Information flow in animal-robot interactions

Entropy

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1315-1330

  Butail, Sachit ^a   Ladu, Fabrizio ^a   Spinello, Davide ^b   Porfiri, Maurizio ^a  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Entropy; Information flow; Robotics; Social behavior; Zebrafish

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897000421     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10994300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/e16031315     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Dall, S.R.; Giraldeau, L.A.; Olsson, O.; McNamara, J.M.; Stephens, D.W. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20, 187-193.
2. Ballerini, M.; Cabibbo, N.; Candelier, R.; Cavagna, A.; Cisbani, E.; Giardina, I.; Lecomte, V.; Orlandi, A.; Parisi, G.; Procaccini, A.; et al. Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 1232-1237.
3. Partridge, B.L.; Pitcher, T.J. The sensory basis of fish schools: Relative roles of lateral line and vision. J. Comp. Physiol. A: Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 1980, 135, 315-325.
4. Eaton, R.; Emberley, D. How stimulus direction determines the trajectory of the Mauthner-initiated escape response in a teleost fish. J. Exp. Biol. 1991, 161, 469.
5. Gallup, A.C.; Chong, A.; Couzin, I.D. The directional flow of visual information transfer between pedestrians. Biol. Lett. 2012, 8, 520-522.
6. Miller, N.; Garnier, S.; Hartnett, A.T.; Couzin, I.D. Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 5263-5268.
7. Couzin, I.D.; Krause, J.; Franks, N.R.; Levin, S.A. Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 2005, 433, 513-516.
8. Krause, J.; Winfield, A.F.T.; Deneubourg, J. Interactive robots in experimental biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26, 369-375.
9. Woo, K.L.; Rieucau, G. From dummies to animations: A review of computer-animated stimuli used in animal behavior studies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2011, 65, 1671-1685.
10. Mitri, S.; Wischmann, S.; Floreano, D.; Keller, L. Using robots to understand social behaviour. Biol. Rev. 2013, 88, 31-39.
11. Hlavácková-Schindler, K.; Paluš, M.; Vejmelka, M.; Bhattacharya, J. Causality detection based on information-theoretic approaches in time series analysis. Phys. Rep. 2007, 441, 1-46.
12. Vejmelka, M.; Paluš, M. Inferring the directionality of coupling with conditional mutual information. Phys. Rev. E 2008, 77, 026214.
13. Sun, J.; Bollt, E.M. Causation entropy identifies indirect influences, dominance of neighbors and anticipatory couplings. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 2014, 267, 49-57.
14. David, O.; Guillemain, I.; Saillet, S.; Reyt, S.; Deransart, C.; Segebarth, C.; Depaulis, A. Identifying neural drivers with functional MRI: An electrophysiological validation. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, 2683-2697.
15. Paluš, M.; Hartman, D.; Hlinka, J.; Vejmelka, M. Discerning connectivity from dynamics in climate networks. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 2011, 18, 751-763.
16. Cover, T.M.; Thomas, J.A. Elements of Information Theory; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1991.
17. Shannon, C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27, 379-423.
18. Li,W. Mutual information functions versus correlation functions. J. Stat. Phys. 1990, 60, 823-837.
19. Vicente, R.; Wibral, M.; Lindner, M.; Pipa, G. Transfer entropy-A model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences. J. Comput. Neurosci. 2011, 30, 45-67.
20. Nichols, J.; Seaver, M.; Trickey, S.; Todd, M.; Olson, C.; Overbey, L. Detecting nonlinearity in structural systems using the transfer entropy. Phys. Rev. E 2005, 72, 046217.
21. Kantz, H.; Schreiber, T. Nonlinear Time Series Analysis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004.
22. Kleeman, R. Information theory and dynamical system predictability. Entropy 2011, 13, 612-649.
23. Paulus, M.P.; Geyer, M.A.; Gold, L.H.; Mandell, A.J. Application of entropy measures derived from the ergodic theory of dynamical systems to rat locomotor behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 723-727.
24. Kadota, M.; White, E.J.; Torisawa, S.; Komeyama, K.; Takagi, T. Employing relative entropy techniques for assessing modifications in animal behavior. PLoS One 2011, 6, e28241.
25. Sudderth, E.A.; Sudderth, E.B. Quantifying aphid behavioral responses to environmental change. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2013, 150, 1-12.
26. Herbert-Read, J.E.; Perna, A.; Mann, R.P.; Schaerf, T.M.; Sumpter, D.J.T.; Ward, A.J.W. Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 18726-18731.
27. Choi, J.; Lee, J.; Oh, S. Biologically-inspired navigation strategies for swarm intelligence using spatial Gaussian processes. In Proceedings of the International Federation of Automatic Control, Seoul, Korea, 6-11 July 2008; pp. 593-598.
28. Kim, C.Y.; Song, D.; Xu, Y.; Yi, J. Localization of multiple unknown transient radio sources using multiple paired mobile robots with limited sensing ranges. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, China, 9-13 May 2011; pp. 5167-5172.
29. Lieschke, G.J.; Currie, P.D. Animal models of human disease: Zebrafish swim into view. Nat. Rev. Genetics 2007, 8, 353-367.
30. Miklósi, A.; Andrew, R.J. The zebrafish as a model for behavioral studies. Zebrafish 2006, 3, 227-234.
