A consensus perceived glycemic variability metric

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 871-879

  Marling, Cynthia R ^a   Struble, Nigel W ^a   Bunescu, Razvan C ^a   Shubrook, Jay H ^b   Schwartz, Frank L ^b  

^a US Institute of Navigation   (United States)

^b OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood glucose measurement; Continuous glucose monitoring; Glycemic control; Glycemic variability; Machine learning; Support vector regression

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSENSUS; CONSENSUS PERCEIVED GLYCEMIC VARIABILITY; CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE CONTROL; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MACHINE LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTRON; PHYSICIAN; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ANALYSIS; BLOOD; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERCEPTION; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VALIDATION STUDY; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICS;

GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ALGORITHMS; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CONSENSUS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERCEPTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; WEIGHTS AND MEASURES;

EID: 84897120659     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700409     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T, Beck RW, Bissen J, Buckingham B, Deeb L, Dolin RH, Garg SK, Goland R, Hirsch IB, Klonof DC, Kruger DF, Matfin G, Mazze RS, Olson BA, Parkin C, Peters A, Powers MA, Rodriguez H, Southerland P, Strock ES, Tamborlane W, Wesley DM. Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the ambulatory glucose profile. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(2):562-78.
2. Rodbard D, Bailey T, Jovanovic L, Zisser H, Kaplan R, Garg SK. Improved quality of glycemic control and reduced glycemic variability with use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11(11):717-23.
3. Monnier L, Wojtusciszyn A, Colette C, Owens D. The contribution of glucose variability to asymptomatic hypoglycemia in persons with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(8):813-8.
4. Qu Y, Jacober SJ, Zhang Q, Wolka LL, DeVries JH. Rate of hypoglycemia in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes can be predicted from glycemic variability data. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(11):1008-12.
5. Zoungas S, Patel A, Chalmers J, de Galan BE, Li Q, Billot L, Woodward M, Ninomiya T, Neal B, MacMahon S, Grobbee DE, Kengne AP, Marre M, Heller S; ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Severe hypoglycemia and risks of vascular events and death. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(15):1410-8.
6. Seaquist ER, Miller ME, Bonds DE, Feinglos M, Goff DC Jr, Peterson K, Senior P; ACCORD Investigators. The impact of frequent and unrecognized hypoglycemia on mortality in the ACCORD study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(2):409-14.
7. McCoy RG, Van Houten HK, Ziegenfuss JY, Shah ND, Wermers RA, Smith SA. Increased mortality of patients with diabetes reporting severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(9):1897-901.
8. Cryer PE. Severe hypoglycemia predicts mortality in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(9):1814-6.
9. Service FJ, Molnar GD, Rosevear JW, Ackerman E, Gatewood LC, Taylor WF. Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability. Diabetes. 1970;19(9):644-55.
10. Rodbard D. Interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: glycemic variability and quality of glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11 Suppl 1:S55-67.
11. Rodbard D. The challenges of measuring glycemic variability. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(3):712-5.
12. Picconi F, Di Flaviani A, Malandrucco I, Giordani I, Longo S, Frontoni S. The need for identifying standardized indices for measuring glucose variability. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(1):218-9.
13. Siegelaar SE, DeVries JH. Response to the need for identifying standardized indices for measuring glucose variability. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(1):220-1.
14. Marling CR, Shubrook JH, Vernier SJ, Wiley MT, Schwartz FL. Characterizing blood glucose variability using new metrics with continuous glucose monitoring data. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(4):871-8.
15. Wiley M, Bunescu R, Marling C, Shubrook J, Schwartz F. Automatic detection of excessive glycemic variability for diabetes management. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications. New York: IEEE Press; 2011, 148-54.
16. Marling C, Shubrook J, Schwartz F. Toward case-based reasoning for diabetes management: a preliminary clinical study and decision support system prototype. Comput Intel. 2009;25(3):165-79.
17. Schwartz FL, Shubrook JH, Marling CR. Use of case-based reasoning to enhance intensive management of patients on insulin pump therapy. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(4):603-11.
18. Schwartz FL, Vernier SJ, Shubrook JH, Marling CR. Evaluating the automated blood glucose pattern detection and case-retrieval modules of the 4 Diabetes Support System. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(6):1563-9.
19. Hermanides J, Vriesendorp TM, Bosman RJ, Zandstra DF, Hoekstra JB, Devries JH. Glucose variability is associated with intensive care unit mortality. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):838-42.
20. Mastrototaro J, Shin J, Marcus A, Sulur G; STAR 1 Clinical Trial Investigators. The accuracy and efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring sensor in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10(5):385-90.
21. Bequette BW. Continuous glucose monitoring: real-time algorithms for calibration, filtering, and alarms. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(2):404-18.
22. Bishop CM. Neural networks for pattern recognition. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
23. Schölkopf B, Smola AJ. Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization and beyond. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002.
24. Vapnik VN. The nature of statistical learning theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1995.
25. Witten IH, Frank E, Trigg L, Hall M, Holmes G, Cunningham SJ. Weka: practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations. In: Proceedings of ICONIP/ ANZIIS/ANNES99: Future Directions for Intelligent Systems and Information Sciences, Dunedin, New Zealand, 1999, 192-6.
26. Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intel Systems Technol.2011; 2(3):27:1-27. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/ ~cjlin/libsvm. Accessed January 2013.