Two distinct dynamic modes subtend the detection of unexpected sounds

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  King, Jean Rémi ^a,b,c   Gramfort, Alexandre ^b,d   Schurger, Aaron ^a,b   Naccache, Lionel ^c,e   Dehaene, Stanislas ^a,b,f,g  

^a Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ^*  (France)

^b DIF   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d INSTITUT TELECOM   (France)

^e PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^g Grp de Biol de la Cellule N   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; SOUND DETECTION; TEMPORAL DISSOCIATION;

ADULT; AREA UNDER CURVE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ROC CURVE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84897092074     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085791     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Näätänen R, Astikainen P, Ruusuvirta T, Huotilainen M (2010) Automatic auditory intelligence: an expression of the sensory-cognitive core of cognitive processes. Brain Research Reviews 64: 123-136.
2. Goldstein A, Spencer KM, Donchin E (2002) The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and Novelty P3. Psychophysiology 39: 781-790. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3960781. (Pubitemid 36025320)
3. Hari R, Hämäläinen M, Ilmoniemi R, Kaukoranta E, Reinikainen K, et al. (1984) Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: Neuromagnetic recordings in man. Neuroscience Letters 50: 127-132. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(84)90474-9. (Pubitemid 14074937)
4. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Stephan KE, Friston KJ (2009) The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clinical neurophysiology 120: 453-463. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029.
5. Näätänen R, Paavilainen P, Rinne T, Alho K (2007) The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology 118: 2544-2590. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04. 026. (Pubitemid 350182437)
6. Halgren E, Baudena P, Clarke JM, Heit G, Marinkovic K, et al. (1995) Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 94: 229-250. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(95)98475-N.
7. Bekinschtein TA, Dehaene S, Rohaut B, Tadel F, Cohen L, et al. (2009) Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 1672-1677. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809667106.
8. Polich J (2007) Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical neurophysiology 118: 2128-2148. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019.
9. Faugeras F, Rohaut B, Weiss N, Bekinschtein TA, Galanaud D, et al. (2011) Probing consciousness with event-related potentials in the vegetative state. Neurology 77: 264-268. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182217ee8.
10. Faugeras F, Rohaut B, Weiss N, Bekinschtein T, Galanaud D, et al. (2012) Event related potentials elicited by violations of auditory regularities in patients with impaired consciousness. Neuropsychologia 50: 403-418. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.015.
11. King JR, Faugeras F, Gramfort A, Schurger A, El Karoui I, et al. (2013) Singletrial decoding of auditory novelty responses facilitates the detection of residual consciousness. NeuroImage 83C: 726-738. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013. 07.013.
12. Chennu S, Noreika V, Gueorguiev D, Blenkmann A, Kochen S, et al. (2013) Expectation and Attention in Hierarchical Auditory Prediction. The Journal of Neuroscience 33: 11194-11205. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0114-13.2013.
13. Fischer C, Luaute J, Morlet D (2010) Event-related potentials (MMN and novelty P3) in permanent vegetative or minimally conscious states. Clinical neurophysiology 121: 1032-1042. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.02.005.
14. Tiitinen H, May P, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R (1994) Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature 372: 90-92. doi:10.1038/372090a0. (Pubitemid 24339487)
15. Wacongne C, Labyt E, Van Wassenhove V, Bekinschtein T, Naccache L, et al. (2011) Evidence for a hierarchy of predictions and prediction errors in human cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 20754-20759. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117807108.
16. Polich J, Margala C (1997) P300 and probability: comparison of oddball and single-stimulus paradigms. International Journal of Psychophysiology 25: 169-176. (Pubitemid 27142006)
17. Squires NK, Squires KC, Hillyard SA (1975) Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 38: 387-401. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(75)90263-1.
18. Dehaene S, Changeux JP, Naccache L, Sackur J, Sergent C (2006) Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 204-211. (Pubitemid 43674496)
19. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Kiebel SJ, Stephan KE, Friston KJ (2007) Dynamic causal modelling of evoked potentials: a reproducibility study. NeuroImage 36: 571-580. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.014. (Pubitemid 46907636)
20. Wacongne C, Changeux JP, Dehaene S (2012) A neuronal model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. The Journal of neuroscience 32: 3665-3678. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5003-11.2012.
21. Rao RP, Ballard DH (1999) Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature neuroscience 2: 79-87. (Pubitemid 30488944)
22. Pouget A, Deneve S, Duhamel JR (2002) A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3: 741-747. (Pubitemid 135706679)
23. Friston K (2005) A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London - Series B: Biological Sciences 360: 815-836.
24. Taulu S, Kajola M, Simola J (2004) Suppression of interference and artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method. Brain topography 16: 269-275. (Pubitemid 38988009)
