The impact of modern noninvasive cardiac imaging on coronary intervention rates

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 50-57

  Fröhlich, Georg M ^a,b   Schoch, Boris ^a   Wolfrum, Mathias ^a   Osranek, Martin ^a   Enseleit, Frank ^a   Herzog, Bernhard A ^a   Hasun, Mathias ^a   Lüscher, Thomas F ^a   Meier, Pascal ^b   Gaemperli, Oliver ^a   Kaufmann, Philipp A ^a   Corti, Roberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE; TROPONIN;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BICYCLE ERGOMETRY; CARDIAC IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INVASIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; PROCEDURES;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84897109011     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joic.12079     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Johnson LW, Lozner EC, Johnson S, et al. Coronary arteriography 1984-1987: A report of the registry of the society for cardiac angiography and interventions. I. Results and complications. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;17:5-10.
2. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice ct-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2354-2360.
3. Cook S, Walker A, Hugli O, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe: Prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections based on data up to 2004. Clin Res Cardiol 2007;96:375-382.
4. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 362:886-895.
5. Dorenkamp M, Bonaventura K, Sohns C, et al. Direct costs and cost-effectiveness of dual-source computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Heart 2012;98 (6):460-467.
6. West R, Ellis G, Brooks N. Complications of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation: Results from a confidential inquiry into cardiac catheter complications. Heart 2006;92:810-814.
7. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. CCF/SCCT/ACR/ AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the north American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1864-1894.
8. Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA, et al. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 122:1756-1776.
9. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: A prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2135-2144.
10. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA, et al. Preoperative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1658-1665.
11. Erhardt L, Herlitz J, Bossaert L, et al. Task force on the management of chest pain. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1153-1176.
12. Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999-3054.
13. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 31:2501-2555.
14. Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Executive summary. Fourth joint task force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007;14(Suppl. 2):E1-E40.
15. D'Agostino RB Sr, Grundy S, Sullivan LM, et al. Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: Results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation. JAMA 2001;286:180-187.
16. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: Executive summary: The task force on the management of stable angina pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1341-1381.
17. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical-diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. New Engl J Med 1979;300:1350-1358.
18. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2525-2538.
19. Lear SA, Brozic A, Myers JN, et al. Exercise stress testing. An overview of current guidelines. Sports Med 1999;27:285-312.
20. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al. Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: Clinical experience. J Nucl Med 2007;48:696-703.
21. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, et al. Accuracy of lowdose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: First clinical experience. Eur Heart J 2008;29:3037-3042.
22. Buechel RR, Husmann L, Herzog BA, et al. Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective electrocardiogram triggering: Feasibility in a large population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:332-336.
23. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Koepfli P, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice ct angiography for the detection of functionally relevant coronary stenoses as assessed with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:1162-1171.
24. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/ AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 122:e525-e555.
25. Han PP, Tian YQ, FangW, et al. Impact of myocardial perfusion imaging on in-hospital coronary angiography and revascularization of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Chin Med J (Engl) 2011;124:1603-1609.
26. Lin GA, Dudley RA, Lucas FL, et al. Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2008;300:1765-1773.
27. Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, et al. Estimation of tenyear risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: The score project. Eur Heart J 2003;24:987-1003.