Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 128-135

  Drey, Eleanor A ^a   Foster, Diana G ^b   Jackson, Rebecca A ^b   Lee, Susan J ^b   Cardenas, Lilia H ^b   Darney, Philip D ^b  

^a Port of San Francisco   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; FEMALE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; GESTATION PERIOD; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; INDUCED ABORTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; NAUSEA; PATIENT REFERRAL; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; URBAN AREA; VOMITING; AGE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FOLLOW UP; MATERNAL AGE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROBABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TIME;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MATERNAL AGE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, FIRST; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; PROBABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33644870451     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000189095.32382.d0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Neb Rev Stat §§28-326, 28-328 (2004).
2. Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003, 18 USCS §1531 (2005).
3. Strauss LT, Herndon J, Chang J. et al Abortion surveillance: United States, 2001. MMWR Surveill Summ 2004;53:1-32.
4. Henshaw SK, Finer LB. The accessibility of abortion services in the United States, 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2003;35:16-24.
5. Adler NE, David HP, Major BN. et al Psychological responses after abortion. Science 1990;248:41-4.
6. Lawson H, Frye A, Atrash H. et al Abortion mortality, United States, 1972 through 1987. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:1365-72.
7. Kerenyi TD, Glascock EL, Horowitz ML. Reasons for delayed abortion: results of four hundred interviews. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973;117:299-311.
8. Mallory GB Jr, Rubenstein LZ, Drosness DL. et al Factors responsible for delay in obtaining interruption of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1972;40:556-62.
9. Fielding W, Sachtleben M, Friedman L, Friedman E. Comparison of women seeking early and late abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;131:304-10.
10. Bracken MB, Swigar ME. Factors associated with delay in seeking induced abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972;113:301-9.
11. Bracken MB, Kasl SV. Psychosocial correlates of delayed decisions to abort. Health Educ Monogr 1976;4:6-44.
12. Burr WA, Schulz KF. Delayed abortion in an area of easy accessibility. JAMA 1980;244:44-8.
13. Bracken MB, Kasl SV. First and repeat abortions: a study of decision-making and delay. J Biosoc Sci 1975;7:473-91.
14. Torres A, Forrest JD. Why do women have abortions? Fam Plann Perspect 1988;20:169-76.
15. Lynxwiler J, Wilson M. A case study of race differences among late abortion patients. Women Health 1994;21:43-56.
16. Slonim-Nevo V, Anson J, Sova J. Delayed abortion among teenagers: can a population at risk be identified? Health Care Women Int 1995;16:101-12.
17. Poliak J, Morgenthau JE. Adolescent aborters: factors associated with gestational age. NY State J Med 1982;82:176-9.
18. Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM. et al Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science 1998;280:867-73.
19. Katz M. Multivariable Analysis: A Practical Guide for Physicians. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press; 1999.