Closed-loop control of zebrafish response using a bioinspired robotic-fish in a preference test

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 10, Issue 78, 2013, Pages

  Kopman, Vladislav ^a   Laut, Jeffrey ^a   Polverino, Giovanni ^a   Porfiri, Maurizio ^a  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal behaviour; Bioinspiration; Closed loop control; Ethorobotics; Zebrafish

Indexed keywords

ROBOTICS; WATER TANKS;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR; BIO-INSPIRATION; CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL; ETHOROBOTICS; ZEBRAFISH;

FISH;

ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; BIOMIMETICS; FEMALE; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; ROBOTICS; TAIL; VISUAL STIMULATION; ZEBRA FISH; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; PHYSIOLOGY; SWIMMING;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; FEMALE; MALE; ROBOTICS; SWIMMING; TAIL; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 84871347007     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0540     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Fujita M. 2001 AIBO: toward the era of digital creatures. Int. J. Robot. Res. 20, 781-794. (doi:10.1177/02783640122068092)
2. Bar-Cohen Y. 2005 Biomimetics: biologically inspired technologies. Boca Raton, FL: CEC.
3. Krause J, Winfield AFT, Deneubourg J-L. 2011 Interactive robots in experimental biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 369-375. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011. 03.015)
4. Goldburg R, Naylor R. 2005 Future seascapes, fishing, and fish farming. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3, 21-28. (doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0021:FSFAFF]2.0. CO;2)
5. Pyke GH. 2008 Plague minnow or mosquito fish? A review of the biology and impacts of introduced Gambusia species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 171-191. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173451)
6. Schilt CR. 2007 Developing fish passage and protection at hydropower dams. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 104, 295-325. (doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.004)
7. Rashid MT, Frasca M, Ali AA, Ali RS, Fortuna L, Xibilia MG. 2012 Artemia swarm dynamics and path tracking. Nonlinear Dyn. 68, 555-563. (doi:10.1007/s11071-011-0237-6)
8. Michelsen A, Andersen BB, Storm J, Kirchner WH, Lindauer M. 1992 How honeybees perceive communication dances, studied by means of a mechanical model. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30, 143-150. (doi:10.1007/BF00166696)
9. Abaid N, Bartolini T, Macrì S, Porfiri M. 2012 What zebrafish want: aspect ratio, motility, and color modulate robot-fish interactions. Behav. Brain Res. 233, 545-553. (doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2012.05.047)
10. Aureli M, Fiorilli F, Porfiri M. 2012 Portraits of self-organization in fish schools interacting with robots. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 241, 908-920. (doi:10.1016/j.physd.2012.02.005)
11. Faria JJ, Dyer J, Clément R, Couzin I, Holt N, Ward A, Waters D, Krause J. 2010 A novel method for investigating the collective behaviour of fish: introducing 'Robofish'. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64, 1211-1218. (doi10.1007/s00265-010-0988-y)
12. Marras S, Porfiri M. 2012 Fish and robots swimming together: attraction towards the robot demands biomimetic locomotion. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 1856-1868. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0084)
13. Polverino G, Abaid N, Kopman V, Macrì S, Porfiri M. 2012 Zebrafish response to robotic fish: preference experiments on isolated individuals and small shoals. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 7, 036019. (doi:10.1088/1748-3182/7/3/ 036019)
14. Rossi C, Coral W, Barrientos A. 2012 Swimming physiology of fish: towards using exercise for farming a fit fish in sustainable aquaculture, chapter Robotic fish to lead the school. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
15. de Margerie E, Lumineau S, Houdelier C, Richard Yris M-A. 2011 Influence of a mobile robot on the spatial behaviour of quail chicks. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 6, 034001. (doi:10.1088/1748-3182/6/3/034001)
16. Göth A, Evans CS. 2004 Social responses without early experience: Australian brush-turkey chicks use. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 2199-2208. (doi:10.1242/jeb.01008)
17. Fernández-Juricic E, Gilak N, McDonald JC, Pithia P, Valcarcel A. 2006 A dynamic method to study the transmission of social foraging information in flocks using robots. Anim. Behav. 71, 901-911. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005. 09.008)
18. Fernández-Juricic E, Kowalski V. 2011 Where does a flock end from an information perspective? A comparative experiment with live and robotic birds. Behav. Ecol. 22, 1304-1311. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arr132)
19. Partan SR, Larco CP, Owens MJ. 2009 Wild tree squirrels respond with multisensory enhancement to conspecific robot alarm behaviour. Anim. Behav. 77, 1127-1135. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.029)
20. Halloy J et al. 2007 Social integration of robots into groups of cockroaches to control self-organized choices. Science 318, 1155-1158. (doi:10.1126/science.1144259)
21. Swain DT, Couzin ID, Leonard NE. 2012 Real-time feedback-controlled robotic fish for behavioral experiments with fish schools. Proc. IEEE 100, 150-163. (doi:10.1109/JPROC.2011.2165449)
