Source implementation to eliminate low-frequency artifacts in finite difference time domain room acoustic simulation

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 258-268

  Jeong, Hyok ^a   Lam, Yiu Wai ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC PROPAGATION; ARBITRARY GEOMETRY; FDTD METHOD; FINITE DIFFERENCE TIME DOMAINS; FREQUENCY DEPENDENT; HARD SOURCE; IMPLEMENTATION METHODS; LOW FREQUENCY; LOW-FREQUENCY MODULATION; NATURAL SOURCES; NUMERICAL TECHNIQUES; ROOM ACOUSTIC SIMULATIONS; ROOM ACOUSTICS; SIDE EFFECT; TIME LIMITED; TIME RESPONSE; TRANSPARENT SOURCE;

ACOUSTICS; ARCHITECTURAL ACOUSTICS; FINITE DIFFERENCE TIME DOMAIN METHOD; NUMERICAL METHODS;

TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

EID: 84855929695     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3652886     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. D. Botteldooren, Acoustical finite difference time domain simulation in a quasi Cartesian grid, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2313-2319 (1994). 10.1121/1.409866 (Pubitemid 24152818)
2. D. Botteldooren, Finite difference time domain simulation of low frequency room acoustic problems, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 3302-3308 (1995). 10.1121/1.413817
3. A. Celestinos and S. B. Nielsen, Multi-source low frequency room simulation using finite difference time domain approximations, Audio Engineering Society 117th Convention, San Francisco, (2004), preprint 6264.
4. J. LoVetri, D. Mardare, and G. Soulodre, Modeling of the seat dip effect using the finite difference time domain method, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 2204-2212 (1996). 10.1121/1.417929 (Pubitemid 26339988)
5. Y. zyörük and L. N. Long, A time-domain implementation of surface acoustic impedance condition with and without flow, AIAA Paper No. 1996-1663 (1996).
6. J. B. Schneider, C. L. Wagner, and S. L. Broschat, Implementation of transparent sources embedded in acoustic finite-difference time-domain grids, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 136-142 (1998). 10.1121/1.421084 (Pubitemid 28042388)
7. S. Sakamoto, Phase-error analysis of high-order finite difference time domain scheme and its influence on calculation results of impulse response in closed sound field, Acoust. Sci. Technol. 28, 295-309 (2007). 10.1250/ast.28.295 (Pubitemid 47372720)
8. S. Sakamoto, H. Nagatomo, A. Ushiyama, and H. Tachibana, Calculation of impulse responses and acoustic parameters in a hall by the finite-difference time-domain method, Acoust. Sci. Technol. 29, 256-265 (2008). 10.1250/ast.29.256
9. H. Suzuki, A. Omoto, and K. Fujiwara, Treatment of boundary conditions by finite difference time domain method, Acoust. Sci. Technol. 28, 16-26 (2007). 10.1250/ast.28.16 (Pubitemid 46041281)
10. J. S. Suh and P. A. Nelson, Measurement of transient response of rooms and comparison with geometrical acoustic models, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 2304-2317 (1999). 10.1121/1.426837 (Pubitemid 29174318)
11. S. K. Olesen, Low frequency room simulation using finite difference equations, Audio Engineering Society 102nd Convention, Munich, (1997), preprint 4422.
12. Y. W. Lam, Issues for computer modelling of room acoustics in non-concert hall settings, Acoust. Sci. Technol. 26, 145-155 (2005). 10.1250/ast.26.145 (Pubitemid 40401690)
13. P. M. Morse and U. Ingard, Theoritical Acoustics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 1986), pp. 571-572.