Mathematical modelling of adult hippocampal neurogenesis: Effects of altered stem cell dynamics on cell counts and bromodeoxyuridine-labelled cells

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 11, Issue 94, 2014, Pages

  Ziebell, Frederik ^a,b   Martin Villalba, Ana ^b   Marciniak Czochra, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Mathematical modelling; Neurogenesis; Ordinary differential equations; Stem cells

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; CELL PROLIFERATION; EXPERIMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; STEM CELLS;

ASYMMETRIC-CELLS; CELL PROLIFERATION RATE; DYNAMIC BEHAVIOURS; HIPPOCAMPAL NEUROGENESIS; NEUROGENESIS; NON-TRIVIAL TASKS; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SYSTEM OF ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

CYTOLOGY;

BROXURIDINE; CELL MARKER; ANTIMETABOLITE;

ARTICLE; ASTROCYTE; ASYMMETRIC CELL DIVISION; CELL COUNT; CELL DIVISION; CELL LABELING; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL RENEWAL; HIPPOCAMPUS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NEURAL STEM CELL; NEUROBLAST; STEM CELL; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CYTOLOGY; HUMAN; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MATHEMATICAL MODELLING; METABOLISM; MOUSE; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STAINING;

MATHEMATICAL MODELLING; NEUROGENESIS; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; STEM CELLS;

ANIMALS; ANTIMETABOLITES; BROMODEOXYURIDINE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL STEM CELLS; NEUROGENESIS; STAINING AND LABELING;

EID: 84896955584     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0144     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ming G-L, Song H. 2011 Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain: significant answers and significant questions. Neuron 70, 687-702. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.001)
2. Bonaguidi MA, Wheeler MA, Shapiro JS, Stadel RP, Sun GJ, Li Ming G, Song H. 2011 In vivo clonal analysis reveals self-renewing and multipotent adult neural stem cell characteristics. Cell 145, 1142-1155. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011. 05.024)
3. Encinas JM, Michurina TV, Peunova N, Park J-H, Tordo J, Peterson DA, Fishell G, Koulakov A, Enikolopov G. 2011 Division-coupled astrocytic differentiation and age-related depletion of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell 8, 566-579. (doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.03.010)
4. Ben Abdallah NM, Slomianka L, Vyssotski AL, Lipp HP. 2010 Early age-related changes in adult hippocampal neurogenesis in C57 mice. Neurobiol. Aging 31, 151-161. (doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging. 2008.03.002)
5. Lee SW, Clemenson GD, Gage FH. 2012 New neurons in an aged brain. Behav. Brain Res. 227, 497-507. (doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.10.009)
6. Ables JL, Decarolis NA, Johnson MA, Rivera PD, Gao Z, Cooper DC, Radtke F, Hsieh J, Eisch AJ. 2010 Notch1 is required for maintenance of the reservoir of adult hippocampal stem cells. J. Neurosci. 30, 10 484-10 492. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4721-09)
7. Corsini NS et al. 2009 The death receptor CD95 activates adult neural stem cells for working memory formation and brain repair. Cell Stem Cell 5, 178-190. (doi:10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.004)
8. Furutachi S, Matsumoto A, Nakayama KI, Gotoh Y. 2013 p57 controls adult neural stem cell quiescence and modulates the pace of lifelong neurogenesis. EMBO J. 32, 970-981. (doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.50)
9. Jang MH et al. 2013 Secreted frizzled-related protein 3 regulates activity-dependent adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 12, 215-223. (doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.11.021)
10. Seib DR, Corsini NS, Ellwanger K, Plaas C, Mateos A, Pitzer C, Niehrs C, Celikel T, Martin-Villalba A. 2013 Loss of Dickkopf-1 restores neurogenesis in old age and counteracts cognitive decline. Cell Stem Cell 12, 204-214. (doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.11.010)
11. Ashbourn JM, Miller JJ, Reumers V, Baekelandt V, Geris L. 2012 A mathematical model of adult subventricular neurogenesis. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 2414-2423. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0193)
12. Aimone JB, Wiles J, Gage FH. 2009 Computational influence of adult neurogenesis on memory encoding. Neuron 61, 187-202. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008. 11.026)
13. Marciniak-Czochra A, Stiehl T, Ho AD, Jager W, Wagner W. 2009 Modeling of asymmetric cell division in hematopoietic stem cells-regulation of self-renewal is essential for efficient repopulation. Stem Cells Dev. 18, 377-385. (doi:10.1089/scd.2008.0143)
14. Stiehl T, Marciniak-Czochra A. 2011 Characterization of stem cells using mathematical models of multistage cell lineages. Math. Comp. Model. 53, 1505-1517. (doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2010.03.057)
15. Whichard ZL, Sarkar CA, Kimmel M, Corey SJ. 2010 Hematopoiesis and its disorders: a systems biology approach. Blood 115, 2339-2347. (doi:10.1182/blood-2009-08-215798)
16. Jinno S. 2011 Decline in adult neurogenesis during aging follows a topographic pattern in the mouse hippocampus. J. Comp. Neurol. 519, 451-466. (doi:10.1002/cne.22527)
17. Kimmel M, Axelrod DE. 2002 Branching processes in biology, 6th edn. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
18. Huggins RM, Staudte RG. 1994 Cell lineage analysis: variance components models for dependent cell populations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89, 19-29. (doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476442)