Social Acceptance of Dairy Farming: The Ambivalence Between the Two Faces of Modernity

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 259-282

  Boogaard, Birgit K ^a   Bock, Bettina B ^a   Oosting, Simon J ^a   Wiskerke, Johannes S C ^a   van der Zijpp, Akke J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Animal farming; Citizens; Public; Society; Values

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL WELFARE; DAIRY FARMING; FOOD SAFETY; LIVESTOCK FARMING; MODERNITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TRADITIONAL AGRICULTURE;

NETHERLANDS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 85028095611     PISSN: 11877863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10806-010-9256-4     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alrøe, H. F., & Kristensen, E. S. (2002). Towards a systemic research methodology in agriculture: Rethinking the role of values in science. Agriculture and Human Values, 19, 3-23.
2. Annevelink, E., Vink, A., Schouten, W. G. P., Smits, A. C., Hemming-Hoffmann, S., Lamaker, E. J. J., & Groot Koerkamp, P. W. G. (2003). Food park, a case study of an integrated sustainable agro production park system designed with agro innovation framework. In Fourth European conference of the European Federation for information technology in agriculture, food and the environment (pp. 90-96).
3. Bell, D. (2006). Variations on the rural idyll. In P. J. Cloke & T. Marsden (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies. London, UK: Sage.
4. Bennett, R. M. (1997). Farm animal welfare and food policy. Food Policy, 22, 281-288.
5. Bieleman, J. (1998). Boeren met machines. Het melkveehouderijbedrijf. In Techniek in Nederland in de twintigste eeuw [Farming with machines. The dairy farm. In Schot, J. W., & de la Bruhèze, A. A. A. (Eds.), Technique in the Netherlands in the twentieth century] (pp. 99-126). Eindhoven: Stichting Historie der Techniek.
6. Bonne, K., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Religious values informing halal meat production and the control and delivery of halal credence quality. Agriculture and Human Values, 25, 35-47.
7. Boogaard, B. K., Oosting, S. J., & Bock, B. B. (2008). Defining sustainability as a socio-cultural concept: Citizen panels visiting dairy farms in the Netherlands. Livestock Science, 117, 24-33.
8. Bos, B., Groot Koerkamp, P. W. G., & Groenestein, K. (2003). A novel design approach for livestock housing based on recursive control-with examples to reduce environmental pollution. Livestock Production Science, 84, 157-170.
9. Cloke, P. (2003). Country visions. Pearson: Harlow.
10. Cloke, P. (2006). Conceptualizing rurality. In P. J. Cloke & T. Marsden (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies. London, UK: Sage.
11. Field, A. (2008). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
12. Franklin, A. (1999). Animals and modern cultures: A sociology of human-animal relations in modernity. London: Sage.
13. Fraser, D. (2001). The "new perception" of animal agriculture: legless cows, featherless chickens and a need for genuine analysis. Journal of Animal Science, 79, 634-641.
14. Haartsen, T., Groote, P., & Huigen, P. P. P. (2003). Measuring age differentials in representations of rurality in the Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 245-252.
15. Hall, C., McVittie, A., & Moran, D. (2004). What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 211-225.
16. Hessing-Couvret, E., & Reuling, A. (2002). Het win-model™. Waardensegmenten in Nederland [The WIN-model™. Value-orientations in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam: The Dutch Institute for Public Opinion.
17. Hessing-Couvret, E., Reuling, A., & Mulder, S. (2003). Het WIN-model. Een segmentatie van de Nederlandse bevolking. [The WIN-model. A segmentation of the Dutch population]. Amsterdam: The Dutch Institute for Public Opinion.
18. Hilhorst, M., & Verhue, D. (2007). Sociaal culturele duurzaamheid van melkveehouderijen. Veldwerkverantwoording [The socio-cultural sustainability of dairy farms. Field work justification]. Amsterdam: Bureau Veldkamp.
19. Holloway, L. (2004). Showing and telling farming: agricultural shows and re-imaging British agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 319-330.
20. Jókövi, E. M. (2000). Recreatie van Turken, Marokkanen en Surinamers in Rotterdam en Amsterdam [Recreation of Turks, Moroccans and Surinamese in Rotterdam and Amsterdam]. Wageningen: Alterra.
21. Jones, O. (1995). Lay discourses of the rural: developments and implications for rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies, 11, 35-49.
22. Kanis, E., Groen, A. F., & De Greef, K. H. (2003). Societal concerns about pork and pork production and their relationships to the production system. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16, 137-162.
23. Kendall, H. A., Lobao, L. M., & Sharp, J. S. (2006). Public concern with animal well-being: Place, social structural location, and individual experience. Rural Sociology, 71(3), 399-428.
24. Kjærnes, U., & Lavik, R. (2007). Farm animal welfare and food consumption practices: Results from surveys in seven countries. In U. Kjærnes, M. Miele, & J. Roex (Eds.), Attitudes of consumers, retailers and producers to farm animal welfare (pp. 1-29). Wales: Cardiff University.
25. Macnaghten, P. (2004). Animals in their nature: A case study on public attitudes to animals, genetic modification and 'nature'. Sociology, 38, 533-551.
26. Macnaghten, P., & Urry, J. (1998). Contested natures. London: Sage.
27. María, G. A. (2006). Public perceptions of farm animal welfare in Spain. Livestock Science, 103, 250-256.
28. Oppenhuisen, J. (2000). Een schaap in de bus? Een onderzoek naar waarden van de Nederlander. [A sheep in the bus? A research into the values of Dutch people]. University of Amsterdam.
29. Oudshoorn, F. W., Renes, R. J., & Boer, I. J. M. (2008). Systems in organic dairy production. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21, 205-228.
30. Rokeach, M. (1973). Nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
31. RR, W. (2007). Wetenschappelijke Raad voor Regeringsbeleid. Identificatie met Nederland. [Scientific Council for Government Policy. Identification with the Netherlands]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
32. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
33. Scott, J. (2006). Sociology: The key concepts. London: Routledge.
34. Sharp, J. S., & Tucker, M. (2005). Awareness and concern about large-scale livestock and poultry: Results from a statewide survey of Ohioans. Rural Sociology, 70, 208-228.
35. Short, J. R. (1991). Imagined country: Environment, culture and society. London: Routledge.
36. Short, B. (2006). Idyllic ruralities. In P. J. Cloke & T. Marsden (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies. London, UK: Sage.
37. Te Velde, H., Aarts, N., & van Woerkum, C. (2002). Dealing with ambivalence: Farmers' and consumers' perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15, 203-219.
38. Tovey, H. (2000). Milk and modernity: Dairying in contemporary Ireland. Research in Rural Sociology, 8, 47-73.
39. Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
40. van Dam, F., Heins, S., & Elbersen, B. S. (2002). Lay discourses of the rural and stated and revealed preferences for rural living. Some evidence of the existence of a rural idyll in the Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 18, 461-476.
41. Weber, G. M., Hoban, T. J., Kendall, P. A., & Bull, L. S. (1995). Consumer concerns about modern technology in agriculture: Considerations for undergraduate and graduate teaching. Journal of Animal Science, 73, 2727-2732.