Abortion barriers and perceptions of gestational age among women seeking abortion care in the latter half of the second trimester

Contraception

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 322-327

  Janiak, Elizabeth ^a,b   Kawachi, Ichiro ^a   Goldberg, Alisa ^b,c,d   Gottlieb, Barbara ^a,b  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts   (United States)

Author keywords

Abortion barriers; Second trimester abortion

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; FINANCE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERCEPTION; RACE; RISK FACTOR; SECOND TRIMESTER ABORTION; ADULT; ADOLESCENT; INDUCED ABORTION; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; YOUNG ADULT;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897108224     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. R.K. Jones, and M.L. Kavanaugh Changes in abortion rates between 2000 and 2008 and lifetime incidence of abortion Obstet Gynecol 117 6 2011 1358 1366
2. E.G. Raymond, and D.A. Grimes The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States Obstet Gynecol 119 2 2012 215 219
3. R.K. Jones, and K. Kooistra Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008 Perspect Sex Reprod Health 43 1 2011 41 50
4. Guttmacher Institute [Internet] New York: Guttmacher Institute; c2013. [Updated 2013 June 1; cited 2013 June 12]. State policies in brief: an overview of abortion laws Available from: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/ spib-OAL.pdf
5. L. Haddad, S. Yanow, L. Delli-Bovi, K. Cosby, and T.A. Weitz Changes in abortion provider practice in response to the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 Contraception 79 2009 379 384
6. Henshaw SK, Wallisch LS. The Medicaid cutoff and abortion services for the poor. Fam Plann Perspect. 1984;16(4):171-2, 177-80.
7. T. Joyce, and R. Kaestner The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion Fam Plann Perspect 32 1 2000 4 13
8. S. Colman, and T. Joyce Minors' behavioral responses to parental involvement laws: delaying abortion until age 18 Perspect Sex Reprod Health 41 2 2009 119 126
9. A. Dennis, S.K. Henshaw, T.J. Joyce, L.B. Finer, and K. Blanchard The impact of laws requiring parental involvement for abortion: a literature review 2009 Guttmacher Institute New York
10. E.A. Drey, D.G. Foster, R.A. Jackson, S.J. Lee, L.H. Cardenas, and P.D. Darney Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester Obstet Gynecol 107 1 2006 128 135
11. D.G. Foster, R.A. Jackson, K. Cosby, T.A. Weitz, P.D. Darney, and E.A. Drey Predictors of delay in each step leading to an abortion Contraception 77 2008 289 293
12. J.W. Kiley, L.M. Yee, C.M. Niemi, J.M. Fineglass, and M.A. Simon Delays in request for pregnancy termination: comparison of patients in the first and second trimesters Contraception 81 2010 446 451
13. L.B. Finer, L.F. Frohwirth, L.A. Dauphinee, S. Singh, and A.M. Moore Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States Contraception 74 2006 334 344
14. Guttmacher Institute [Internet] New York: Guttmacher Institute; c2013. [Updated 2013 October 1; cited 2013 October 23]. State policies in brief: state funding of abortion under Medicaid Available from: http://www.guttmacher.org/ statecenter/spibs/spib-SFAM.pdf
15. Abortion services. In: Commonwealth of Massachusetts. MassHealth provider manual series, physician manual. Commonwealth of Massachusetts: 1 January 2006. p. 45.
16. NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts [Internet] Boston: NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts; c2011. [Updated 2011 October; cited 2013 November 8]. Access to abortion care in Massachusetts Available from: http://www.prochoicemass.org/ media/2011abortion.shtml 2011
17. B.O. Verburg, E.A.P. Steegers, M. De Ridder, R.J.M. Snijders, E. Smith, and A. Hofman et al. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31 2008 388 396
18. An act relative to parental guidance and informed consent concerning certain medical procedures within present constitutional limits. Massachusetts General Law, Part I, Title XVI, Chapter 112, Section 12S (June 5, 1980).
19. A.G. Raymond Massachusetts health reform: a five-year progress report. Boston: Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation of Massachusetts, 17 November 2011. [Cited 2012 January 11] Available from: https://www.mahealthconnector.org/ portal/binary/com.epicentric.contentmanagement.servlet.ContentDeliveryServlet/ Health%2520Care%2520Reform/Overview/BlueCrossFoundation5YearRpt.pdf
20. D. Bessett, K. Gorski, D. Jinadasa, M. Ostrow, and M.J. Peterson Out of time and out of pocket: experiences of women seeking state-subsidized insurance for abortion care in Massachusetts Womens Health Issues 21 3 Suppl 2011 S21 S25
21. R.K. Jones, U.D. Upadhyay, and T.A. Weitz At what cost? Payment for abortion care by U.S. women Womens Health Issues 23 3 2013 e173 e3178
22. Institute of Medicine Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare 2003 National Academy Press Washington, DC
23. R.K. Jones, and L.B. Finer Who has second trimester abortions in the United States? Contraception 85 6 2012 544 551
24. Guttmacher Institute [Internet] New York: Guttmacher Institute; c2013. [Updated 2013 October 1; cited 2013 October 23]. State policies in brief: state policies on later abortions Available from: http://www.guttmacher.org/ statecenter/spibs/spib-SFAM.pdf