Estimation of genealogical coancestry in plant species using a pedigree reconstruction algorithm and application to an oil palm breeding population

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 127, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 981-994

  Cros, David ^a   Sánchez, Leopoldo ^b   Cochard, Benoit ^a   Samper, Patrick ^a   Denis, Marie ^a   Bouvet, Jean Marc ^a   Fernández, Jesús ^c  

^a UMR AGAP   (France)

^b National Institute for Agricultural Research   (France)

^c INIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; PALM OIL; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

BREEDING POPULATIONS; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; GENETIC PARAMETERS; HARDY-WEINBERG EQUILIBRIUM; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHMS; RELIABLE ESTIMATES; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

ELAEIS;

MICROSATELLITE DNA; PALM OIL; VEGETABLE OIL;

ALGORITHM; ARECACEAE; ARTICLE; BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PEDIGREE; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; SELF FERTILIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; ARECACEAE; BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PEDIGREE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT OILS; SELF-FERTILIZATION;

EID: 84897086294     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-014-2273-3     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adams W, Neale D, Loopstra C (1988) Verifying controlled crosses in conifer tree-improvement programs. Silvae genetica 37: 147-152.
2. Almudevar A (2003) A simulated annealing algorithm for maximum likelihood pedigree reconstruction. Theor Popul Biol 63: 63-75.
3. Almudevar A (2007) A graphical approach to relatedness inference. Theor Popul Biol 71: 213-229.
4. Atkin FC, Dieters MJ, Stringer JK (2009) Impact of depth of pedigree and inclusion of historical data on the estimation of additive variance and breeding values in a sugarcane breeding program. Theor Appl Genet 119: 555-565.
5. Billotte N, Marseillac N, Risterucci AM et al (2005) Microsatellite-based high density linkage map in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Theor Appl Genet 110: 754-765.
6. Blouin MS (2003) DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends Ecol Evolut Pers Ed 18: 503-511.
7. Butler K, Field C, Herbinger CM, Smith BR (2004) Accuracy, efficiency and robustness of four algorithms allowing full sibship reconstruction from DNA marker data. Mol Ecol 13: 1589-1600.
8. Caballero A (1994) Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73: 657-679.
9. Cervantes I, Goyache F, Molina A, Valera M, Gutiérrez JP (2011) Estimation of effective population size from the rate of coancestry in pedigreed populations. J Anim Breed Genet 128: 56-63.
10. Cochard B (2008) Etude de la diversité génétique et du déséquilibre de liaison au sein de populations améliorées de palmier à huile (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, p 175.
11. Cochard B, Adon B, Rekima S et al (2009) Geographic and genetic structure of African oil palm diversity suggests new approaches to breeding. Tree Genetics Genomes 5: 493-504.
12. Corley RHV (2005) Illegitimacy in oil palm breeding-a review. J Oil Palm Res 17: 64-69.
13. Corley RHV, Tinker PB (2003) Selection and breeding. In: Blackwell Science Ltd (ed) The oil palm, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 133-199.
14. Cowell RG (2009) Efficient maximum likelihood pedigree reconstruction. Theor Popul Biol 76: 285-291.
15. Doerksen TK, Herbinger CM (2010) Impact of reconstructed pedigrees on progeny-test breeding values in red spruce. Tree Genetics Genomes 6: 591-600.
16. Eding H, Meuwissen THE (2001) Marker-based estimates of between and within population kinships for the conservation of genetic diversity. J Anim Breed Genet 118: 141-159.
17. Emigh T (1980) Comparison of tests for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Biometrics 36: 627-642.
18. Emik LO, Terrill CE (1949) Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J Hered 40: 51-55.
19. Ericsson T (1999) The effect of pedigree error by misidentification of individual trees on genetic evaluation of a full-sib experiment. Silvae genetica 48: 239-242.
20. Fernández J, Toro MA (2006) A new method to estimate relatedness from molecular markers. Mol Ecol 15: 1657-1667.
21. Fernández J, Villanueva B, Pong-Wong R, Toro MA (2005) Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs. Genetics 170: 1313-1321.
22. Garbe JR, Da Y (2008) Pedigraph user manual Version 2. 4. Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota.
23. Gasbarra D, Pirinen M, Sillanpaa M, Arjas E (2007a) Estimating genealogies from linked marker data: a Bayesian approach. BMC Bioinforma 8: 411.
24. Gasbarra D, Pirinen M, Sillanpää MJ, Salmela E, Arjas E (2007b) Estimating genealogies from unlinked marker data: a Bayesian approach. Theor Popul Biol 72: 305-322.
25. Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48: 361-372.
26. Gutiérrez JP, Goyache F (2005) A note on ENDOG: a computer program for analysing pedigree information. J Anim Breed Genet 122: 172-176.
27. Gutiérrez JP, Cervantes I, Molina A, Valera M, Goyache F (2008) Individual increase in inbreeding allows estimating effective sizes from pedigrees. Genet Sel Evol 40: 359-378.
28. Gutiérrez JP, Cervantes I, Goyache F (2009) Improving the estimation of realized effective population sizes in farm animals. J Anim Breed Genet 126: 327-332.
29. Hill WG (1981) Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Genet Res 38: 209-216.
30. Jarne P, Auld JR (2006) Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 60: 1816-1824.
31. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220: 671-680.
32. Kumar S, Gerber S, Richardson TE, Gea L (2007) Testing for unequal paternal contributions using nuclear and chloroplast SSR markers in polycross families of radiata pine. Tree Genetics Genomes 3: 207-214.
33. McIntyre CL, Jackson PA (2001) Low level of selfing found in a sample of crosses in Australian sugarcane breeding programs. Euphytica 117: 245-249.
34. Meuwissen T (2009) Genetic management of small populations: a review. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A Animal Sci 59: 71-79.
35. Morrissey MB, Wilson AJ (2010) pedantics: an r package for pedigree-based genetic simulation and pedigree manipulation, characterization and viewing. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 711-719.
36. Pemberton JM (2008) Wild pedigrees: the way forward. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 275: 613-621.
37. Riester M, Stadler PF, Klemm K (2009) FRANz: reconstruction of wild multi-generation pedigrees. Bioinformatics 25: 2134-2139.
38. Voorrips RE (2007) Pedimap: software for visualization of genetic and phenotypic data in pedigrees. Plant Research International, Wageningen.
39. Waples RS (2005) Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply? Mol Ecol 14: 3335-3352.
40. Waples RS (2006) A bias correction for estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium at unlinked gene loci. Conserv Genet 7: 167-184.
41. Waples RS, Do CHI (2008) LDNE: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 753-756.
42. Zhao J (2007) gap: genetic analysis package. J Stat Softw 23: 1-18.
43. Zub K, Piertney S, Szafranska PA, Konarzewski M (2012) Environmental and genetic influences on body mass and resting metabolic rates (RMR) in a natural population of weasel Mustela nivalis. Mol Ecol 21: 1283-1293.