Differences in anticipated interaction drive own group biases in face memory

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Wilson, John Paul ^a   See, Pirita E ^b   Bernstein, Michael J ^c   Hugenberg, Kurt ^b   Chartier, Christopher ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d ASHLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPECTATION; FACE; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERGROUP BIAS; MALE; MEMORY BIAS; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); FACE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MEMORY;

EID: 84897129212     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090668     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allport G (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
2. Malpass RS, Kravitz J (1969). Recognition for faces of own and other race. J Pers Soc Psychol 13: 330-334.
3. Meissner CA, Brigham JC (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Public Policy Law 7: 3-35. (Pubitemid 33656932)
4. Rodin MJ (1987). Who is memorable to whom: A study of cognitive disregard. Soc Cogn 5: 144-165.
5. Cross JF, Cross J, Daly J (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Percept Psychophys 10: 393-396.
6. Rule NO, Ambady N, Adams RB, Macrae CN (2007). Us and them: Memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups. Psychon Bull Rev 14: 687-692.
7. Bernstein MJ, Young SG, Hugenberg K (2007). The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychol Sci 18: 706-712.
8. Hehman E, Mania EW, Gaertner SL (2010). Where the division lies: Common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race facial recognition effect. J Exp Soc Psychol 46: 445-448.
9. Van Bavel JJ, Packer DJ, Cunningham WA (2011). Modulation of the fusiform face area following minimal exposure to motivationally relevant faces: Evidence of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard). J Cogn Neurosci 23: 3343-3354.
10. Hugenberg K, Wilson JP, See PE, Young SG (in press). Toward a synthetic model of own group biases in face memory. Vis Cogn.
11. Hugenberg K, Young SG, Bernstein MJ, Sacco DF (2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the cross race recognition deficit. Psychol Rev 117: 1168-1187.
12. Correll J, Park B (2005). A model of the ingroup as a resource. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 9: 341-359.
13. Macrae CN, Quadflieg S (2010). Perceiving people. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, editors. The handbook of social psychology (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Brewer MB (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In: Srull TK, Wyer RS, editors. Advances in social cognition, Vol. 1.
15. Fiske ST, Neuberg SL (1990). A continuum model of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influence of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 23. San Diego: Academic Press.
16. Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annu Rev Psychol 51: 93-120.
17. Neuberg SL, Fiske ST (1987). Motivational influences in impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. J Pers Soc Psychol 53: 431-444.
18. Devine PG, Sedikides C, Fuhrman RW (1989). Goals in social information processing: The case of anticipated interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 56: 680-690.
19. Fudenberg D, Maskin E (1986). The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica 54: 53-554.
20. Heide JB, Miner AS (1992). The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation. Acad Manage J 35: 517-528.
21. Berscheid E, Graziano W, Monson T, Dermer M (1976). Outcome dependency: Attention, attribution, and attraction. J Pers Soc Psychol 34: 978-989.
22. Van Bavel JJ, Cunningham WA (2012). A social identity approach to person memory: Group membership, collective identification, and social role shape attention and memory. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 38: 1566-1578.
23. Rossion B, Michel C (2011). An experience-based holistic account of the other-race effect. In: Calder AJ, Rhodes G, Johnson MH, Haxby JV, editors. The oxford handbook of face perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 215-244.
24. Young SG, Bernstein MJ, Hugenberg K (2010). When do own-group biases in face recognition occur? Encoding versus post-encoding. Soc Cogn 28: 240-250.
25. Hugenberg K, Miller J, Claypool HM (2007). Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. J Exp Soc Psychol 43: 334-340.
26. Young SG, Hugenberg K (2012). Individuation motivation and face experience can operate jointly to produce the own-race bias. Soc Psychol Pers Sci 3: 80-87.
27. Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1984). Social Cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. Srull TK, Brand JF (1983). Memory for information about persons: The effect of encoding operations on subsequent retrieval. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav 22: 219-230.
29. Erber R, Fiske ST (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. J Pers Soc Psychol 47: 709-726.
30. Harvey JK, Yarkin KL, Lightner JM, Town JP (1980). Unsolicited interpretation and recall of interpersonal events. J Pers Soc Psychol 38: 551-568.
31. Baldwin M, Keefer LA, Gravelin CR, Biernat M (2012). Perceived importance of cross-race targets facilitates recall: Support for a motivated account of face memory. Group processes and intergroup relations 16: 505-515.
32. Hewstone M, Hantzi A, Johnston L (1991). Social categorization and person memory: The pervasiveness of race as an organizing principle. Eur J Soc Psychol 21: 517-528.
33. Rule NO, Garrett JV, Ambady N (2010). Places and faces: Geographic environment influences the ingroup memory advantage. J Pers Soc Psychol 98: 343-355.
34. Van Bavel JJ, Swencionis JK, O'Connor RC, Cunningham WA (2012). Motivated social memory: Belonging needs moderate the own-group bias in face recognition. J Exp Soc Psychol 48: 707-713.