The 'adaptive zone'-A concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces

Lighting Research and Technology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 149-170

  Jakubiec, J A ^a   Reinhart, C F ^a  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF DESIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLARE EFFECTS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COMFORTABLE SPACE; DAYLIGHT AVAILABILITY; DAYLIGHT GLARE PROBABILITIES; DISCOMFORT GLARE; GLARE INDICES; VENETIAN BLIND; VIEW DIRECTIONS; VISUAL COMFORT;

GLARE;

EID: 84861823702     PISSN: 14771535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1477153511420097     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rangi K, Osterhaus W.. Windowless environments: Are they affecting our health?: Proceedings of LIGHTING'99-Then, Now & Beyond, 44th Annual Convention of the Illuminating Engineering Society of Australia and New Zealand ; 1999 Adelaide, Australia ; 1999. 4:9:1.
2. Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z. Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. Leukos. 2006 ; 3: 1-25
3. Discomfort Glare in Interior Lighting. CIE Publication 117. Vienna: CIE ; 1995 :
4. Hopkinson R. Glare from daylighting in buildings. Applied Ergonomics. 1972 ; 3: 206-215
5. Tuaycharoen N, Tregenza PR. View and discomfort glare from windows. Lighting Research and Technology. 2007 ; 39: 185-200
6. USGBC. LEED 2009 for new construction and major renovations rating system. US Green Building Council. Retrieved 2 November 2010, from http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID7244.
7. Reinhart C, Breton P. Experimental validation of Autodesk® 3ds Max® Design 2009 and Daysim 3.0. Leukos. 2009 ; 6: 1-1
8. Larson GW, Shakespeare R Rendering with Radiance: The Art and Science of Lighting Visualization. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers ; 1998:
9. Luckiesh M, Guth SK. Brightness in visual field at borderline between comfort and discomfort (BCD). Illuminating Engineering. 1949 ; 44: 650-670
10. Nazzal A. A new daylight glare evaluation method: Introduction of the monitoring protocol and calculation method. Energy and Buildings. 2001 ; 33: 257-265 (Pubitemid 32029334)
11. Nazzal A, Onaygil S. Güler O. Subjective experience of discomfort glare in a daylit computerized office in Istanbul and its mathematical prediction with the DGIN method. The Bulletin of the Istanbul Technical University, Interdisciplinary Journal of Physical and Engineering Science. 2005 ; 54: 96-107 (Pubitemid 44254269)
12. Einhorn H. Discomfort glare: A formula to bridge differences. Lighting Research and Technology. 1979 ; 11: 90-94
13. Harrold R IESNA Lighting Ready Reference: A Compendium of Materials from the IESNA. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America ; 2003:
14. Wienold J, Christoffersen J. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy and Buildings. 2006 ; 38: 743-757 (Pubitemid 43669109)
15. WienoldJ. Evalglare version 0.9f. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems. Freiburg, Germany. Retrieved 2 March 2010, from www.ise.fraunhofer.de/ radiance.
16. Spatial Distribution of Daylight - CIE Standard Overcast Sky and Clear Sky. Vienna: CIE Publication S003 ; 1996:
17. Ochoa CE, Capeluto IG. Evaluating visual comfort and performance of three natural lighting systems for deep office buildings in highly luminous climates. Building and Environment. 2006 ; 41: 1128-1135 (Pubitemid 43380503)
18. Reinhart CF, Walkenhorst O. Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy and Buildings. 2001 ; 33: 683-697 (Pubitemid 32715980)
19. Walkenhorst O, Luther J, Reinhart CF, Timmer J. Dynamic annual daylight simulations based on one-hour and one-minute means of irradiance data. Solar Energy. 2002 ; 72: 385-395 (Pubitemid 34724916)
20. Wienold J.. Proceedings of Building Simulation - Eleventh International IBPSA Conference ; 2009 Glasgow, Scotland ; 2009. 944.
21. Reinhart CF. Lightswitch-2002: A model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Solar Energy. 2004 ; 77: 15-28 (Pubitemid 38687735)
22. Wienold J Dynamic simulation of blind control strategies for visual comfort and energy balance analysis. 2007: 1197-1204.
23. Rubin AI, Collins BL, Tibbott RL Window Blinds as a Potential Energy Saver: A Case Study. NBS Building Science Series 112. Washington, USA: National Bureau of Standards ; 1978:
24. Lindsay CRT, Littlefair PJ Occupant Use of Venetian Blinds in Offices. Watford, UK: Building Research Establishment ; 1993, PD 233/92:
25. Bodart M, De Herde A. Global energy savings in office buildings by the use of daylight. Energy and Buildings. 2002 ; 34: 421-429 (Pubitemid 34105451)
26. Reinhart CF, Wienold J. The daylighting dashboard-a simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces. Building and Environment. 2011 ; 46: 386-396
27. ReinhartCF, DAYSIM version 3.1b. Retrieved 2 November 2010, from http://daysim.com/download.html.
28. Inanici M, Galvin J. Evaluation of high dynamic range photography as a luminance data acquisition system. Lighting Research and Technology. 2006 ; 38: 123-134