Source excitation strategies for obtaining impulse responses in finite difference time domain room acoustics simulation

Applied Acoustics

Volumn 82, Issue , 2014, Pages 6-14

  Murphy, Damian T ^a   Southern, Alex ^b   Savioja, Lauri ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Finite difference scheme; Room acoustic simulation

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; FINITE DIFFERENCE TIME DOMAIN METHOD; TRANSIENT ANALYSIS;

COMPENSATION FILTERS; FDTD SIMULATIONS; FINITE DIFFERENCE SCHEME; FREQUENCY SPECTRA; FUNDAMENTAL CHANGES; IMPULSE EXCITATIONS; ROOM ACOUSTIC SIMULATIONS; TRANSPARENT SOURCE;

ARCHITECTURAL ACOUSTICS;

EID: 84897067676     PISSN: 0003682X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Van Duyne S, Smith JO. Physical modeling with the 2-D digital waveguide mesh. In: Proceedings of the international computer music conference, Tokyo, Japan; September 1993. p. 40-7.
2. D. Botteldooren Finite difference time domain simulation of low frequency room acoustic problems J Acoust Soc Am 98 6 1995 33023308
3. D. Murphy, A. Kelloniemi, J. Mullen, and S. Shelley Acoustic modeling using the digital waveguide mesh IEEE Signal Process Mag 24 2007 55 66 (Pubitemid 46534532)
4. K. Kowalczyk, and M. van Walstijn Modelling frequency-dependent boundaries as digital impedance filters in FDTD and K-DWM room acoustics simulations J Audio Eng Soc 56 2008 569 583
5. K. Kowalczyk, M. van Walstijn, and D. Murphy A phase grating approach to modeling surface diffusion in FDTD room acoustics simulations IEEE Trans Audio, Speech, Language Process 19 2011 528 537
6. Sheaffer J, van Walstijn M, Fazenda B. A physically-constrained source model for FDTD acoustic simulation. In: Proc. 15th international conference on digital audio effects (DAFx-12), York, UK, September 17-21; 2012. p. 85-92.
7. J. Sheaffer, M. van Walstijn, and B. Fazenda Physical and numerical constraints in source modeling for finite difference simulation of room acoustics J Acoust Soc Am 135 2014 251 261
8. M. Karjalainen, and C. Erkut Digital waveguides versus finite difference structures: equivalence and mixed modeling EURASIP J Appl Signal Process 7 2004 978 989
9. Botts J, Savioja L. Integrating finite difference schemes for scalar and vector wave equations. In: Proc. IEEE international conf. acoust., speech, signal processing. Canada (BC): Vancouver; May 2013.
10. J. Schneider, C. Wagner, and O. Ramahi Implementation of transparent sources embedded in acoustic finite-difference time-domain grids J Acoust Soc Am 103 1998 136 142 (Pubitemid 28042388)
11. H. Jeong, and W. Lam Y Source implementation to eliminate low-frequency artefacts in finite difference time domain room acoustic simulation J Acoust Soc Am 131 2012 258 268
12. K. Kowalczyk, and M. van Walstijn Room acoustics simulation using 3-D compact explicit FDTD schemes IEEE Trans Audio, Speech Language Process 19 2011 34 46
13. L. Savioja, and V. Välimäki Reducing the dispersion error in the digital waveguide mesh using interpolation and frequency-warping techniques IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 8 2000 184 194 (Pubitemid 30578372)
14. Savioja L. Real-time 3D finite-difference time-domain simulation of low- and mid-frequency room acoustics. In: Proc. international conference on digital audio effects (DAFx-10), Graz, Austria; September 2010. p. 43-50.
15. Southern A, Murphy D, Campos G, Dias, P. Finite difference room acoustic modelling on a general purpose graphics processing unit. In: Proc. of the 128th AES convention, London, UK; May 2010.
16. López JJ, Carnicero D, Ferrando N, Escolano J. Parallelization of the finite-difference time-domain method for room acoustics modelling based on CUDA. Math Comput Modell. ISSN 0895-7177, 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.11.075. < http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895717711007606 >; 2011 [available 14.12.2011].
17. Webb C, Bilbao S. Binaural simulations using audio rate FDTD schemes and CUDA. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on digital audio effects (DAFx-12), York, UK, September 17-21; 2012. p. 97-100.
18. Z. Chen, and R. Maher Analytical expression for impulse response between two nodes in 2-D rectangular digital waveguide mesh IEEE Signal Process Lett 15 2008 221 224
19. E. Leung, C.P. Lee, N. Jacobi, and T.G. Wang Resonance frequency shift of an acoustic chamber containing a rigid sphere J Acoust Soc Am 72 1982 615 620 (Pubitemid 12550297)
20. J.B. Mehl, and R.N. Hill Acoustic eigenfrequencies of cavities with an internal obstacle: a modified perturbation theory J Acoust Soc Am 85 1989 1841 1851
21. J. Escolano, J. López, and B. Puco Directive sources in acoustic discrete-time domain simulations based on directivity diagrams J Acoust Soc Am 121 2007 EL256 62
22. H. HacIhabiboǧlu, B. Günel, and A. Kondoz Time-domain simulation of directive sources in 3-D digital waveguide mesh-based acoustical models IEEE Trans Audio, Speech Language Process 16 5 2008 934 946
23. Southern A, Murphy DT. Low complexity directional sound sources for finite difference time domain room acoustic models. In: Proc. of the 126th AES convention, Munich, Germany; May 2009.