31. Kalueff, A.V.; Steward, A.M.; Gerlai, R. Zebrafish as an emerging model for studying complex brain disorders. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 35, 63-75.
32. Miller, N.; Gerlai, R. Quantification of shoaling behaviour in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav. Brain Res. 2007, 184, 157-166.
33. Saverino, C.; Gerlai, R. The social zebrafish: Behavioral responses to conspecific, heterospecific, and computer animated fish. Behav. Brain Res. 2008, 191, 77-87.
34. Rényi, A. On measures of entropy and information. In Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, CA, USA, 20 June-30 July 1960; pp. 547-561.
35. Grassberger, P.; Procaccia, I. Estimation of the Kolmogorov entropy from a chaotic signal. Phys. Rev. A 1983.
36. Schreiber, T. Measuring information transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 461-464.
37. Paluš, M.; Komárek, V.; Hrnčí, Z.; Štěrbová, K. Synchronization as adjustment of information rates: Detection from bivariate time series. Phys. Rev. E 2001, 63, 046211.
38. Granger, C. Testing for causality: A personal viewpoint. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 1980, 2, 329-352.
39. Paluš, M.; Vejmelka, M. Directionality of coupling from bivariate time series: How to avoid false causalities and missed connections. Phys. Rev. E 2007, 75, 056211.
40. Costa, M.; Goldberger, A.; Peng, C.K. Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 068102.
41. Smirnov, D.A. Spurious causalities with transfer entropy. Phys. Rev. E 2013, 87, 042917.
42. Grassberger, P.; Procaccia, I. Characterization of Strange Attractors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 50, 346-349.
43. Baptista, M.S.; Rubinger, R.M.; Viana, E.R.; Sartorelli, J.C.; Parlitz, U.; Grebogi, C. Mutual information rate and bounds for it. PLoS One 2012, 7, e46745.
44. Cahill, G. Clock mechanisms in zebrafish. Cell Tissue Res. 2002, 309, 27-34.
45. Blaser, R.; Gerlai, R. Behavioral phenotyping in zebrafish: Comparison of three behavioral quantification methods. Behav. Res. Methods 2006, 38, 456-469.
46. Kopman, V.; Laut, J.; Polverino, G.; Porfiri, M. Closed-loop control of zebrafish response using a bioinspired robotic-fish in a preference test. J. R. Soc. Interface 2013, 10, 20120540.
47. Cianca, V.; Bartolini, T.; Porfiri, M.; Macrí, S. A robotics-based behavioral paradigm to measure anxiety-related responses in zebrafish. PLoS One 2013, 8, e69661.
48. Spinello, C.; Macrí, S.; Porfiri, M. Acute ethanol administration affects zebrafish preference for a biologically-inspired robot. Alcohol 2013, 47, 391-398.
49. Polverino, G.; Abaid, N.; Kopman, V.; Macrí, S.; Porfiri, M. Zebrafish response to robotic fish: Preference experiments on isolated individuals and small shoals. Bioinspiration Biomim. 2012, 7, 036019.
50. Polverino, G.; Porfiri, M. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) behavioural response to bioinspired robotic fish and mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Bioinspiration Biomim. 2013, 8, 044001.
51. Abaid, N.; Bartolini, T.; Macrí, S.; Porfiri, M. Zebrafish responds differentially to a robotic fish of varying aspect ratio, tail beat frequency, noise, and color. Behav. Brain Res. 2012, 233, 545-553.
52. Phamduy, P.; Polverino, G.; Fuller, R.; Porfiri, M. Fish and robot dancing together: Bluefin killifish respond differently to the courtship of a robot with varying colour morphs. Unpublished work, 2014.
53. Martin, P.; Bateson, P.P.G. Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993.
54. McDonald, J.H. Handbook of Biological Statistics; Sparky House Publishing: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2009.
55. Wong, K.; Elegante, M.; Bartels, B.; Elkhayat, S.; Tien, D.; Roy, S.; Goodspeed, J.; Suciu, C.; Tan, J.; Grimes, C.; et al. Analyzing habituation responses to novelty in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav. Brain Res. 2010, 208, 450-457.
56. Butail, S.; Bartolini, T.; Porfiri, M. Collective response of zebrafish shoals to a free-swimming robotic fish. PLoS One 2013, 8, e76123.
57. Bracewell, R.N. The fourier transform. Sci. Am. 1989, 260, 86-95.
58. Paluš, M. Coarse-grained entropy rates for characterization of complex time series. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 1996, 93, 64-77.
59. Miller, N.; Gerlai, R. From schooling to shoaling: Patterns of collective motion in zebrafish (Danio rerio). PLoS One 2012, 7, e48865.
60. Blaser, R.E.; Chadwick, L.; McGinnis, G.C. Behavioral measures of anxiety in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav. Brain Res. 2010, 208, 56-62.
61. Halloy, J.; Sempo, G.; Caprari, G.; Rivault, C.; Asadpour, M.; Tâche, F.; Saïd, I.; Durier, V.; Canonge, S.; Amé, J.M.; et al. Social integration of robots into groups of cockroaches to control self-organized choices. Science 2007, 318, 1155-1158.
62. Partan, S.R.; Larco, C.P.; Owens, M.J. Wild tree squirrels respond with multisensory enhancement to conspecific robot alarm behaviour. Anim. Behav. 2009, 77, 1127-1135.
63. Marras, S.; Porfiri, M. Fish and robots swimming together: Attraction towards the robot demands biomimetic locomotion. J. R. Soc. Interface 2012, 9, 1856-1868.
64. Lachlan, R.F.; Crooks, L.; Laland, K.N. Who follows whom? Shoaling preferences and social learning of foraging information in guppies. Anim. Behav. 1998, 56, 181-190.