Using Space Syntax to Assess the Built Environment for Physical Activity: Applications to Research on Parks and Public Open Spaces

Leisure Sciences

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 206-216

  Koohsari, Mohammad Javad ^a,b,c   Kaczynski, Andrew T ^d   Mcormack, Gavin R ^e   Sugiyama, Takemi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c BAKER IDI HEART AND DIABETES INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

parks; physical activity; public health; public open space; space syntax; spatial configuration; urban design

Indexed keywords

OPEN SPACE; PARK DESIGN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PUBLIC SPACE; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; RECREATIONAL FACILITY; URBAN DESIGN;

EID: 84897051655     PISSN: 01490400     EISSN: 15210588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2013.856722     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baran, P.K., Rodríguez, D.A., & Khattak, A.J. (2008). Space syntax and walking in a new urbanist and suburban neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), 5-28.
2. Brownson, R.C., Hoehner, C.M., Day, K., Forsyth, A., & Sallis, J.F. (2009). Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(4, Supplement 1), S99-123.e112.
3. Cohen, R., & Weatherford, D.L. (1980). Effects of route traveled on the distance estimates of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 403-412.
4. Cutumisu, N., & Spence, J.C. (2009). Exploring associations between urban environments and children's physical activity: Making the case for space syntax. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12(5), 537-538.
5. Handy, S., Paterson, R.G., & Butler, K.S. (2003). Planning for street connectivity: Getting from here to there. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association, Planning Advisory Service.
6. Handy, S.L., Tal, G., & Boarnet, M. (2010). Draft policy brief on the impacts of network connectivity based on a review of the empirical literature. Retrieved from http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/policies/connectivity/netconnectivity_brief.pdf
7. Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Hillier, B., Hanson, J., & Graham, H. (1987). Ideas are in things: An application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 14(4), 363-385.
10. Hillier, B., & Iida, S. (2005). Network and psychological effects in urban movement. In A.J. Cohn & D.M. Mark (Eds.), Proceedings of Spatial Information Theory: International Conference, COSIT 2005 (pp. 475-490). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
11. Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 29-66.
12. Hoehner, C.M., Ivy, A., Brennan Ramirez, L.K., Handy, S., & Brownson, R.C. (2007). Active neighborhood checklist: A user-friendly and reliable tool for assessing activity friendliness. American Journal of Health Promotion, 21(6), 534-537.
13. Kaczynski, A.T., & Henderson, K.A. (2007). Environmental correlates of physical activity: A review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(4), 315-354.
14. Kaczynski, A.T., Koohsari, M.J., Wilhelm Stanis, S.A., Bergstrom, R., & Sugiyama, T. (2013). Association of street connectivity and traffic speed with park usage and park-based physical activity. American Journal of Health Promotion. >Advance online publication. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.120711-QUAN-339
15. Kaczynski, A.T., Potwarka, L.R., Smale, B.J. A., & Havitz, M.E. (2009). Association of parkland proximity with neighborhood and park-based physical activity: Variations by gender and age. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31(2), 174-191.
16. Kaczynski, A.T., Wilhelm Stanis, S.A., & Besenyi, G.M. (2012). Development and testing of a community stakeholder park audit tool. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(3), 242-249.
17. Klarqvist, B. (1993). A space syntax glossary. Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, 2, 11-12.
18. Koohsari, M.J., Karakiewicz, J.A., & Kaczynski, A.T. (2013). Public open space and walking: The role of proximity, perceptual qualities of the surrounding built environment, and street configuration. Environment and Behavior, 45(6), 706-736.
19. Kostakos, V. (2010). Space syntax and pervasive systems. In B.Yao Jiang & X.Yao (Eds.), Geospatial analysis and modelling of urban structure and dynamics (pp. 31-52). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
20. Lachowycz, K., Jones, A.P., Page, A.S., Wheeler, B.W., & Cooper, A.R. (2012). What can global positioning systems tell us about the contribution of different types of urban greenspace to children's physical activity? Health & Place, 18(3), 586-594.
21. Leck, E. (2006). The impact of urban form on travel behavior: A meta-analysis. Berkeley Planning Journal, 19, 37-58.
22. Leslie, E., Cerin, E., duToit, L., Owen, N., & Bauman, A. (2007). Objectively assessing 'walkability' of local communities: Using GIS to identify the relevant environmental attributes GIS for health and the environment. In P.C. Lai & A.S. H. Mak (Eds.), GIS for health and the environment: Development in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 91-104). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
23. Liu, X., & Jiang, B. (2012). Defining and generating axial lines from street center lines for better understanding of urban morphologies. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1-12.
24. McCormack, G.R., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2008). The relationship between destination proximity, destination mix and physical activity behaviors. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 33-40.
25. McCormack, G.R., Rock, M., Toohey, A.M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & Place, 16(4), 712-726.
26. Mecredy, G., Pickett, W., & Janssen, I. (2011). Street connectivity is negatively associated with physical activity in Canadian youth. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 8(8), 3333-3350.
27. Nicholls, S. (2001). Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: A case study using GIS. Managing Leisure, 6(4), 201-219.
28. Peponis, J., Ross, C., & Rashid, M. (1997). The structure of urban space, movement and co-presence: The case of Atlanta. Geoforum, 28(3-4), 341-358.
29. Peponis, J., & Wineman, J. (2002). Spatial structure of environment and behavior. In R.B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 271-291). New York, NY: Wiley.
30. Sadalla, EK.K., & Magel, S.G. (1980). The perception of traversed distance. Environment and Behavior, 12(1), 65-79.
31. Sadalla, E.K., & Staplin, L.J. (1980). The perception of traversed distance: Intersections. Environment and Behavior, 12(2), 167-182.
32. Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F., Black, J.B., & Chen, D. (2003). Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1552-1558.
33. Sallis, J.F. (2009). Measuring physical activity environments: A brief history. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(4, Supplement), S86-92.
34. Stangl, P., & Guinn, J.M. (2011). Neighborhood design, connectivity assessment and obstruction. Urban Design International, 16(4), 285-296.
35. Sugiyama, T., Francis, J., Middleton, N.J., Owen, N., & Giles-Corti, B. (2010). Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. American Journal of Public Health, 100(9), 1752-1757.
36. Sugiyama, T., Neuhaus, M., Cole, R., Giles-Corti, B., & Owen, N. (2012). Destination and route attributes associated with adults' walking: A review. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 44(7), 1275-1286.
37. Talen, E. (2003). Neighborhoods as service providers: A methodology for evaluating pedestrian access. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(2), 181-200.
38. Troped, P.J., Cromley, E.K., Fragala, M.S., Melly, S.J., Hasbrouck, H.H., Gortmaker, S.L., & Brownson, R.C. (2006). Development and reliability and validity testing of an audit tool for trail/path characteristics: The Path Environment Audit Tool (PEAT). Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3, S158-175.
39. Vaughan, L. (2007). The spatial syntax of urban segregation. Progress in Planning, 67(3), 205-294.
40. Weiss, R.L., Maantay, J.A., & Fahs, M. (2010). Promoting active urban aging: A measurement approach to neighborhood walkability for older adults. Cities and the Environment, 3(1), 1-17.