25. Uusitalo MA, Ilmoniemi RJ (1997) Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 35: 135-140. doi:10.1007/BF02534144. (Pubitemid 27179923)
26. Lemm S, Blankertz B, Dickhaus T, Müller KR (2011) Introduction to machine learning for brain imaging. NeuroImage 56: 387-399. doi:10.1016/j. neuroimage.2010.11.004.
27. Gramfort A, Luessi M, Larson E, Engemann D, Strohmeier D, et al. (2013) MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data. Available: http://martinos.org/ mne/dev/auto-examples/decoding/plot-decoding-time-generalization.html. Accessed 2013 Jan 3.
28. Gramfort A, Luessi M, Larson E, Engemann D, Strohmeier D, et al. (2013) MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data. NeuroImage: 1-33. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027.
29. Wakeman DG, Henson RN (2010) Functional and structural connectivity in face-processing: MEG, EEG, fMRI, MRI and DWI data. BioMag Conference.
30. Chang C, Lin C (2001) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. Computer 2: 1-30. doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199.
31. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O (1999) Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 151-162. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01299-1. (Pubitemid 29155465)
32. Platt JC (1999) Probabilistic Outputs for Support Vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods. Advances in Large Margin Classifiers 10: 61-74.
33. Pedregosa F, Weiss R, Brucher M (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12: 2825-2830.
34. Lindquist MA, Caffo B, Crainiceanu C (2013) Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules". NeuroImage 81: 499-502. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.056.
35. Friston K (2013) Sample size and the fallacies of classical inference. NeuroImage 81: 503-504.
36. Ingre M (2013) Why small low-powered studies are worse than large highpowered studies and how to protect against "trivial" findings in research: comment on Friston (2012). NeuroImage 81: 496-498. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.030.
37. Nikolić D, Häusler S, Singer W, Maass W (2009) Distributed fading memory for stimulus properties in the primary visual cortex. PLoS biology 7: e1000260. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000260.
38. Stokes MG, Kusunoki M, Sigala N, Nili H, Gaffan D, et al. (2013) Dynamic coding for cognitive control in prefrontal cortex. Neuron 78: 364-375. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.039.
39. Meyers EM, Freedman DJ, Kreiman G, Miller EK, Poggio T, et al. (2008) Dynamic population coding of category information in inferior temporal and prefrontal cortex. Journal of neurophysiology 100: 1407-1419. doi:10.1152/jn.90248.2008.
40. Philiastides MG, Sajda P (2006) Temporal characterization of the neural correlates of perceptual decision making in the human brain. Cerebral cortex 16: 509-518. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi130.
41. Zhang Y, Meyers EM, Bichot NP, Serre T, Poggio TA, et al. (2011) Object decoding with attention in inferior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 8850-8855. doi:10.1073/pnas.1100999108.
42. Carlson TA (2011) High temporal resolution decoding of object position and category. 11: 1-17. doi:10.1167/11.10.9.Introduction.
43. Carlson T, Tovar DA, Kriegeskorte N (2013) Representational dynamics of object vision: The first 1000 ms. 13: 1-19. doi:10.1167/13.10.1.doi.
44. Fuentemilla L, Penny WD, Cashdollar N, Bunzeck N, Düzel E (2010) Theta-coupled periodic replay in working memory. Current Biology 20: 606-612. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.057.
45. Schurger A, Marti S, Dehaene S (2013) Reducing multi-sensor data to a single time course that reveals experimental effects. BMC neuroscience 14: 122. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-122.
46. Duncan KK, Hadjipapas A, Li S, Kourtzi Z, Bagshaw A, et al. (2010) Identifying spatially overlapping local cortical networks with MEG. Human Brain Mapping 31: 1003-1016. doi:10.1002/hbm.20912.
47. Sandberg K, Bahrami B, Kanai R, Barnes GR, Overgaard M, et al. (2013) Early visual responses predict conscious face perception within and between subjects during binocular rivalry. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 25: 969-985. doi:10.1162/jocn-a-00353.
48. Ramkumar P, Jas M, Pannasch S, Hari R, Parkkonen L (2013) Feature-specific information processing precedes concerted activation in human visual cortex. The Journal of neuroscience 33: 7691-7699. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 3905-12.2013.
49. Garcia JO, Srinivasan R, Serences JT (2013) Near-real-time feature-selective modulations in human cortex. Current Biology 23: 515-522. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.013.
50. Näätänen R, Picton T (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24: 375-425. (Pubitemid 17114207)
51. Garrido MI, Friston KJ, Kiebel SJ, Stephan KE, Baldeweg T, et al. (2008) The functional anatomy of the MMN: a DCM study of the roving paradigm. NeuroImage 42: 936-944. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.018.
52. Kojima S, Goldman-Rakic PS (1982) Delay-related activity of prefrontal neurons in rhesus monkeys performing delayed response. Brain Research 248: 43-50. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(82)91145-3. (Pubitemid 12024457)
53. Romo R, Brody CD, Hernández A, Lemus L (1999) Neuronal correlates of parametric working memory in the prefrontal cortex. Nature 399: 470-473. doi:10.1038/20939. (Pubitemid 29258852)
54. Fuster JM (2008) The Prefrontal Cortex. Raven, editor Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80673-X.
55. Dehaene S, Changeux JP (2011) Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron 70: 200-227. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018.