Attitudes of Canadian citizens toward farm animal welfare: A qualitative study

Livestock Science

Volumn 163, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 150-158

  Spooner, Jeffrey M ^a   Schuppli, Catherine A ^a   Fraser, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Animal welfare; Canada; Consumers; Food animals; Public

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84897109236     PISSN: 18711413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adamson J., Gooberman-Hill R., Woolhead G., Donovan J. 'Questerviews': using questionnaires in qualitative interviews as a method of integrating qualitative and quantitative health services research. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 2004, 9:139-145.
2. ® project and beyond: safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 2010, 60:129-140.
3. Boogaard B.K., Bock B.B., Oosting S.J., Wiskerke J.S.C., van der Zijpp A.J. Social acceptance of dairy farming: the ambivalence between the two faces of modernity. J Agric. Environ. Ethics 2011, 24:259-282.
4. Boogaard B.K., Boekhorst L.J.S., Oosting S.J., Sorensen J.T. Socio-cultural sustainability of pig production: citizen perceptions in the Netherlands and Denmark. Livest. Sci. 2011, 140:189-200.
5. Boogaard B.K., Oosting S.J., Bock B.B. Importance of emotional experiences for societal perception of farm animal welfare: a quantitative study in the Netherlands. Ethics and the Politics of Food 2006, 512-517. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands. M. Kaiser, M.E. Lien (Eds.).
6. Boogaard B.K., Oosting S.J., Bock B.B. Defining sustainability as a socio-cultural concept: citizen panels visiting dairy farms in the Netherlands. Livest. Sci. 2008, 117:24-33.
7. Centner T.J. Limitations on the confinement of food animals in the United States. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2010, 23:469-486.
8. Driessen C. Farmers engaged in deliberative practices: an ethnographic exploration of the mosaic of concerns in livestock agriculture. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2012, 25:163-179.
9. Ellis K.A., Billington K., McNeil B., McKeegan D.E.F. Consumer perceptions of dairy welfare and production: a role for vets in public education?. Cattle Pract. 2009, 17:148-152.
10. European Commission, 2005. Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of Farmed Animals, Special Eurobarometer 229. Available from: (accessed 17.04.13.). http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/euro_barometer25_en.pdf.
11. European Commission, 2007. Attitudes of EU Citizens towards Animal Welfare, Special Eurobarometer 270. Available at: (accessed 17.04.13.). http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_270_en.pdf.
12. Evans, A., Miele, M., 2007. Consumers[U+05F3] Views about Farm Animal Welfare: Part I. Welfare Quality Report Number 4. Cardiff University Press, Cardiff, UK.
13. Fraser D. Animal welfare and the intensification of animal production. The Ethics of Intensification 2008, 167-189. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg. P.B. Thompson (Ed.).
14. Fraser D., Weary D.M., Pajor E.A., Milligan B.N. A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim. Welf. 1997, 6:187-205.
15. Frewer L.J., Kole A., Van De Kroon S.M.A., de Lauwere C. Consumer attitudes towards the development of animal-friendly husbandry systems. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2005, 18:345-367.
16. Friedman G., Himmelstein J. Resolving conflict together: the understanding-based model of mediation. J. Disput. Resolut. 2006, 2006:523-553.
17. Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research 1967, Aldine Publishing, Chicago.
18. Hall C., Sandilands V. Public attitudes to the welfare of broiler chickens. Anim. Welf. 2007, 16:499-512.
19. Harper G., Henson S. Consumer concerns about animal welfare and the impact on food choice. EU Fair CT98-3678. Final Report 2001, Centre for Food Economics Research, University of Reading, Reading.
20. Heid A., Hamm U. Consumer attitudes towards alternatives to piglet castration without pain relief in organic farming: qualitative results from Germany. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2012, 25:687-706.
21. Herzog H. The movement is my life: the psychology of animal rights activism. J. Soc. Issues 1993, 49(1):103-119.
22. Herzog H. Gender differences in human-animal interactions: a review. Anthrozoos 2007, 20:7-21.
23. Herzog H., Betchart N., Pittman R. Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward animals. Anthrozoos 1991, 4:184-191.
24. Jolly, L., Krogh E., Nergaard, T., Parow K., Verstad B., 2004. The farm as a pedagogical resource: background for and evaluation of the co-operation between agriculture and primary school in the county of Nord-Trondelag, Norway. In: Proceedings of the Sixth European IFSA Symposium: Farming and Rural Systems - Research and Extension, vol II. Sevicos de Reportografia da UTAD, Vila Real, Portugal. pp. 497-507.
