Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Pereira Cenci, Tatiana ^a   Cenci, Maximiliano S ^a   Fedorowicz, Zbys ^b   Azevedo, Marina ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^b Bahrain Branch   (Bahrain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; RESIN;

DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOOTH FILLING; DENTAL SURGERY;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS;

EID: 84897368244     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007819.pub3     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Clinical performance of novel resin composites in posterior teeth:18-month results. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2007;9(2):209-16.
2. Ohta Y. Antibacterial activity of plastic restorative materials. Shikwa Gakuho. Dental Science Reports 1984;84(1):83-8.
3. Saku S, Kotake H, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Ohashi S, Hotta M, Horiuchi S, et al.Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles. Dental Materials Journal 2010;29(2):193-8. [PUBMED: 20379030]
4. Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clinical Oral Investigations 2003;7(2):63-70.
5. Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, van der Mei HC. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. Journal of Dental Research 2010;89(7):657-65. [DOI: ]
6. Chen L, Shen H, Suh BI. Antibacterial dental restorative materials: a state-of-the-art review. American Journal of Dentistry 2012;25(6):337-46. [PUBMED: 23409624]
7. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dental Materials 2012;28(1):87-101. [DOI: ]
8. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315(7109):629-34.
9. Hannig M, Hannig C. Nanotechnology and its role in caries therapy. Advances in Dental Research 2012;24(2):53-7. [DOI: ]
10. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, et al.Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clinical Oral Investigations 2007;11(1):5-33.
11. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al.FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clinical Oral Investigations 2010;14(4):349-66. [DOI: ]
12. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557-60.
13. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
14. Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dental Materials 2003;19(6):449-57.
15. Kidd EA, Fejerskov O. What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenic biofilms. Journal of Dental Research 2004;83 Spec No C:C35-8.
16. Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community - implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health 2006;6 Suppl 1:S14.
17. Mjör IA. Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries. Journal of the American Dental Association 2005;136(10):1426-33.
18. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dental Materials 2007;23(1):2-8.
19. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
20. Rolland SL, McCabe JF, Imazato S, Walls AWG. A randomised trial comparing the antibacterial effect of dentine primers against bacteria in natural root caries. Caries Research 2011;45:574-80. [DOI: ]
21. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Association 1995;273(5):408-12.
22. Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet 2007;369(9555):51-9.
23. Thomas RZ, Ruben JL, ten Bosch JJ, Fidler V, Huysmans MC. Approximal secondary caries lesion progression, a 20-week in situ study. Caries Research 2007;41(5):399-405.
24. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials--fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dental Materials 2007;23(3):343-62.
25. Zhang K, Cheng L, Imazato S, Antonucci JM, Lin NJ, Lin-Gibson S, et al.Effects of dual antibacterial agents MDPB and nano-silver in primer on microcosm biofilm, citotoxicity and dentine bond properties. Journal of Dentistry 2013;41(5):464-74. [DOI: ]
26. Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS, Fedorowicz Z, Marchesan MA. Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: ]
27. Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci M, Fedorowicz Z, Marchesan M. Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. [DOI: ]