Proc. of building simulation 2009, Glasgow, UK 2009.
27. Berardi U., Dembsey N., Meacham B., You Y.G. Alternative fire test for the approval of a fiber reinforced polymer panel. Fire Technol 2014, in press.
28. Reinhart C.F., Walkenhorst O. Dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a full-scale test office with outer venetian blinds. Energy Build 2001, 33(7):683-697.
29. Reinhardt C.F., Weissman D.A. The daylit area-correlating architectural student assessments with current and emerging daylight availability metrics. Build Environ 2012, 50:155-164.
30. IESNA, Illuminating Engineering Society of North America IESNA lighting handbook 2000, New York, NY. 9th ed.
31. Reinhart C.F. Asimulation-based review of the ubiquitous window-head-height to day-lit zone depth rule of thumb. Proc. of building simulation 2005, Montreal, Canada 2005.
32. Nabil A., Mardeljevic J. Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm to access daylight in buildings. Light Res Technol 2005, 37(1):41-59.
33. Wienold J., Christoffersen J. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction method for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy Build 2006, 38(7):743-757.
34. Wienold J. Evalglare: a new RADIANCE-based tool to evaluate glare in office spaces. Proc. of the 3rd international radiance workshop, Fribourg, CH 2004.
35. Suk J., Schiler M. Investigation of Evalglare software, daylight glare probability and high dynamic range imaging for daylight glare analysis. Light Res Technol 2013, 45(4):450-463.
36. Cantin F., Dubois M. Daylighting metrics based on illuminance, distribution, glare and directivity. Light Res Technol 2011, 43:291-307.
37. Tzempelikos A. Development and implementation of lighting and shading control algorithms in an airport building. JArchit Eng 2012, 18(3):242-250.
38. Lee E.S., Clear R.D., Fernandes L.L., Kiliccote S., Piette M.A., Rubinstein F.M., et al. Daylighting the New York Times headquarters building: commissioning daylighting systems and estimation of demand response 2007, Report to the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
39. Nikoofard S., Ismet Ugursal V., Beausoleil-Morrison I. Effect of external shading on household energy requirement for heating and cooling in Canada. Energy Build 2011, 43:1627-1635.
40. Olbina S., Hu J. Daylighting and thermal performance of automated split-controlled blinds. Build Environ 2012, 56:127-138.
41. Shehabi A., DeForest N., McNeil A., Masanet E., Greenblatt J., Lee E., et al. U.S. energy savings potential from dynamic daylighting control glazings. Energy Build 2013, 66:415-423.
42. Inkarojrit V. Monitoring and modelling of manually-controlled Venetian blinds in private offices: a pilot study. JBuild Perform Simul 2008, 1(2):75-89.
43. Bourgeois D., Reinhart C.F., Macdonald I. Adding advanced behavioural models in whole building energy simulation: a study on the total energy impact of manual and automated lighting control. Energy Build 2006, 38(7):814-823.
44. Daum D., Morel N. Identifying important state variables for a blind controller. Build Environ 2010, 45:887-900.
45. Gunay H.B., O'Brien W., Beausoleil-Morrison I. Acritical review of observation studies, modeling, and simulation of adaptive occupant behaviors in offices. Build Environ 2013, 70:31-47.
46. Yun G.Y., Steemers K. Time-dependent occupant behaviour models of window control in summer. Build Environ 2008, 43(9):1471-1482.
47. Herkel S., Knapp U., Pfafferott J. Towards a model of user behaviour regarding the manual control of windows in office buildings. Build Environ 2008, 43(4):588-600.
48. Van Den Wymelenberg K. Patterns of occupant interaction with window blinds: a literature review. Energy Build 2012, 51:165-176.
49. Andersen R.V., Fabi V., Toftum J., Corgnati S.P., Olesen B.W. Window opening behaviour modelled from measurements in Danish dwellings. Build Environ 2013, 69:101-113.
50. Schweiker M., Haldi F., Shukuya M., Robinson D. Verification of stochastic models of window opening behaviour for residential buildings. JBuild Perform Simul 2012, 5(1):55-74.
51. Fabi V., Andersen R.V., Corgnati S.P., Olesen B.W. Amethodology for modelling energy-related human behaviour: application to window opening behaviour in residential buildings. Build Simul 2013, 6:415-427.
52. Hoes P., Hensen J.L.M., Loomans M.G.L.C., De Vries B., Bourgeois D. User behavior in whole building simulation. Energy Build 2009, 41:295-302.
53. Tzempelikos A., Shen H. Comparative control strategies for roller shades with respect to daylighting and energy performance. Build Environ 2013, 67:179-192.