22. Bohlen M. 1999 A robot in a cage-exploring interactions between animals and robots. In Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, Monterey, CA, November 1999, pp. 214-219. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
23. Vaughan R, Sumpter N, Henderson J, Frost A, Cameron S. 2000 Experiments in automatic flock control. Robot. Auton. Syst. 31, 109-117. (doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00084-6)
24. Patricelli GL, Uy AC, Walsh G, Borgia G. 2002 Sexual selection: male displays adjusted to female's response. Nature 415, 279-280. (doi:10.1038/415279a)
25. Kubinyi E, Miklosi A, Kaplan F, Gacsi M, Topal J, Csanyi V. 2004 Social behaviour of dogs encountering AIBO, an animal-like robot in a neutral and in a feeding situation. Behav. Proc. 65, 231-239. (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2003.10.003)
26. Takanishi A, Aoki T, Ito M, Ohkawa Y, Yamaguchi J. 1998 Interaction between creature and robot: development of an experiment system for rat and rat robot interaction. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Victoria, BC, October 1998, vol. 3, pp. 1975-1980. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
27. Gerlai R. 2010 High-throughput behavioral screens: the first step towards finding genes involved in vertebrate brain function using zebrafish. Molecules 15, 2609-2622. (doi:10.3390/molecules15042609)
28. Miklósi A, Andrew R. 2006 The zebrafish as a model for behavioral studies. Zebrafish 3, 227-234. (doi:10.1089/zeb.2006.3.227)
29. Cahill G. 2002 Clock mechanisms in zebrafish. Cell Tissue Res. 309, 27-34. (doi:10.1007/s00441-002-0570-7)
30. Quera V, Beltran FS, Dolado R. 2011 Determining shoal membership: a comparison between momentary and trajectory-based methods. Behav. Brain Res. 225 363-366. (doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.07.017)
31. Rosenthal GG, Ryan MJ. 2005 Assortative preferences for stripes in danios. Anim. Behav. 70, 1063-1066. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.005)
32. Saverino C, Gerlai R. 2008 The social zebrafish: behavioral responses to conspecific, heterospecific, and computer animated fish. Behav. Brain Res. 191, 77-87. (doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.013)
33. Snekser JL, Ruhl N, Bauer K, McRobert SP. 2010 The influence of sex and phenotype on shoaling decisions in zebrafish. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 23, 70-81.
34. Plaut I. 2000 Effects of fin size on swimming performance, swimming behaviour and routine activity of zebrafish Danio rerio. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 813-820.
35. Kohler D. 1976 The interaction between conditioned fish and naive schools of juvenile carp (Cyprinus carpio, pisces). Behav. Processes 1, 267-275. (doi:10.1016/0376-6357(76)90027-9)
36. Buske C, Gerlai R. 2011 Shoaling develops with age in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Prog. Neuro Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 35, 1409-1415. (doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.09.003)
37. Kopman V, Porfiri M. In press. Design, modeling, and characterization of a miniature robotic-fish for research and education in biomimetics and bioinspiration. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics. (doi:10.1109/TMECH.2012.2222431)
38. Abaid N, Kopman V, Porfiri M. 2012 The story of a Brooklyn outreach program on biomimetics, underwater robotics, and marine science for K-12 students. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. (doi:10.1109/MRA.2012.2184672)
39. Balch T, Khan Z, Veloso M. 2001 Automatically tracking and analyzing the behavior of live insect colonies. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents, pp. 521-528, Montreal, Canada.
40. Butail S, Paley DA. 2012 Three-dimensional reconstruction of the fast-start swimming kinematics of densely schooling fish. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 77-88. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2011.0113)
41. Ogata K. 2010 Modern control engineering, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42. Wong K et al. 2010 Analyzing habituation responses to novelty in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav. Brain Res. 208, 450-457. (doi:10.1016/j.bbr. 2009.12.023)
43. Gerlai R, Fernandes Y, Pereira T. 2009 Zebrafish (Danio rerio) responds to the animated image of a predator: towards the development of an automated aversive task. Behav. Brain Res. 201, 318-324. (doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.003)
44. Maximino C, de Brito T, da Silva Batista A, Herculano A, Morato S, Gouveia Jr A. 2010 Measuring anxiety in zebrafish: a critical review. Behav. Brain Res. 214, 157-171. (doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.031)
45. Dempster T, Taquet M. 2004 Fish aggregation device (FAD) research: gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 14, 21-42. (doi:10.1007/s11160-004-3151-x)
46. Higgs DM, Rollo AK, Souza MJ, Popper AN. 2003 Development of form and function in peripheral auditory structures of the zebrafish (Danio rerio). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 1145-1154. (doi:10.1121/1.1536185)
47. Reebs SG. 2000 Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal? Anim. Behav. 59, 403-409. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1999. 1314)
48. Zion B, Barki A, Grinshpon J, Rosenfeld L, Karplus I. 2007 Social facilitation of acoustic training in the common carp Cyprinus carpio (L.). Behaviour 144, 611-630. (doi:10.1163/156853907781347781)
49. Pather S, Gerlai R. 2009 Shuttle box learning in zebrafish. Behav. Brain Res. 196, 323-327. (doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.09.013)