The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic profile of first 88,897 approaches provides recommendations for population screening

Cancer Prevention Research

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 362-371

  McRonald, Fiona E ^a   Yadegarfar, Ghasem ^a   Baldwin, David R ^c   Devaraj, Anand ^d   Brain, Kate E ⁱ   Eisen, Tim ^j   Holemans, John A ^b   Ledson, Martin ^b   Screaton, Nicholas ^k   Rintoul, Robert C ^k   Hands, Christopher J ^a   Lifford, Kate ⁱ   Whynes, David ^c   Kerr, Keith M ^l   Page, Richard ^b   Parmar, Mahesh ^e   Wald, Nicholas ^f   Weller, David ^m   Williamson, Paula R ^a   Myles, Jonathan ^h   Hansell, David M ^g   Duffy, Stephen W ^h   Field, John K ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b LIVERPOOL HEART AND CHEST HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^f QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^g ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ CARDIFF UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^k PAPWORTH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^l ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^m UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SMOKING; SOCIAL STATUS; TREATMENT RESPONSE; UNITED KINGDOM; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MASS SCREENING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SOCIAL CLASS; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; SOCIAL CLASS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84897139738     PISSN: 19406207     EISSN: 19406215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0206     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. CRUK. Cancer Stats [database on the Internet]. London: Cancer Research UK; 2012. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/ cancerstats/reports/. Accessed May 2013.
2. NCRI, editor. Lung cancer UK price tag eclipses the cost of any other cancer. London: Cancer Research UK; 2012. Available from: http://www. cancerresearchuk.org/about-us/cancer-news/pressrelease/lung-cancer-uk-price-tag- eclipses-the-cost-of-any-othercancer.
3. Field JK, Duffy SW. Lung cancer screening: the way forward. Br J Cancer 2008;99:557-62.
4. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team,Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365:395-409.
5. Kramer BS, Berg CD, Aberle DR, Prorok PC. Lung cancer screening with low-dose helical CT: results from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). J Med Screen 2011;18:109-11.
6. Ru Zhao Y, Xie X, de Koning HJ, Mali WP, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M. NELSON lung cancer screening study. Cancer Imaging 2011;11 Spec No A:S79-84.
7. Cassidy A, Myles JP, Liloglou T, Duffy SW, Field JK. Defining high-risk individuals in a population-based molecular-epidemiological study of lung cancer. Int J Oncol 2006;28:1295-301.
8. Cassidy A, Myles JP, van Tongeren M, Page RD, Liloglou T, Duffy SW, et al. The LLP risk model: an individual risk prediction model for lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2008;98:270-6. (Pubitemid 351161249)
9. Raji OY, Duffy SW, Agbaje OF, Baker SG, Christiani DC, Cassidy A, et al. Predictive accuracy of the liverpool lung project risk model for stratifying patients for computed tomography screening for lung cancer a case-control and cohort validation study. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:242-50.
10. Baldwin DR, Duffy SW, Wald NJ, Page R, Hansell DM, Field JK., et al. UK Lung Screen (UKLS) nodule management protocol: modelling of a single screen randomised controlled trial of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer. Thorax 2011;66:308-13.
11. van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M, Scholten ET, Nackaerts K, Vernhout R, et al. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2221-9.
12. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, Wooldrage K, Hart AR, Northover JM, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375:1624-33.
13. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TM, Scott RA, et al. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360:1531-9. (Pubitemid 35356366)
14. Jakes RW, Duffy SW, Ng FC, Gao F, Ng EH. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer at and after a prevalence screen in Singaporean women. Int J Epidemiol 2000;29:11-9. (Pubitemid 30119702)
15. UKLS. Available from: http://www.ukls.org. Accessed May 2013.
16. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361-70. (Pubitemid 13098606)
17. Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C, Balshem A, Lustbader E, Heggan T, et al. Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:1074-80. (Pubitemid 23199189)
18. Watson M, Lloyd S, Davidson J, Meyer L, Eeles R, Ebbs S, et al.The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1999;79:868-74. (Pubitemid 29082119)
19. Field J, HTA protocol. Available from: http://www.hta.ac.uk/project/2382. asp.
20. DCLG. English indices of deprivation 2010. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2010.
21. Robinson SH, Smoking and drinking among adults, 2009: a report on the 2009 General Lifestyle Survey. London: Office for National Statistics; 2009.
22. ESDS; UK Data Service. Health survey for England, 2010. Essex: Economic and Social Data Service; 2010.
23. Bach PB, Kattan MW, Thornquist MD, Kris MG, Tate RC, Barnett MJ, et al. Variations in lung cancer risk among smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:470-8. (Pubitemid 36432421)
24. Spitz MR, Etzel CJ, Dong Q, Amos CI, Wei Q, Wu X, et al. An expanded risk prediction model for lung cancer. Cancer Prev Res 2008;1:250-4.
25. Tammemagi MC, Katki HA, Hocking WG, Church TR, Caporaso N, Kvale PA, et al. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2013;368:728-36.
26. Kovalchik SA, Tammemagi M, Berg CD, Caporaso NE, Riley TL, Korch M, et al. Targeting of low-dose CT screening according to the risk of lung-cancer death. N Engl J Med 2013;369:245-54.
27. Wardle J, Sutton S,Williamson S, Taylor T, McCaffery K, Cuzick J, et al. Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening. Prev Med 2000;31:323-34.
28. Espinosa de Los Monteros K, Gallo LC. The relevance of fatalism in the study of Latinas' cancer screening behavior: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Behav Med 2011;18:310-8.
29. Miles A, Rainbow S, vonWagner C. Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:2132-40.