25. Kendall H.A., Lobao L.M., Sharp J.S. Public concern with animal well-being: place, social structural location, and individual experience. Rural Sociol. 2006, 71:399-428.
26. ® Reports No. 7. 2008, 1-126. Cardiff University Press, Cardiff. U. Kjærnes, B.B. Bock, E. Roe, J. Roex (Eds.).
27. Knight S., Barnett L. Justifying attitudes toward animal use: a qualitative study of people[U+05F3]s views and beliefs. Anthrozoos 2008, 21:31-42.
28. Kohler F. Consumer Concerns about Animal Welfare and the Impact on Food Choice: German Focus Group Report 1999, University of Kiel, Germany.
29. Krystallis A., de Barcellos M.D., Kuegler J.O., Verbeke W., Grunert K.G. Attitudes of European citizens towards pig production systems. Livest. Sci. 2009, 126:46-56.
30. Lassen J., Sandoe P., Forkman B. Happy pigs are dirty! Conflicting perspectives on animal welfare. Livest. Sci. 2006, 103:221-230.
31. Lund V. Natural living - a precondition for animal welfare in organic farming. Livest. Sci. 2006, 100:71-83.
32. Maria G.A. Public perception of farm animal welfare in Spain. Livest. Sci. 2006, 103:250-256.
33. Meehan, H., Cowan, C., McIntrye, B., 2002. Food Choice and Consumer Concerns about Animal Welfare in Ireland. Final Report EC-FAIR Consumer Concern about Animal Welfare and the Impact on Food Choice (CT98-3678). Dublin, Ireland.
34. Miele, M., Evans, A., 2005. European consumers views about farm animal welfare. In: Butterworth, A., (Ed.), Science and Society Improving Animal Welfare. Welfare quality Conference Proceedings, 17/18 November 2005. Brussels, Belgium. pp. 13-29.
35. Miele M., Veissier I., Evans A., Botreau R. Animal welfare: establishing a dialogue between science and society. Anim. Welf. 2011, 20:103-117.
36. Phillips C.J.C., Wojciechowska J., Meng J., Cross N. Perceptions of the importance of different welfare issues in livestock production. Animal 2009, 3:1152-1166.
37. Picard C.A., Melchin K.R. Insight mediation: a learning-centered mediation model. Negot. J. 2007, 23:35-53.
38. Pifer L., Shimizu K., Pifer R. Public attitudes toward animal research - some international comparisons. Soc. Anim. 1994, 2:95-113.
39. Prickett R.W., Norwood F.B., Lusk J.L. Consumer preferences for farm animal welfare: results from a telephone survey of US households. Anim. Welf. 2010, 19:335-347.
40. Serpell J. In the Company of Animals 1996, Cambridge University Press (Canto), Cambridge. Second rev. ed.
41. Spooner J., Schuppli C.A., Fraser D. Attitudes of Canadian beef producers toward animal welfare. Anim. Welf. 2012, 21:273-283.
42. Spooner J., Schuppli C.A., Fraser D. Attitudes of Canadian pig producers toward animal welfare. J Agric. Environ. 2013, (Ethics advance online publication), (Ethics advance online publication). 10.1007/s10806-013-9477-4, 10.1007/s10806-013-9477-4.
43. Statistics Canada, 2006. Population, urban and rural, by province and territory. Available from: (accessed 17.04.13.). http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo62a-eng.htm.
44. Taylor N., Signal T.D. Empathy and attitudes to animals. Anthrozoos 2005, 18:18-27.
45. te Velde H., Aarts N., Van Woerkum C. Dealing with ambivalence: farmers[U+05F3] and consumers[U+05F3] perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2002, 15:203-219.
46. Tuyttens F.A.M., Vanhonacker F., Langendries K., Aluwe M., Millet S., Bekaert K., Verbeke W. Effect of information provisioning on attitude toward surgical castration of male piglets and alternative strategies for avoiding boar taint. Res. Vet. Sci. 2011, 91:327-332.
47. ® operational definition of farm animal welfare and the opinion of Flemish farmers, citizens and vegetarians. Livest. Sci. 2010, 131:108-114.
48. Vanhonacker F., Van Poucke E., Tuyttens F., Verbeke W. Citizens[U+05F3] views on farm animal welfare and related information provision: exploratory insights from Flanders, Belgium. J Agric. Environ. Ethics 2010, 23:551-569.
49. Vanhonacker F., Verbeke W. Consumer response to the possible use of a vaccine method to control boar taint v. physical piglet castration with anaesthesia: a quantitative study in four European countries. Animal 2011, 5:1107-1118.
50. Vanhonacker F., Verbeke W., Tuyttens F.A.M. Belgian consumers[U+05F3] attitude towards surgical castration and immunocastration of piglets. Anim. Welf. 2009, 18:371-380.
51. Vanhonacker F., Verbeke W., Van Poucke E., Tuyttens F.A.M. Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently?. Livest. Sci. 2008, 116:126-136.
52. ® scheme. Anim. Welf. 2011, 20:89-101.
53. Verhoog H., Van Bueren E.T.L., Matze M., Baars T. The value of 'naturalness' in organic agriculture. Njas Wagening. J. Life 2007, 54:333-345.
54. Webster A.J.F. The virtuous bicycle: a delivery vehicle for improved farm animal welfare. Anim. Welf. 2009, 18:141-147.